November 2, 2016

Americans don’t want to foot bill for killing babies

Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton
Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton
Politico-Harvard poll clearly indicates that Hillary Clinton supporters believe Medicaid should be reimbursing Planned Parenthood for abortions - but National Right to Life Committee president Carol Tobias tells OneNewsNow it also shows that a majority of Americans are opposed to it.

“Americans do not want their tax dollars to pay to kill unborn babies,” she says. “That hasn't changed in the 40 years that the Hyde Amendment has been law, and yet we know that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party platform are calling for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment so that tax dollars can be used to pay for abortion.”

“They [Planned Parenthood] are not a full-service medical facility or an organization,” she explains. “We have a lot of community health centers in this country that do provide full-service medical care for women, but they're not getting as much money as they could or should because it's going to Planned Parenthood.”

Click here for more from OneNewsNow.

Corrupt Clinton Foundation's Partnership with Planned Parenthood Promotes Abortion Around the Globe

Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation
Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation
Recent headlines discussing an open FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation have referred to it as a "money laundering scheme" where influence within the American government can be purchased - for a hefty price.

But there is also a lesser discussed aspect of the Clinton Foundation - one that is literally costing innocent lives. This Clinton Foundation program works to promote and expand abortion in third world countries in formal partnership with abortion supplier Planned Parenthood.

"While the Clinton Foundation doesn't seem to actually do much but enrich the Clinton family, it does do one thing, and that is abortion," said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue.

On the Clinton Foundation payroll is at least one Planned Parenthood abortionist. Nicola Moore calls herself a "fly-in abortionista." Based in Massachusetts, this traveling abortionist has spent stints working at Planned Parenthood abortion facilities across the country, wearing a mask in the likeness of one of the Three Stooges to conceal her identity.

Click here for more from Christian Newswire.

November 1, 2016

VIDEO: Donald Trump explains to EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo his journey to becoming Pro-Life

Raymond Arroyo interview on EWTN with Donald Trump
Raymond Arroyo interview on EWTN with Donald Trump
You can watch the exclusive interview Donald Trump gave to Eternal World Television Network (EWTN) host Raymond Arroyo here.

You can also read the full transcript at the National Catholic Register.

Here are a few highlights of a genuinely fascinating interview which aired on the Oct. 27 episode of EWTN’s “The World Over.” For single-issue pro-lifers, the first query that Trump responded to was to reiterate that he would nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court.

For newcomers, or those who haven’t heard Trump talk about his pro-life conversion, Trump tells Arroyo that there wasn’t a moment that changed his thinking and his heart on abortion.

Well, there are a number of moments, but one was a couple that I know very, very well — and you had a strong pro-life [person] and you had a strong pro-choice [person], and they argued over [the pregnancy]. … The mother was pregnant. They argued over the child. One, I won’t get into specifics. …But one wanted to abort. And the other said, “We can’t do that. We’re not going to do that.” Anyway, they had the baby. It was a long time ago. And the baby is such a magnificent person, who I know, a magnificent person. And the person that was actually pro-choice is now pro-life because of it, and it had a big effect on me. But I’ve seen other examples similar to that; but I’ve seen other examples, so …

Arroyo interjects, “So, it was a personal change for you?” and Trump responds

It is a personal change. And, you know, Ronald Reagan made that personal change, too. Many people have made the personal change. I mean, some make the personal change the other way, also. … But I made the personal change, and I’m very happy with it.



Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Fight for Free Speech, Conscience Rights Continues in California, Illinois

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represents pro-life organizations and individuals targeted by new laws in California and Illinois, filed legal challenges in both states late last week in an ongoing battle to keep the states from forcing the organizations to promote or refer for abortions.

In Illinois, ADF filed a motion for a preliminary injunction Thursday against a change in the state’s Health Care Right of Conscience Act designed to force all medical professionals, along with as many as 130 local pregnancy help centers and medical clinics, to refer their clients to nearby abortion clinics upon request of the patient.

Challenging the Illinois legislation—which was set forth as Senate Bill 1564 and signed into law July 29 by Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner—ADF appealed to state and federal Constitutional free speech protection, as well as Illinois’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act on behalf of two pregnancy help centers and a pro-life ob-gyn who would also be affected by the legislation if it were to go into effect Jan. 1, 2017.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

October 31, 2016

Facebook reverses course after first offering absurd reason to reject CPC ad

Birthright of Bel Air Facebook Ad
Birthright of Bel Air Facebook Ad
Ok, I grant you there is no necessary linkage. But…

(1) Facebook’s cofounder has pledged to give $20 million “to political groups that support Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton,” according to the Washington Post.

(2) That, as of May, “Facebook employees as individuals have donated more than $114,000 to Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton this election cycle, by far the most of any presidential candidate,” the Hill newspaper reported.

(3) Facebook turned down an ad from a Crisis Pregnancy Center for reasons that no one over the age of 6 would believe are genuine.

From WBFF, Fox News 45 Baltimore: Seems Birthright of Bel Air, a Harford County pregnancy aid center, wanted to do what many organizations routinely do : pay Facebook so its advertisement would reach a wider online audience.

But the word– the word which was delivered within 5 minutes of the request’s submission–was no.

So why did Facebook change its tune? Atha’s friends share the new ad on their personal pages–maybe that had an influence, she suggested. ( Or perhaps Facebook got wind a story might be coming out about its absurd decision.)

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

‘Big Bang Theory’ Acknowledges Life in the Womb: ‘There’s a Baby in There!’

Screen shot of CBS's Big Bang Theory episode titled "The Fetal Kick Catalyst"
Screen shot of CBS's Big Bang Theory episode
titled "The Fetal Kick Catalyst"
Well, sometimes even Hollywood can get it right in a pro-abortion world. Thursday night’s episode of The Big Bang Theory acknowledges what should be obvious: being pregnant equals a baby.

“The Fetal Kick Catalyst,” opens with Howard (Simon Helberg) and Bernadette (Melissa Rauch) sleeping together. Howard rests his hand on Bernadette’s pregnant stomach and wakes up with great joy as he feels their baby’s kick. “There’s a baby in there,” he finally realizes.


After all, it was only a few months ago when NARAL objected to a Doritos ad that featured an ultrasound because it was “humanizing fetuses.” I can only imagine what they think of one of the biggest comedies in America “humanizing” a fetus by calling it a baby and showing it kick, especially when they’ve spent so much time defending late-term abortion after the last presidential debate. Pro-aborts have been so effective at dehumanizing human fetuses that it’s easy to forget we’re talking about living human beings.

So, hats off to CBS for showing that it’s not simply a fetus, but a person.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Pure, Selfless Love Saves Baby from Abortion on New CBS Drama ‘Pure Genius’

Screen shot of CBS’s new medical drama, Pure Genius
Screen shot of CBS’s new medical drama, Pure Genius
CBS’s new medical drama, Pure Genius, opened its series on Thursday with a pro-life message that was quite powerful.

Bunker Hill is opened as the most innovative hospital in the world, headed up by billionaire James Bell (Augustus Prew). Mr. Bell aims to partner futuristic technology with medicine to create an experience no other facility can provide.

Dr. Walter Wallace (Dermot Mulroney) is invited to visit Bunker Hill by Mr. Bell in hopes of getting him to join their staff. Dr. Wallace isn’t too sure of the hospital’s methods as they seem much different from what he’s used to.

Many patients are brought in and treated for various procedures. One such patient is Margot Beyer and her husband, Paul. Margot has a tumor that needs to be removed, but refuses radiation or chemotherapy because she is pregnant. The Beyers argue they will not consider abortion as an alternative, as Dr. Zoe Brockett (Odette Annable) suggests.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Grey’s Anatomy’ Uses Bad Medicine to Push Abortion on Dying Cancer Patient

Screen shot of ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy, episode titled “Roar"
Screen shot of ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy, episode titled “Roar"
In Thursday’s episode of ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy, titled “Roar,” a brave, determined pregnant cancer patient took a pro-life stance rather than be bullied into an abortion by the doctors at Grey-Sloan Memorial Hospital.

During a random, casual conversation in a courthouse security line between a pregnant woman in her sixteenth week named Veronica and Dr. Alex Karev (Justin Chambers), Karev noticed a rash on the pregnant woman’s hands and encouraged her to seek medical attention.

At the clinic later, test results showed Veronica had stage 4 pancreatic cancer – a terminal diagnosis – with less than a year to live, even with treatment. Unfortunately, the pressure began immediately for her to have an abortion so that her chemo and radiation could begin. Dr. Miranda Bailey (Chandra Wilson), Chief of Surgery, was not receptive to an alternative procedure that would try to keep the baby alive long enough to be born. She only saw one patient, when she should have seen two.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

October 27, 2016

Dear Samantha Bee: Unfortunately, skull-stabbing is ‘a thing’

If there’s one thing you can count on from the media, it’s that when a pseudo-celebrity says something stupid that celebrates abortion, it will be lauded from the deserts of the Huffington Post to the wastelands of Salon.com as one of the most brilliant, prescient, and also hilarious monologues ever uttered by a kind-of-famous alleged comedian. Just lately, it’s been Bill Nye the Science Guy, Trevor Noah—he’s the guy at the Daily Show in charge of creating waves of nostalgia for Jon Stewart—and now, Samantha Bee, who hosts a charming show called “Full Frontal.”

Bee took umbrage at Donald Trump’s rather blunt description of partial-birth abortion as “ripping a baby out of the womb of its mother.” Bee and the rest of the media hive immediately went in to full damage control, lest anyone realize the gruesome truth about the procedure Hillary has spent her life promoting. Bee’s resulting monologue immediately garnered quite the buzz, as her friends in the media cackled with relief over her apparent “takedown” of Trump’s abortion comments.

Click here for more from LifeSiteNews

Hillary’s wrong again—Harvard poll shows strong Majority of Americans oppose using Medicaid funds for abortion

Pro-abortion Hillary Clinton
Pro-abortion Hillary Clinton
The list goes on and on and on. The public doesn’t agree with abortion maven Hillary Clinton on her support for partial-birth abortions and late term abortions, and her opposition to a ban on partial-birth abortion and parental involvement—to name just four items.

An a poll conducted for POLITICO Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health released today shows that she is on the wrong side of still another abortion-related issue. Americans overwhelmingly do not want their tax dollars syphoned off to pay for abortions. The margin among likely voters was a whopping 22 points—58% to only 36%.

Why is this significant? Because the question is really asking about the Hyde Amendment, a provision that is attached to the annual appropriations bill that covers many federal health programs (including Medicaid), which has stood the test of time and which Clinton and the Democrat Party is dead-set on eliminating. To quote the Democrat Party platform, “We will continue to oppose—and seek to overturn—federal and state laws and policies that impede a woman’s access to abortion, including by repealing the Hyde Amendment.”

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

What does it mean to be pro-life?

Every human being matters, and we ought to act accordingly

By Paul Stark via National Right to Life

The media often use the label “anti-abortion” to describe pro-life advocates. It’s true that we oppose abortion—and infanticide, euthanasia and embryo-destructive research. But we are only against those things because we are for something else.

What we are for

What are we for? We are for the proposition that human life is good, that it is worth living, that it deserves respect and protection. We are for the proposition that every human being has an equal worth and dignity—that every human being has a right to live.

The pro-life position rejects all attempts to divide humanity into those who have rights and those who don’t. Our society now recognizes that past discrimination on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity and social status was deeply unjust. We recognize that the worth of a human being does not depend on such characteristics.

Nor, however, does the worth of a human being depend on age, size, ability, dependency, stage of development or the desires and decisions of others. The big are not more valuable than the small. The strong do not have more rights than the weak. The independent do not matter more than the vulnerable and needy.

No, we have value and a right to life simply because we are human—not because of what we can do, but because of what (the kind of being) we are. That’s why everyone matters. Everyone counts.

What we are against

It is because we support equal human dignity that we oppose the intentional killing of innocent human beings. And that means we oppose abortion, infanticide, euthanasia and embryo-destructive research.

Pro-lifers oppose abortion because it takes the life of a human being before he or she is born. The scientific facts of embryology and developmental biology make clear that the unborn (the human embryo or fetus) is a distinct and living human organism, a full-fledged (though immature) member of the species Homo sapiens. Each of us was once an embryo and a fetus, just as we were once infants, toddlers and adolescents.

And all human beings, at all stages, have a right to life, whether or not they are “wanted” or “convenient.”

We oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide because killing is never the answer to the difficulties of life. All human beings should receive our compassion and care, irrespective of disease, disability or perceived “quality of life.”

We oppose embryonic stem cell research (but not adult or non-embryonic stem cell research) and human cloning because they require the destruction of human embryos. Human embryos are human beings in the embryonic phase of life. And all human beings, regardless of appearance or location (e.g., a petri dish), ought to be treated with respect and not as mere raw material to use for the hypothetical benefit of others.

Living our conviction

But being pro-life is about more than just holding an ethical position. To be truly pro-life means to live and act accordingly.

It means treating other people with dignity and respect—even those with whom we disagree. It means helping pregnant women in need and those who suffer from illness or disability.

It means recognizing the moral gravity and scale of abortion—the premier injustice and leading cause of death in American society today—and taking action to save lives. Educating ourselves, talking to others, persuading them. Supporting pro-life educational and legislative efforts through organizations.

Being pro-life, ultimately, is about loving others, especially the most vulnerable. It is about loving our neighbors as we love ourselves. And love isn’t just a feeling. It is a commitment.

October 26, 2016

United Nations: Promotion of Access to Abortion for Refugees and Migrants

The United Nations General Assembly during the first ever Summit for Refugees and Migrants adopted the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants which “expresses the political will of world leaders to save lives, protect rights and share responsibility on a global scale.” The Declaration includes commitments “to address current issues and to prepare the world for future challenges, including, among other things, to start negotiations leading to an international conference and the adoption of a global compact for safe, orderly and regular migration in 2018.”

A close examination of the noble sounding declaration, however, reveals that one group will not have their lives saved or their rights protected-unborn children.

In a long list of commitments, the Declaration regrettably includes in point #31 a commitment to “provide access to sexual and reproductive health-care services”. Abortion is considered by most to be a “reproductive health-care service”.

The following day, the insidious promotion of abortion was confirmed as a draft companion set of principles was released by Kate Gilmore, UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights and a former director of Amnesty International. Gilmore explained that the Principles and Guidelines, supported by practical guidance, on the human rights protection of migrants in vulnerable situations within large and/or mixed movements is meant to provide “brave principled leadership” to put the ideals expressed in the Declaration into practice.

One section is especially troubling for its inclusion of abortion. Principle 12: “Right to health” states in Guideline #4:

“Provide access to rights-based, comprehensive and integrated sexual and reproductive health information and services, including, inter alia, safe and effective methods of modern contraception; emergency contraception; maternal health care including emergency obstetric services, pre- and post-natal care; safe abortion care; prevention, treatment, care and support for sexually transmitted infections including HIV, and specialized care for survivors of sexual violence. Provide, as a priority, a minimum initial service package for reproductive health.”

The 20 draft principles are being developed by Global Migration Group’s Working Group on Human Rights and Gender which is co-chaired by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and UN Women, two UN entities known for pro-abortion activism.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Famous rapper rejects abortion, celebrates infant daughter’s brief life

 Puerto Rican rapper Wisin (Juan Luis Morera Luna)
 Puerto Rican rapper
Wisin
(Juan Luis Morera Luna)
Late last month, Puerto Rican rapper Wisin (Juan Luis Morera Luna) took to social media to announce the passing of his one-month-old daughter, Victoria. Victoria was diagnosed in utero with Trisomy 13, a terminal chromosomal abnormality. Many parents who receive trisomy diagnoses are pressured to abort their children, and Wisin and his wife, Yomaira, were no exception.

In a statement shared by Puerto Rican media, Yomaira explained that aborting their daughter was never an option:

“Victoria has fulfilled every single one of her purposes since the day that we found out about her,” Yomaira said. “We give thanks to God for our decision to have her without caring what would happen, because we know that God knows what is best.”

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

October 25, 2016

Hillary supports abortion ‘at 9 months’: Trump doubles down in new interview

In a new interview, Donald Trump doubled down on his criticism of Hillary Clinton for supporting late-term abortion.

“If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby,” Donald Trump said. “Now, you can say that that’s okay, and Hillary can say that that’s okay, but it’s not okay with me because based on what she’s saying and based on where she's going and where she's been, you can take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb in the ninth month on the final day, and that’s not acceptable.” 

Click here for more from LifeSiteNews.com

O’Reilly is right: We have no moral authority if we don’t protect the preborn

Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly of The O’Reilly Factor addressed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s stance in favor of late-term abortion from Wednesday night’s debate.

In his Talking Points Memo to open the program, he mentioned:

Now, it’s somewhat shocking and I mean that, shocking, that Hillary Clinton would support late-term, partial-birth abortion citing the health of the mother. As we saw in Kansas and in Pennsylvania, the health of the mother could be anything. There are corrupt doctors who will abort for money on the most flimsy of physical excuses. In a humane country, the unborn must be protected to some extent by the government. Otherwise, we don’t have any moral authority on anything.



Click here for more from LifeSiteNews.com

Baby LynLee Hope, born twice, survives risky in utero surgery and is now thriving

The Boemer Family
The Boemer Family
Imagine, if you can, what was going through Margaret Boemer’s mind. The Lewisville, Texas mom had already lost one of her unborn twins before the second trimester when doctors recommended she abort the second twin.

Why? Because the baby girl, who was by then 16-weeks old, had a tumor on her spine, according to Elizabeth Koh of the News Tribune:

The tumor, they told her, was a sacrococcygeal teratoma, a rare tumor affecting one of up to 70,000 births. It was drawing blood away from her baby and could cause heart failure before she was born.

But Boemer and her husband flatly refused.

Often such surgery is postponed until after the baby is born, but that was not an option. “At 23 weeks, the tumour was shutting her heart down and causing her to go into cardiac failure, so it was a choice of allowing the tumour to take over her body or giving her a chance at life,” she told the BBC. (A sacrococcygeal teratoma is a tumor that grows from an unborn baby’s tailbone.)

“It was an easy decision for us: We wanted to give her life.” She added, ““We knew that if we didn’t choose the option of emergency surgery that night, that within a day or so she would pass.”

Still, doctors gave the baby, Lynlee Hope, only a 50-50% chance.

And the surgery, performed at Texas Children’s Fetal Center, proved to be extremely complicated. Lynlee Hope almost died.

According to Koh,

The complicated and risky surgery nearly went awry as doctors tried to remove the tumor with a “huge” incision, said doctor Darrell Cass, who was part of the operation. The baby, weighing just 1 pound and 3 ounces during the surgery, was “hanging out in the air” as they cut away the mass and her heart nearly stopped — though a cardiologist kept her alive.

LynLee Hope Boemer
LynLee Hope Boemer
Doctors then placed Lynlee Hope (who weighed 1lb 3oz at the time of the surgery) back in her mother’s womb, and sewed up the opening. Twelve weeks later–on June 5–she was delivered again, this time by Caesarean section, weighing 5 pounds and 5 ounces.

Lynlee subsequently underwent a second surgery to remove the remaining tumor on her spine. Now four months old, “Baby Boemer is still an infant but is doing beautiful,” Darrell Cass, the co-director of the Texas Children’s Fetal Centre told the BBC.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

October 24, 2016

Life-Saving Center, Mobile Ultrasound Unit Awaiting Free Speech Ruling in Illinois

From left to right, Liz Feehan (administration), Amanda O’Neil (Mobile Unit Director), Tiffany Staman (Executive Director), Wymetta Crull (Nurse), Aimee Orem (Director of Education) and Karyn McDonald (Center Director). Missing is Simone Locklund, Nurse Manager.  Photo Courtesy: Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford
From left to right, Liz Feehan (administration),
Amanda O’Neil (Mobile Unit Director),
Tiffany Staman (Executive Director),
Wymetta Crull (Nurse),
Aimee Orem (Director of Education)
and Karyn McDonald (Center Director).
Missing is Simone Locklund, Nurse Manager.
Photo Courtesy: Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford
A lawsuit was nowhere on Tiffany Staman’s radar when she joined Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford (Illinois] as executive director back in 2014.

But, two years later, that’s exactly where Staman and her center find themselves, as named plaintiffs in a lawsuit against Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner challenging his ratification of a law this summer that attempts to force pro-life pregnancy centers like Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford to refer for abortions.

Rewriting the state’s Healthcare Right of Conscience Act to compel as many as 150 pregnancy help locations (the law’s broad language leaves its scope undefined) to keep an updated list of local abortion providers available to clients upon request, Democrats passed the bill on a party-line vote before Gov. Rauner—a Republican—signed it into law at the end of July.

Just days after the law—set to go into effect Jan. 1, 2017—was signed, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed a lawsuit in state court, representing Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford, as well as another pregnancy help organization, Aid for Women, and a life-affirming ob-gyn.

While Staman and her center, along with their fellow plaintiffs, await the next steps in the lawsuit, ADF also filed suit in a federal court, representing National Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), along with three more Illinois pregnancy help centers and an ob-gyn.

Amid the challenge in the courts to what ADF argues is a “classic example of compelled speech in violation of… Free Speech rights as protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution,” Heartbeat International—a network of over 2,000 pregnancy help organizations to which Pregnancy Care Center belongs—has urged its Illinois affiliates to refuse to comply with the law.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Clinton's radical abortion 'wall' alienates Latinos

With a little more than two weeks until the election, presidential candidates are making their final pitches to voters across the U.S. – and pro-lifers are still talking about the stark differences between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the abortion issue. Trump articulated his pro-life beliefs clearly; Clinton was just as clear on her support for abortion:

Clinton: "I strongly support Roe v. Wade. In this case, it's not only about Roe v. Wade. So many states are putting very stringent regulations on women that block them from exercising that choice. I will defend Planned Parenthood. I will defend Roe v. Wade."

"She constructed an impermeable wall that alienates her from the Latino electorate and from the Christian electorate with her unbridled support of abortion, including late-term abortions," Rev. Samuel Rodriguez of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference explains.



Click here for more from OneNewsNow.

The Sanger Hillary doesn't want voters to know

Margaret Sanger
Margaret Sanger
Even though many pro-life advocates and African Americans called Clinton to reject and denounce the Margaret Sanger Award she received in the not-so-distant past, the former first lady ignored such pleas in order to press forward with her extremist pro-abortion agenda and champion the so-called “women’s reproductive rights” movement.

With the 2016 election also coinciding with Planned Parenthood’s 100th anniversary, more attention is being drawn to Sanger’s 1947 video that resurfaced in 2014, where the notorious eugenicist made the demand for “no more babies” to be born in developing nations for 10 years.

During the last election year, Sanger was named (postmortem) one of TIME magazine’s 2012 “20 Most Influential Americans of All Time” – the same year President Barack Obama, who pro-life leader Dr. James Dobson dubbed “the abortion president,” won his second straight election bid.

Click here for more from OneNewsNow.

Trump hit a very sensitive nerve when accurately describing Clinton’s abortion extremism

Pro-Life Donald Trump and Pro-Abort Hillary Clinton during the 3rd presidential debate.
In talking straightforwardly about Clinton’s extremist times two position on abortion, Donald Trump had struck a very sensitive nerve.

The story line is that Trump implied there is a torrent of late-term abortions–and by “late,” critics mean the last week.

He said nothing of the sort. Trump talked about what Hillary Clinton has said–and how she had voted as a United Senator. There weren’t hypotheticals, these were indisputable facts and logical conclusions Trump rightly drew from Clinton’s behavior.

For example, questioned by Fox News moderator Chris Wallace, Clinton didn’t deny she’d voted [multiple times, in fact] against a ban on partial-birth abortions. Instead, as pro-abortionists always do, she skipped acknowledging that and immediately went to the most extreme cases, even though–as NRLC pointed years ago– Ron Fitzsimmons, the executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, told the New York Times in 1997: “In the vast majority of cases, the procedure is performed on a healthy mother with a healthy fetus that is 20 weeks or more along.”

How about her backup escape clause–the need for a “health exception”? Even abortion advocates, when pressed, on occasion will grudgingly acknowledge that this “exception” is infinitely elastic: there is no abortion for which an “exception” cannot be found.

What about Trump’s comment after Clinton responded, which pro-abortion critics jumped on?

Well I think it is terrible. If you go with what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month you can take [the] baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the birth of the baby. Now, you can say that that is okay and Hillary can say that that is okay, but it’s not okay with me. Because based on what she is saying and based on where she’s going and where she’s been, you can take [the] baby and rip the baby out of the womb. In the ninth month. On the final day. And that’s not acceptable.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.