May 5, 2020

56 Pro-Life Leaders, Including National Right to Life President, Push FDA to Enforce Ban on Abortion Drugs Sold Over Internet

Photo Credit: mattza / Flickr
In a letter sent to the Food and Drug Administration, 56 pro-life leaders urged officials to enforce already-existing policies banning the sale and distribution of abortion drugs online.

Websites that sell abortion pills and ship them directly to a patient without them needing to meet with a doctor to have an ultrasound violate the FDA's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). The federal government applies these protections to abortion pills because women with undiagnosed ectopic pregnancies or without good direction from a doctor are at risk for potentially deadly complications if they attempt DIY abortions using the abortion pill regimen.

“Internet sales of mifepristone have the potential to multiply the inherent dangers of the drug combination, further endangering women’s lives which are already at risk in the abortion procedure,” said National Right to Life President Carol Tobias.

Click here to read the National Right to Life Statement.

Click here to read more from Live Action News.

Indiana Asks Supreme Court to Hear Medicaid Abortion Funding Case

Indiana State Capitol
Photo Credit: Drew Tarvin / Flickr
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill filed a request with the Supreme Court to review a case regarding states' right to determine whether abortion businesses can receive Medicaid funding.

“States have authority to determine who is a qualified Medicaid provider,” State Solicitor General Tom Fisher told CNA on May 1. Because Indiana officials did not want to subsidize abortions "even indirectly," they excluded abortion providers from their list of qualified Medicaid providers.

The Solicitor General told CNA that he was hopeful the Supreme Court would take this case.

“We pointed out to them this time that the lower courts are in conflict over whether Planned Parenthood or other Medicaid providers who get disqualified can sue a government,” Fisher said.

In 2018, the Supreme Court denied requests from Kansas and Louisiana to hear similar cases. Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas filed a dissent arguing that the court should have taken the case. The three justices noted that lower courts had ruled on both sides of the issue, and the Supreme Court needed to clarify the situation.

Click here to read more.

May 4, 2020

Federal Judge Refuses to Grant Restraining Order Against Arkansas Surgical Abortion Restrictions During Pandemic

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker refused to grant a temporary restraining order against Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson’s second executive order restricting elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

After Gov. Hutchinson's first executive order expired, she issued a new order aimed at starting to open up the state to business once again. There are three criteria elective surgeries must meet to be legal under the governor's new order:

1) The patient must test negative for COVID-19 48 hours before the procedure.

2) The surgery must be an out-patient procedure.

3) The surgical facility must have an "ample supply" of personal protective equipment.

The ACLU stepped in to challenge the requirements on behalf of Arkansas's only surgical abortion facility, claiming the requirements put too much of a burden on women seeking abortions. Without a temporary restraining order, a judge would have to hear the entire case and make a full decision if the ACLU were to press further to block the executive order.

Click here to read more.

May 1, 2020

137 Members of Congress Urge Supreme Court to Keep Planned Parenthood from Using Federal Courts to Get Medicaid Funds

Photo Credit: Joe Gratz / Flickr
On April 29, 137 members of Congress filed a brief with the Supreme Court asking them to keep third parties, such as Planned Parenthood, out of the decision-making process regarding which medical providers will be reimbursed with Medicaid funds.

Abortionists in states with pro-life governments have sued states in federal courts when state officials deemed that abortion businesses were not qualified to receive Medicaid funds. Circuit court judges have ruled on both sides of the issue. It is now up to the Supreme Court to determine which side of the circuit court opinions will stand.

“Planned Parenthood pulls in over a billion dollars a year, largely through Medicaid reimbursements, and the abortion giant has no qualms pursuing every penny of profit,” said National Right to Life President Carol Tobias. “It’s no surprise they are willing to go to court to keep their profit margin.”

Click here to read more.

Court Orders Pro-Life Undercover Investigators to Pay Over $1.5 Million in Baby Body Parts Case

Pro-Life Undercover Investigator David Daleiden
Credit: American Life League / Flickr
Following the six-week trial that took place in November of last year, a San Fransisco Judge has now ordered pro-life defendants sued by Planned Parenthood for recording conversations that were supposedly private to pay over $1.5 million. This number will be even larger once it includes Planned Parenthood's attorney fees.

The pro-life undercover investigators found to be "joint and severally liable" by the court include Operation Rescue President Troy Newman; David Daleiden, who became the face of the undercover investigation; Sandra Merritt; Albin Rhomberg; and Gerardo Adrian Lopez.

The undercover investigators working with the Center for Medical Progress released videos in 2015 showcasing their conversations with Planned Parenthood abortionists. The investigators posed as potential buyers for baby body parts, and abortionists working for Planned Parenthood detailed what their procedures were for procuring intact body parts from children. Some of these conversations revealed that abortionists would go out of their way to alter an abortion procedure to make sure body parts remained intact and usable by interested buyers.

The $1.5 million includes reimbursement for Planned Parenthood security upgrades the abortion company purchased after realizing they had been recorded.

Click here to read more.

April 30, 2020

Illinois Reproductive Health Act Fact 6: The State of Illinois Can Hide Abortion Information and Statistics

Before the Reproductive Health Act was passed, the public could request abortion statistics from the Health Department, which collects reports from every legal abortion in the state. The Reproductive Health Act created an exception to the Freedom of Information Act, however. Now, the state will hide information in these reports and could even keep abortion statistics from citizens. Learn more by clicking the link below:


GET THE FACTS - Click here to view or download this week's fact sheet.




Biden Calls Abortion "Essential Health Care" During Virtual Town Hall

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr
In a virtual town hall, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden called abortion "essential health care" and criticized state politicians for temporarily banning abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Finally, we need to ensure that women have access to all health services during this crisis,” Biden said, adding, “abortion is an essential health care service.”

“States should not be using public health crises to infringe on a woman’s constitutional right” to abort her child, the candidate later added.

The town hall was themed around the impact of COVID-19 on women and included a presidential endorsement from former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. During her time on screen, Clinton said, “every form of health care should continue to be available, including reproductive health care for every woman in this country.”

Biden's stance in favor of abortion is in stark contrast to President Donald Trump, who altered Title X funding requirements to prevent abortion businesses from taking that taxpayer funding. He also became the first sitting president to speak at the annual March for Life rally in Washington D.C earlier this year.

Click here to read more.

Louisiana Clinic Hospitalizes Woman While Defying Temporary Abortion Ban

Even during a state order that is supposed to temporarily shut down abortion businesses during the COVID-19 outbreak, an abortion clinic in Louisiana not only continued to do business but hospitalized a patient.

The Women's Health Center in New Orleans, Louisiana was supposed to be closed due to an emergency order from the state. Several states have chosen to ban elective medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic to slow the spread of the coronavirus and lessen the strain on medical equipment like surgical masks. Louisiana was one of those states, but abortionists continued business as usual.

On April 21, the Women's Health Center hospitalized one of its patients. A pro-life activist outside the clinic provided a photo to Operation Rescue showing an African American woman in a gurney being loaded into an ambulance. The organization attempted to learn more by filing a public records request, but it was rejected by the New Orleans City Attorney’s office.

Abortion clinics don't only hurt their patients when they continue their deadly procedures during a pandemic, they put an unnecessary strain on emergency medical workers and put even more people at risk.

Click here to read more.

April 29, 2020

Mother Shares Story of Arguing with Doctors Who Wanted to Let Her Son with Down Syndrome Die

Photo from Facebook
In an article she wrote for The Mighty, a mother named Jackie Tang told the story of how doctors repeatedly tried to convince her to abort her son or allow him to die by ending his treatment for his medical issues after his birth.

Tang had recently separated from her husband before learning she was pregnant. Doctors diagnosed her child with a heart defect, blockage in his bowels, fluid in the lungs, and a high chance of Down syndrome. They repeatedly pressured her to take tests that would confirm the Down syndrome diagnosis, but she refused.

"I was advised to get an amniocentesis test done before it was “too late” to terminate. I knew that the test would be invasive and risky, so I told the doctors that I was satisfied to work with the assumption that my baby did have Down syndrome. I told them that termination was out of the question."

As the diagnoses piled up, she was given a choice:

"I was told my baby was dying and would not survive to term. I was given three options: to let him die in the womb and deliver him stillborn, to have him delivered immediately with no likelihood of survival, or to prolong the pregnancy as much as possible by presenting at the hospital three times a week (from memory) for a few hours each visit, for steroid injections and monitoring of the baby’s heartbeat. I chose the third option."

Tang writes that her son, Noah, was born at 34 weeks gestation and required resuscitation. He underwent many medical procedures at the beginning of his life to treat numerous medical difficulties. His mother writes that doctors pulled her aside on multiple occasions even after his birth asking her to stop providing him medical care so they could let him die.

"[A doctor Tang refers to as 'doctor 2'] said she wanted to check in because most NICU parents start to question the wisdom of continuing treatment when they’re at the 6-8 week mark, and they start to feel that they need to get their life back on track. She wanted to give me the option to withhold treatment and let him die. I said that wasn’t me, and I didn’t care about the screaming, I wanted them to throw the book at Noah when it came to saving his life."

Noah is now 5 years old and has completely overcome many of his medical problems, but his mother says that he still faces discrimination.

Click here to read more.

Planned Parenthood in New York City Hospitalizes Patient During COVID-19 Pandemic

A Planned Parenthood clinic hospitalized a patient in New York City last week, forcing emergency medical workers in the largest hotspot in the country to respond to a completely unnecessary injury. 

Operation Rescue reported that the Margaret Sanger Planned Parenthood in New York City had to load one of its patients into a Mount Sinai Hospital ambulance on April 24, 2020. A video recorded by a pro-life bystander shows New York Fire Department personnel with an additional ambulance helping to load the patient into the Mount Sinai Hospital ambulance.

New York's state government ordered that all non-essential surgeries be postponed during the COVID-19 outbreak, but it falsely classifies abortion as an essential medical service. While many workers, including medical workers, lost their jobs during the outbreak, Planned Parenthood continues to profit from its deadly work.

April 28, 2020

US Bishop Calls Catholics to Stop Vaccine Research Using Aborted Babies

Photo Credit: St. Philip Institute / YouTube
Bishop Joseph Strickland of the Diocese of Tyler in Northeast Texas released a letter calling Catholics to oppose the development of COVID-19 vaccines using cells from aborted babies.

In his April 23 letter, the bishop wrote, “Tragically, people are not aware of or have chosen to turn a blind eye to the advances in medical science which allow vaccines to be developed with the wholesale use of aborted children’s bodies... Just because the crime of abortion is considered legal in our nation does not mean it is morally permissible to use the dead bodies of these children to cure a global pandemic. Emphatically, this practice is evil.”

The bishop elaborates that in his conversations with scientists he has learned of many other sources of cells that can be successful in the development of vaccines, including umbilical, placental, adult stem, and insect cells.

“As your Shepherd, I urge you to join me, NOW, in passionately but prayerfully speaking out against this practice,” Strickland wrote. “We must insist that legislators create legislation which establishes the illegal and immoral nature of any use of the remains of aborted babies for research. Further, we must insist that pharmaceutical companies comply with such legislation. I believe this can be a significant building block in a culture of life which eliminates the taint of economic gain that too easily infects the abortion industry.”

Click here to read more.

Abortion Pill Reversal Hotline Receives Surge of Phone Calls During COVID-19 Pandemic

Photo Credit: Maria Ionova / Unsplash
The Abortion Pill Rescue Network says it saw a record-breaking number of phone calls during the month of March. More mothers are calling to attempt to reverse the chemical abortion process than ever before.

According to Live Action News, Heartbeat International director of communications Andrea Trudden said that 105 mothers started the abortion pill reversal process during March. Heartbeat International runs the Abortion Pill Rescue Network, which helps inform women about abortion pill reversal and advise them through its hotline.

If a pregnant woman regrets taking the first dose of the abortion pill regimen, taking progesterone can give their unborn child a chance at life if done quickly enough. Mifepristone, the first part of the abortion pill regiment, causes the death of an unborn child by blocking a mother's natural progesterone. Progesterone is essential for the transfer of oxygen and nutrients from a mother to her unborn child. Taking progesterone before it's too late can allow a pregnant woman's body to restore the natural flow of nutrients and oxygen to her child before they die. The survival of the child is not guaranteed, but abortion pill reversal provides many children with a chance at life that would have otherwise been taken away from them.

The Abortion Pill Rescue Network's hotline is 877.558.0333

Click here to read more.

April 27, 2020

Mike Pompeo: US May Never Fund World Health Organization Again

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr
In an interview on Fox News, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the United States may never restore funding to the United Nations World Health Organization.

“It may be the case that the United States can never return to underwriting, having US taxpayer dollars go to the WHO,” he said. He later said that the administration would see if another organization could potentially replace the WHO.

This comes after the US suspended its funding for the organization, which normally receives $400 million US tax dollars annually (15% of the WHO's budget).

The WHO has been accused of helping China perform a coverup of the true dangers of COVID-19. The organization criticized the Trump administration's travel ban and disregarded signs of a dangerous outbreak originating in China.

Furthermore, the WHO declared that abortions should be an essential part of healthcare during the pandemic; showing that the United Nations continues to put its ideology before the well-being of others.

Click here to read more.

April 24, 2020

New York Issues and Later Rescinds Do-Not-Resuscitate Guideline

Photo Credit: Ben Roffer / Flickr
The state of New York issued guidelines on April 17 that emergency responders not attempt to resuscitate any person in cardiac arrest. After ample criticism from the public and from emergency responders, that guideline has been rescinded.

A New York State Department of Health issued a memo stated the directive was, “necessary during the COVID-19 response to protect the health and safety of EMS providers by limiting their exposure, conserve resources, and ensure optimal use of equipment to save the greatest number of lives.’’

First responders normally attempt to provide 20 minutes of CPR to a patient in cardiac arrest. If the directive were left in place, some first responders might have let people die without making an effort to revive them.

“Our job is to bring patients back to life,” said Oren Barzilay, head of the city union including EMTs and paramedics. “This guideline takes that away from us.”

The New York Department of Health said in a statement that, “... the recommendation of the Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, and reflected ‎nationally recognized minimum standards. However, they don’t reflect New York’s standards and for that reason DOH Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker has ordered them to be rescinded.”

Click here to read more.

Abortions Resume in Texas with Other Elective Surgeries

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott
Photo Credit: WTTC / Flickr
After a lengthy legal battle over the fact that abortions were included in Texas's ban on elective surgical procedures, they are once again available in Texas. The state is starting to make elective surgeries available to the public once again, which has the side-effect of opening abortion clinics. The clinics continue to push the narrative that they, and the women they serve, were treated unfairly by the temporary ban. The fact that they still get to open alongside other non-essential surgical procedures undercuts this narrative.

Planned Parenthood Texas Votes executive director Dyana Limon-Mercado told the Texas Tribune that, “[The] past month has been an unthinkable nightmare for Texans who have been forced to travel out of state just to access essential health care, if they’re able to access care at all.”

Citizens in many states haven't been able to access services they might want during COVID-19 shutdowns. Planned Parenthood's repeated claims that abortion should be an exception to the rule and apparent endorsement of interstate travel for the sake of abortion is selfish and disturbing. Abortion advocates are truly taking advantage of the COVID-19 outbreak to make political points when governors who place these temporary bans are only trying to keep people safe.

As much as pro-life advocates want abortion to end, pro-life governors will end these temporary bans as they open up their states for commerce once again. Governors are not legislating from their offices like the Supreme Court did in its Roe v. Wade ruling, and a true challenge to Roe v. Wade will come through the courts.

Click here to read more.

George Soros PAC Gives $1 Million to Pro-Abortion NARAL to Defeat Pro-Life Politicians

George Soros
Photo Credit: Niccolò Caranti / Wikimedia Commons
A George Soros-funded PAC named "Democracy PAC" gave $1 million to the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) Freedom Fund according to the fund's quarterly report with the Federal Election Commission earlier this month.

The NARAL says it will be spending $35 million to defeat Donald Trump and other pro-life politicians during the 2020 election cycle. The pro-abortion organization said it wanted to focus on persuading women and other groups who see reproductive rights as a major concern. It recently released an ad claiming the president and other pro-life politicians put "ideology over science" whenever they restrict abortion in any way.

The ad criticizes pro-life governors for putting temporary restrictions on abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic; claiming that they are simply trying to take advantage of the situation rather than save lives.

Click here to read more.

April 23, 2020

Appeals Court Upholds Arkansas Temporary Surgical Abortion Ban

Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore / Flickr
Three judges on the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals overruled a district judge's temporary restraining order against the Arkansas Department of Health's ban on surgical abortions for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic.

On April 3, the Arkansas Department of Health issued a directive requiring that all non-essential surgeries be postponed. District Judge Kristine Baker put a temporary restraining order on the directive, specifically creating an exemption for surgical abortions. Now, a three-judge panel from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has dissolved the temporary restraining order.

A statement from the Arkansas Attorney General's office:

“With the Eighth Circuit’s decision, there is no longer a judge-made exemption for surgical abortions. Every non-medically necessary surgery must be postponed. The Eighth Circuit also confirmed the procedurally suspect nature of allowing abortion providers to hand-pick the judge that hear their cases.”

“[The Eighth Circuit] agreed with Arkansas that the district court committed a clear abuse of discretion in creating a carve-out from state law for surgical abortions,” said Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge.

Click here to read more.

April 22, 2020

5th Circuit Court of Appeals Defeats Second District Court Restraining Order Against Texas

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive order temporarily banning non-essential surgical procedures includes abortion to help medical professionals conserve equipment like medical masks and stop COVID-19 from spreading in cramped abortion clinics. That order has been heavily contested by pro-abortion forces in federal courts, making its way up to the supreme court (decision pending).

District Court Judge Lee Yeakel attempted to undercut the higher courts by creating an exception to the order for chemical abortions (abortions completed using the abortion pill regiment), but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals overruled him on Monday:
We are persuaded by Petitioners’ arguments that the district court, in the April 9 TRO [Temporary Restraining Order], disregarded our mandate in Abbott II. The court again “fail[ed] to apply . . . the framework governing emergency exercises of state authority during a public health crisis, established over 100 years ago in Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. … Moreover, the court again second-guessed the basic mitigation strategy underlying GA-09 (that is, the concept of “flattening the curve”), and also acted without knowing critical facts such as whether, during this pandemic, abortion providers do (or should) wear masks or other protective equipment when meeting with patients. Those errors led the district court to enter an overbroad TRO that exceeds its jurisdiction, reaches patently erroneous results, and usurps the state’s authority to craft emergency public health measures “during the escalating COVID-19 pandemic.” 
Abortion advocates claim that chemical abortions are safe and should become more available during the COVID-19 outbreak so women can access abortion while social distancing. These people disregard the reasons that the federal government requires women to see doctors and receive a prescription before buying abortion pills.

Women receive ultrasounds to ensure that chemical abortion is a "safe" abortion method for the woman. If a pregnant woman has a condition known as ectopic pregnancy, in which their unborn child is positioned outside of the uterus, chemical abortion has a high risk of complications such as hemorrhage which can lead to death.

Click here to read more.

Illinois Reproductive Health Act Fact 5: Abortionists Won't be Disciplined for Performing "Abortions" on Women Who Aren't Pregnant

Due to changes made in the Reproductive Health Act, doctors will no longer be subject to any punishment by the state for performing an "abortion" on a woman who isn't actually pregnant. Doctors could previously lose their license for such conduct, but now they are free to conduct themselves in a manner that the law previously called "willful and wanton." Learn more by clicking the link below:


GET THE FACTS - Click here to view or download this week's fact sheet.


April 21, 2020

UN Official Criticizes "Liberal Eugenics" in Annual Report

Catalina Devandas Aguilar
Catalina Devandas Aguilar, a Costa Rican Lawyer and United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, recently submitted an annual report criticizing the increased adoption of ideals she describes as "ableism" and "liberal eugenics." In the report, she denounces practices such as euthanasia and abortion targeted at those with disabilities.

Here are some excerpts from the report:

“Indeed, ableist social norms and market pressures make it imperative to have the ‘best possible child’ with the best possible chances at life. Some utilitarian bioethicists have further argued that genetic enhancement is a moral obligation and that it is ethical to give parents the option to euthanize their newborns with disabilities.”

“Such practices may reinforce and socially validate the message that persons with disabilities ought not to have been born. Legislative frameworks that extend the time frame for a lawful abortion or, exceptionally, permit abortion in the presence of fetal impairment aggravate this message.

“In addition, as the consequence is a smaller number of persons with disabilities being born, some fear a reduction in disability advocacy and social support for persons with disabilities. Furthermore, health policies and abortion laws that perpetuate deep-rooted stereotypes and stigma against persons with disabilities also undermine women’s reproductive autonomy and choice.”

“From a disability rights perspective, there is a grave concern that legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide could put at risk the lives of persons with disabilities. If assisted dying is made available for all persons with a health condition or impairment, regardless of whether they are terminally ill or not, a social assumption might follow that it is better to be dead than to live with a disability.”

Click here to read her full report.