January 29, 2020

Fox Sports Refuses Abortion Survivors Ad for Super Bowl Sunday

Fox Sports has refused to give Faces of Choice an answer regarding whether it will accept a 30-second ad featuring abortion survivors for Super Bowl Sunday. Ultimately, Fox rejected the ad by simply waiting for slots to fill and telling the organization nothing was left for them.



“We were one of the very first people to submit anything to them. We met every single stipulation that they asked for and every time we met the line they moved the line further to request something else,” Lyric Gillett, founder of Faces of Choice, told LifeSite News.

The ad was produced specifically so that it would be appropriate for a Super Bowl audience and doesn't use the word "abortion" once. Despite this, Faces of Choice was forced to jump through hoops to appease Fox's legal team, but it all came to nothing. Slots sold out and Fox never gave a yes or no answer to their submission. More slots became available last week, but Fox did not respond immediately to Faces of Choice's new application.

An extended version of the ad was shown at March for Life in Washington DC last week.

Click here to read more.

January 28, 2020

Former Planned Parenthood Worker from Champaign, IL Talks about Why She Worked There and How She Changed

In a podcast by weDignify, counselor and former Planned Parenthood employee Linda Couri details why she chose to work for the abortion corporation and how coming to terms with her own abortion drove her to become pro-life 11 years later. Now Couri works with weDignify (a pro-life organization in Illinois) to promote a life-affirming culture on college campuses.



Click here if the player above isn't working.

Buttigieg Asked if there is Room in the Democrat Party for Pro-Life Voices

Democrat Presidential Candidate Pete Buttigieg
Credit: Flickr / Gage Skidmore
Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life of America, asked a question to Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg on Monday on whether he believed there was space in the Democratic party for pro-life voices.

“I am a proud pro-life Democrat. So, do you want the support of pro-life Democrats—pro-life Democratic voters?” Day asked. “And if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party, to ensure that the party of diversity, of inclusion, really does include everybody?”

After avoiding the question to reiterate his pro-abortion stance, he told Day that he "understands" if Democrats choose not to vote for him because of his beliefs that the government should not regulate abortion in any way. This once again reveals the issue that pro-life Democrats have nowhere to turn in the upcoming election.

Senator Warren was asked on the presidential debate stage on November 20th if there was any room in the Democratic party for a pro-life politician, to which she responded the party was "fundamentally" about preserving access to abortion and “abortion rights are human rights.” She attempted to clarify that she didn't want to drive anyone away from the Democrat party, but she may be driving some away from the ballot box in 2020.

Pro-life activists have expressed frustration at the increasingly partisan nature of the abortion debate. Some even voiced to the Catholic News Agency that President Donald Trump's attendance at March for Life last week could alienate non-republicans, despite several pro-life Democrats also speaking at the event. “As a pro-life person, I think the movement needs all the help it can get to cross party lines,” Connie Poulos told CNA.

Click here to read more.

January 27, 2020

National Right to Life Annual Report: "The State of Abortion in the United States"

The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) released its seventh annual report, titled “The State of Abortion in the United States, 2020,” last Wednesday. The report tackles a variety of subjects surrounding the fight to end abortion: federal and state legislation, statistics analyzing the rate of abortions, what the Equal Rights Amendment represents, and Planned Parenthood's  2018-2019 annual report.

Key highlights from the report include:

  • Based on data from the Guttmacher Institute and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)– and estimating figures for subsequent years (2018-2019)–National Right to Life now estimates 61,628,584 abortions have been performed in the United States since 1973.
  • Utilizing data from the Guttmacher Institute and the CDC, National Right to Life estimates that the number of abortions has dropped to 862,320 annually – the lowest number recorded since 1973, and nearly 800,000 fewer than the all-time high of 1.6 million abortions in 1990. National Right to Life attributes continued pro-life educational, legislative, and political efforts with much of the overall decline seen over the past 30 years.
  • State legislatures continue to be successful in enacting pro-life legislation that extends protections to unborn children and helps their mothers. These laws include protections for pain-capable unborn children, laws banning dismemberment abortions of living unborn babies, and efforts to steer state funding away from organizations that perform abortions, such as Planned Parenthood.
  • Planned Parenthood, which reported over $1.6 billion in revenues in 2018-2019, while posting over $240 million in “excess revenue,” is estimated to have made nearly $160 million performing 345,672 abortions – over 40% of all abortions in the United States annually.

HHS Issues Warning to California: Stop Forcing Insurers to Cover Abortion or Lose Funding

Alex M. Azar II
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services
The Office of Civil Rights (OCR) at the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a press release on Friday, Jan 24 stating that California could lose HHS funding if it continues to require insurers in the state to cover elective abortions.

"OCR is issuing a Notice of Violation to the state of California, formally notifying California that it cannot impose universal abortion coverage mandates on health insurance plans and issuers in violation of federal conscience laws," the press release reads. "California has deprived over 28,000 people of plans that did not cover elective abortion, but now must cover abortion due to California’s mandate."

The OCR found that California's requirement violated the conscience protections of the Weldon Amendment. Under the amendment, federal funds can be withheld from governmental institutions that discriminate against those who do not wish to support abortion.

"If, after 30 days, OCR does not receive sufficient assurance that California will come into compliance with federal law, OCR will forward the Notice of Violation and the evidence supporting OCR’s findings in this matter to the HHS funding components from which California receives funding for appropriate action under applicable grants and contracts regulations. This action may ultimately result in limitations on continued receipt of certain HHS funds."

The press release further stated that the OCR was reprimanded in January of 2019 for requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to refer patients to abortions under the threat of fines.

“No one in America should be forced to pay for or cover other people’s abortions,” said Roger Severino, Director of OCR. “We are putting California on notice that it must stop forcing people of good will to subsidize the taking of human life, not only because it’s the moral thing to do, but because it’s the law,” Severino concluded.

Click here to read more.

January 24, 2020

President Trump Becomes First President to Speak at March for Life

On Friday, President Trump became the first president to attend March for Life in Washington D.C. The event has been held every year near the anniversary of Roe v. Wade to rally pro-life advocates in their fight to protect unborn life.

"When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation," Trump said. "When we hold a newborn in our arms, we know the endless love that each child brings to a family. When we watch a child grow, we see the splendor that radiates from each human soul. One life changes the world – from my family, and I can tell you, I send love, and I send great, great love – and from the first day in office, I have taken historic action to support America’s families and to protect the unborn."

The President used his speaking time to thank and encourage pro-life advocates, tout the steps his administration has taken to protect unborn life, and point out the steps abortion advocates have taken to expand abortion.


"We cannot know what our citizens yet unborn will achieve. The dreams they will imagine. The masterpieces they will create. The discoveries they will make. But we know this: every life brings love into this world. Every child brings joy to a family. Every person is worth protecting."

"And above all, we know that every human soul is divine and every human life, born and unborn, is made in the holy image of Almighty God."

Click here to read more.

Ohio State Senator to Introduce Bill Protecting Women from Telemed Abortions

The practice of selling abortion medication online to women to use in their homes without medical supervision has resulted in the deaths of at least 24 women in the US (though likely more since most states don't report abortion-related statistics). An Ohio State Senator plans to introduce legislation designed to stop that practice from killing women in his state.

Ohio State Senator Steve Huffman says his bill will require women who want to use the abortion pill to visit an abortion facility.

“It’s about safety,” Huffman said to NBC 4. “… It’s so important that someone should be there looking somebody in the eye and making that decision, not somebody out in California or New York that has a website that you can get on and get the medication to have an abortion.”

Huffman plans to introduce the bill next week and believes it can garner enough support to make it to Ohio's House of Representatives.

Click here to read more.

Massachusetts Woman Hospitalized After Hemorrhaging a Half-Gallon of Blood During Abortion

An employee at Four Women Health Services in Attleboro, Massachusetts called 911 after the clinic committed an abortion which caused a patient to hemorrhage over a half-gallon of blood.

“This is an emergency. I need you to come and bring the patient to the hospital,” the employee said. She was slow to respond to the 911 operator's question and only revealed that the patient was hemorrhaging after she was asked a second time.

The patient was on multiple prescription medications when she had her abortion. According to Operation Rescue President Troy Newman, the local abortion center had no business trying to complete an abortion procedure on a patient with that medical history.

“This woman obviously had some medical issues that added risks to her abortion. She should have been cared for by legitimate health care professionals, and not the abortion hacks down at the local mill,” Newman said. “The reality is that women suffer life-threatening abortion complications nearly every day, and sometimes women die. Abortion isn’t safe, and that is a dirty secret that the Abortion Cartel can no longer keep.”

Click here to read more.

January 23, 2020

Donald Trump to be First President to Attend March for Life in Person

March for Life 2015
Credit: American Life League / Flickr
President Trump announced that he would be the first president in U.S. history to attend the March for Life rally this Friday.

The March for Life Rally in Washington D.C. has been an annual event since the first anniversary of Roe v. Wade (decided in 1973), but no president has ever attended the event.

March for Life president Jeanne Mancini gave this statement:

"We are deeply honored to welcome President Trump to the 47th annual March for life. He will be the first president in history to attend and we are so excited for him to experience in person how passionate our marchers are about life and protecting the unborn. From the appointment of pro-life judges and federal workers, to cutting taxpayer funding for abortions here and abroad, to calling for an end to late-term abortions, President Trump and his Administration have been consistent champions for life and their support for the March for Life has been unwavering. We are grateful for all these pro-life accomplishments and look forward to gaining more victories for life in the future."

Video: The True History of Roe v. Wade

Live Action News created a video showing the little-known history of Roe v. Wade and its companion case Doe v. Bolton. In both cases, the plaintiffs were taken advantage of by activist lawyers. Neither ever attended hearings and both became pro-life.



To learn more about the history of this questionable decision, click here. To learn more about the plaintiffs "Jane Roe" and "Mary Doe," who are now pro-life activists, click here.

President Donald Trump Declared Jan 22, 2020 "National Sanctity of Human Life Day"

Yesterday on the 47th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, President Donald Trump declared the first National Sanctity of Human Life Day.

"Every person — the born and unborn, the poor, the downcast, the disabled, the infirm, and the elderly — has inherent value. Although each journey is different, no life is without worth or is inconsequential; the rights of all people must be defended. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, our Nation proudly and strongly reaffirms our commitment to protect the precious gift of life at every stage, from conception to natural death," he wrote.

"As a Nation, we must remain steadfastly dedicated to the profound truth that all life is a gift from God, who endows every person with immeasurable worth and potential. Countless Americans are tireless defenders of life and champions for the vulnerable among us. We are grateful for those who support women experiencing unexpected pregnancies, those who provide healing to women who have had abortions, and those who welcome children into their homes through foster care and adoption. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonderful gift of life and renew our resolve to build a culture where life is always revered."

January 22, 2020

Pro-life Representatives Mark 47th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade

Credit: Flickr / Phil Roeder
Pro-life legislators in the House of Representatives commemorated the anniversary of Roe v. Wade with speeches pushing for adoption of life-affirming legislation such as the Dignity for Aborted Children Act and the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.

The Dignity for Aborted Children Act would require aborted children to be buried or cremated. This would protect remains from being discarded in places such as the late abortionist Ulrich Klopfer's basement, where he hid over 2,000 bodies of aborted children.

The Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would require medical facilities to provide children who are born alive in spite of abortion procedures to give the same medical treatment any other child would receive after birth.

Live Action News compiled links to speeches from many pro-life representatives. To watch them and read more, click here.

Study Suggests Babies can Feel Pain Before 24 Weeks Gestation

A new study co-authored by John C Bockmann and Stuart Derbyshire, the latter of whom is pro-choice, suggests that, contrary to pro-abortion rhetoric, unborn children can feel the pain caused by abortion before their 24th week of gestation.

The study, titled "Reconsidering Fetal Pain," explains that other studies that came to the conclusion that unborn children cannot feel pain before 24 weeks gestation operated under the assumption that certain parts of the child's neuro system hadn't developed enough. This study suggests those parts may be unnecessary. “More recent evidence calling into question the necessity of the cortex for pain and demonstrating functional thalamic connectivity into the subplate is used to argue that the neuroscience cannot definitively rule out fetal pain before 24 weeks,” it reads.

The researchers explained further,

"...current neuroscientific evidence undermines the necessity of the cortex for pain experience. Even if the cortex is deemed necessary for pain experience, there is now good evidence that thalamic projections into the subplate, which emerge around 12 weeks’ gestation, are functional and equivalent to thalamocortical projections that emerge around 24 weeks’ gestation. Thus, current neuroscientific evidence supports the possibility of fetal pain before the 'consensus' cutoff of 24 weeks."

Derbyshire remains pro-choice in spite of his own study's conclusion. He says that abortionists should, “consider some form of fetal analgesia during later abortions.” Even if Derbyshire rejects the truth that these unborn children represent human lives that deserve protection, perhaps his research can help further the cause of pro-life advocates in the political sphere.

Click here to read more.

January 21, 2020

Wisconsin to Consider Amendment Giving Personhood to Preborn Children

Wisconsin Capitol
Credit: Jake Pfaffenroth / Flickr
Wisconsin legislators are considering legislation that would allow voters to decide on a "personhood amendment" which would make preborn children a protected class under state law.

Matt Sande, a representative of Pro-Life Wisconsin, told OneNewsNow why the amendment is necessary.

"In the Declaration of Rights of our state Constitution, the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness only applies to the born human being," Sande explains. "There is nothing nefarious in this; our founders were not contemplating legal child-killing 150 years ago. But from a pro-life perspective, it is an error."

Passage of this amendment would allow Wisconsin lawmakers to exercise more control over the abortion industry with legislation.

Click here to read more.

Representative Says Democrats Should Educate White House on Value of Foreign Aid for Family Planning

Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif.)
Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif.) told Devex.com that Democrats should, “educate the President and folks in the administration about the value” of US aid for overseas family planning programs.

“Let’s go in an area that we talk a lot about: the youth bulge. That is [a] national security issue in sub-Saharan Africa. You can play off of that,” Rep. Bera said. “If you want to address the youth bulge, part of that is empowering women and girls. Part of that, at a minimum, is providing voluntary family planning and so forth.”

U.S. aid for family planning overseas has subsidized abortion and forced sterilization for women overseas in the past. Programs that receive aid for family planning tend to focus on population control, shown by Representative Bera's use of the term "youth bulge" when discussing this issue with Devex. The organizations who are mostly concerned with population control will make it their goal to get women to have fewer children regardless of their wishes.

Click here to read more.

January 20, 2020

Pro-Life Activists Arrested at New Jersey Abortion Clinic

Credit: Michael Coghlan / Flickr
Five pro-life activists were arrested Saturday at the “Options for Women” abortion center in Plainfield, New Jersey.

The activists were acting as a part of the Red Rose Rescue campaign. While advocating for the lives of unborn children at the New Jersey clinic, they gave out roses with notes attached. The notes read, “You were made to love and to be loved...your goodness is greater than the difficulties of your situation. Circumstances in life change. A new life, however tiny, brings the promise of unrepeatable joy.” The contact information for crisis pregnancy centers was also printed on the notes. This is not the first time pro-life activists have been arrested at abortion centers, and it is unlikely to be the last.

“The Red Rose Rescue is an act of charity for women who feel for whatever reason they must have their innocent unborn children killed,” said spokeswoman Lisa Hart. “Those who took part were willing to embrace risks for these women and their babies. We will go into the very places where the unborn are put to death and extend help to the moms.”

She further explained that activists participating in the Red Rose Rescue campaign will stay at abortion centers even if their message is rejected to stay in solidarity with the children being killed there.

Click here to read more.

January 17, 2020

Planned Parenthood Plans to Spend $45 Million to Elect Pro-Abortion Candidates in 2020

Planned Parenthood, an organization that admits receiving 37% of its overall revenue from taxpayer funding in its 2017-2018 annual report, revealed to CBS reporter Kate Smith that it plans to spend record amounts in 2020 to support pro-abortion candidates.

Smith reported this move is “the biggest electoral effort in its history: a $45 million spend to support presidential, congressional and state-level candidates in the 2020 elections who support abortion rights.”

The abortion corporation wants to stop the recent influx of abortion regulations from states around the country and maintain the role of other states (like Illinois) as abortion havens for women who cannot access abortion in their own states. Smith explained Planned Parenthood's reasoning further:
"There is so much at stake if you are an abortion rights activist. I mean, last year, you saw an unprecedented number of abortion restrictions and bans across the country. This is not just the south and Midwest we’re talking about. I think there was 38 different states introduced at least some of these restrictions. They are really leaving no stone unturned. Every single state they are looking at, and how can they either find candidates that are less hostile toward abortion rights, or in some cases, finding candidates that are particularly open to reproductive health. For example, I spoke to a volunteer activist in Colorado. She was telling me that Colorado, their Planned Parenthood affiliates see patients from 38 different states."
Click here to read more.

Genetic Researchers Paid Women to be Artificially Inseminated so they Could Study Embryos.

A recent study led by CooperGenomics reproductive geneticist Santiago Munne took advantage of impoverished women by paying them to be artificially inseminated. Living embryos were flushed from their bodies and studied for the purpose of developing a new method of fertilization that is cheaper than in vitro fertilization, while also allowing doctors to destroy embryos with certain genetic conditions.

“What this essentially does is use a woman’s body as a petri dish,” Laurie Zoloth, a bioethicist at the University of Chicago, told NPR. “And there’s something about that that seems so profoundly disturbing.”

This study further stigmatizes genetic conditions, takes advantage of impoverished women by allowing them to sell their bodies for much-needed income, and even paid for the abortion of any children whose embryos weren't flushed from their mother's body.

Click here to read more.

January 16, 2020

IL Rep. Dan Lipinski Under Fire from Democrats over Support for Louisiana Abortion Regulation

U.S. Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-IL)
Credit: American Life League / Flickr
U.S. Rep. Dan Lipinksi (D-IL) is facing backlash from his party for his support of a Louisiana law that would require abortionists to maintain admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their facility.

Rep. Lipinski signed a friend of the court brief alongside 200 other Congress members to support Louisiana's law as it faces a Supreme Court Decision. For this, he is being heavily criticized by other members of his party, some of which argue he shouldn't be considered a Democrat at all.
Lipinski has also fallen under scrutiny from pro-life advocates in the past for his aye vote on the pro-abortion Equality Act. The Representative from Cook County voted in favor of the Equality Act, arguing that other aspects of the bill were positive enough that he could support it while trying to strengthen conscience protections afterward.

Rep. Lipinski offered this response to Live Action News when asked to comment:
The Louisiana law in question requires hospital admitting privileges for physicians performing abortions. I signed the amicus brief because I agree with the intention of the law as stated by the author, Democratic Louisiana State Representative Katrina Jackson: “If you are going to perform abortions in the State of Louisiana, you’re going to do so in a safe environment and in a safe manner that offers women the optimal protection and care of their bodies.” This is not an “undue burden.”
Click here to read more. 

Virginia General Assembly Votes to Ratify Expired Equal Rights Amendment

Virginia's Senate and House of Delegates voted Wednesday to ratify the ERA (Equal Rights Amendment). The ERA (which legally died in 1979) now has the support of 38 states according to activists, the number required to ratify the amendment into law.

The ERA simply states "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." Advocates believe that if this language were to be inserted to the Constitution of the United States, any legislation that would limit access to abortion would become unconstitutional. They argue that abortion regulation is discriminatory because it forces women to give birth when they don't want children. Since giving birth does not affect men in the same way, they see any regulation as discriminatory.

“This is an attempt to air-drop into the Constitution a sweeping provision that could be used to attack any federal, state, or local law or policy that in any way limits abortion — abortion in the final months, partial-birth abortion, abortions on minors, government funding of abortion, conscience-protection laws, you name it,” said National Right to Life Senior Policy Advisor Douglas D. Johnson.

The Department of Justice issued an opinion restating the fact that the Equal Rights Amendment died over 40 years ago, and cannot be added to the constitution. David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States, said, “NARA defers to DOJ on this issue and will abide by the OLC opinion, unless otherwise directed by a final court order.”

The House of Representatives is expected to vote on H.J. Res. 79 in the future, a resolution that would retroactively change the ratification deadline. Advocates claim that the resolution can pass with simple majorities in the house and senate. Constitutional amendments must pass the house and the senate with two-thirds votes in both houses before being passed onto the states for consideration.

NRL’s Johnson said, “This resolution is a legislative mutant – nothing like it is described in the Constitution. Its authors claim it can reach backwards in time and change the terms of a constitutional amendment resolution that a different Congress passed with two-thirds votes nearly 48 years ago – and even more remarkably, this mutant resolution can accomplish this time-warping feat on the strength of simple-majority votes.”

Click here to read more.