January 18, 2011

Planned Parenthood an 'absolute farce'

Planned Parenthood an 'absolute farce'

As an exploratory committee looks into the possibility of a conservative radio commentator running for president in 2012, the prospective candidate is sharing his thoughts on social issues.

Herman Cain explains that the committee is considering the amount of support he is likely to receive -- including financial support. Meanwhile, the businessman and radio host is sharing his thoughts on social issues, including whether he would work with Congress to defund Planned Parenthood.

"I absolutely would defund Planned Parenthood -- not because I don't believe in planning parenthood, [but because] Planned Parenthood as an organization is an absolute farce on the American people," he notes. "People who know the history of Margaret Sanger, who started Planned Parenthood, they know that the intention was not to help young women who get pregnant to plan their parenthood. No -- it was a sham to be able to kill black babies."

He points out that anyone who needs more proof on that truth should look no further than where Planned Parenthood clinics are located, as "75 percent of all Planned Parenthood facilities are located in black neighborhoods."

Aside from the abortion issue, Cain has supported the military's ban on homosexuals and says he would have never repealed it as president. As for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA - a proposed bill that would prohibit "discrimination" against workers on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity), the conservative commentator explains that he "would veto that relative to special rights to homosexuals."

Cain made his comments Monday afternoon on American Family Radio's Focal Point program.

Contact:
Chris Woodward
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: January 18, 2011

Dropped lawsuit doesn't appease pro-life group

Planned Parenthood Sign

A probe of Planned Parenthood continues in Iowa, even though the abortuary chain has dropped its lawsuit against Operation Rescue.

About three months ago, Operation Rescue spokesperson Cheryl Sullinger asked the Iowa Board of Medicine to release the public records of several employees and abortionists involved with Planned Parenthood in in the state. The abortion provider then sued to block access, even though the records are public. But just before the discovery phase was to begin, it withdrew the lawsuit.

"That means that we can ask them questions and they can ask us questions, and it appeared to us that they were more afraid to answer our questions," Sullinger accounts. "They came to the conclusion [that] it was better just to let the public records be released, rather than answer the questions."

But she points out that the flow of records to Planned Parenthood, including information from the attorney general's office, has yet to be resolved.

"We know that the attorney general has very, very close ties with Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and that he has actively acted to block independent investigations into what we believe is criminal activity on their part," the Operation rescue spokesperson notes.

That is a reference to the clinic's "telemed" abortion method, which dispenses RU-486 to patients without a doctor present. Meanwhile, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller is currently under an ethics investigation.

Contact:
Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: January 18, 2011

‘A Banner Year’ for Pro-Life Bills

'A Banner Year' for Pro-Life Bills

Lawmakers in Kansas, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri and Kentucky are drafting bills similar to Nebraska's to protect preborn babies starting at 20 weeks gestation.

The statehouses in New Hampshire, North Carolina and Ohio added to their pro-life ranks in November, which could mean greater protection for preborn life.

"State pro-life legislation represents our best present opportunity to reduce the number of abortions and limit access to it," said Carrie Gordon Earll, senior bioethics analyst at CitizenLink. "Moving the legal ball forward for the pro-life cause requires pro-life majorities in state legislatures because that's where the action is."

Even abortion activists were forced to agree that this will be an important year.

"Thanks to the gains by conservatives in the Nov. election, 2011 will be a banner year for anti-choice legislation in the states," Donna Crane, policy director of NARAL Pro-Choice America, told Women's eNews.

* New Hampshire: Republicans, who enjoy a veto-proof majority in the House and Senate, plan to introduce parental-notification legislation. In 2007, Gov. John Lynch repealed the state's parental-notification law.

* North Carolina: Incoming House Speaker Thom Tillis has pledged to pursue legislation to limit the number of abortions performed in the state, specifically through an informed-consent requirement.

* Ohio: With huge Republican majorities in both chambers, pro-life members have placed priority status on legislation to ban late-term abortions.

* Maryland: Despite heavy Democratic majorities in the Senate and House, Republican Rep. Michael Smigiel is working to outlaw interstate abortions — in which an abortion could be initiated in a neighboring state and be completed in Maryland.

Earll concluded: "Polls find Americans are supportive of these incremental laws as a way to reduce the number of abortions, a reflection of increasing pro-life sentiments among the public."

Contact:
Jennifer Mesko
Source: CitizenLink
Publish Date: January 17, 2011

Roe vs. Wade: Day of Infamy

Roe vs. Wade: Day of Infamy

The following is submitted by Rev. Rusty Lee Thomas:

January 22, 1973 is another day besides December 7, 1941, that shall live in infamy in American history. On this day, 38 years ago, the Supreme Court decriminalized the sin and crime of abortion. Tragically, they struck down every law in America that protected preborn children from those who would arbitrarily harm them in the sanctity of their mother's womb. With a stroke of the pen, the safest place for a child waiting to be born, instantly became the most dangerous. For nearly sixty million American children, the womb, which God created to nurture life became the tomb in which they died.

Roe vs. Wade is not only a bad legal decision that codified evil into law, but stands as a tribute to the basest aspects of our fallen human nature. It enhances the life of the strong at the expense of the weak. It protects large people as they victimize little people. With impunity, it allows parents to do the unspeakable to their own offspring. In the name of law, Roe vs. Wade established the foulest injustice in American history.

Roe vs. Wade not only violates God's Law, "Thou Shalt Not Murder," but also betrays our national covenant which states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

For 38 years and counting, America has refused to uphold our first and foremost fundamental right, which is the right to life. No other rights as Americans are secure, if this right is denied. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and the freedom of the press are of no consequence to a dead baby.

Roe vs. Wade is a national tragedy that far exceeds the abominable practice of slavery. It should remind every American that we are failing once again to live up to our own creed. As a result, millions of little American citizens waiting to be born are finding to their horror that the "American Dream" has turned into a deadly nightmare.

Moreover, Roe vs. Wade raises a question that must be urgently answered in these tumultuous times. Can a nation that denies life and freedom to its most vulnerable citizens be worthy of life and freedom themselves?

Lastly, Roe vs. Wade is above all an urgent call to our blood-stained nation to repent of this national sin. Keep in mind that national sin brings national calamity. The many woes suffered by our nation today can be attributed to this spiritual reality. Therefore, to secure a future and a hope, the American holocaust must end. It is my sincere prayer that abortion not only become illegal once again, but like slavery before it, may it become unthinkable in the United States of America.

Contact:
Rev. Rusty Lee Thomas
Source: Elijah Ministries
Publish Date: January 18, 2011

It's good news that the over-population myth is crumbling

It's good news that the over-population myth is crumbling

Dominic Lawson of The Independent newspaper has written an excellent article using the latest information to debunk the over-population myth (about which I blogged several times in 2009: 15 Jan, 30 May, 1 June, 28 Aug, 20 Nov, 29 Dec). Do read his article in full. Mr Lawson writes:

"the experts are coming round to the view that it has all been one giant false alarm".

He cites a number of useful new sources, including:

* Dr Tim Fox, Institution of Mechanical Engineers: 'We can meet the challenge of feeding a planet of 9 billion people through the application of existing technologies'

* "[D]etailed report on "sustainability" published last week by the French national agricultural and development research agencies came up with the same answer."

* "Joel Cohen, the professor of populations at Columbia University's Earth Institute, told National Geographic: Those who say the whole problem [of climate change] is population are wrong. It's not even the dominant factor.'"

Mr Lawson argues cogently that fear of the earth being over-populated is based on misanthropy and hype. This is good news, because that misanthropy and hype will eventually crumble, giving way to what Lawson calls "rational optimism" and thus to protection of the unborn, the disabled and the elderly. The culture of death is narrow, negative and dangerously foolish. The culture of life is open, positive and confidently real. The pro-life movement, the planet and its peope have a bright future - however dark the passing cloud of the over-population myth.

Contact: John Smeaton
Source: SPUC
Publish Date: January 18, 2011

January 17, 2011

Abortion - an issue of the unborn's civil rights



     Abortion - an issue of the unborn's civil rights

In observance of Martin Luther King Day, pro-lifers are focusing in part on a major civil rights issue.
 
Joseph Parker (right), pastor of two African-Methodist-Episcopal churches in Mississippi, says today's culture often overlooks the critical questions and issues related to life and the unborn. Instead, he says, people tend to avoid pushing their moral views on others or agree that it is up to a woman to decide what she should do with her body.

"Tragically, this kind of argument has become just a smokescreen that has kept too many from really seeing the true issue at hand," Parker laments. "The false claim has been that the abortion issue is about women's rights and reproductive freedom, but this is simply marketing hype and lies. In reality, it was racism and eugenics that drove the legalization of abortion."

More than 30 percent of abortions that take place in the U.S. involve the killing of black babies -- a truth clearly portrayed in a documentary called Maafa 21, which was produced by Life Dynamics. A group of black pastors will show that film today at its "Festival for Life" at Wesley Biblical Seminary in Jackson, Mississippi.

"One of the great needs in our society is to recognize that there's a huge need for us to take a stand for the civil rights of the unborn child [and] that the civil rights of the unborn need to be respected and protected," Parker concludes.

     

Click here for the video.

He goes on to point out that Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King, Jr., describes standing up for the rights of the unborn as one of the most serious civil rights issues of our time. The Mississippi pastor recently spoke at a rally in Jackson, where he voiced his agreement with that statement. (View YouTube video above)

Contact: 
Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: January 17, 2011

Teens taking the torch in crusade for life



     Teens taking the torch in crusade for life

The teen division of a national pro-life group plans to have a strong presence at the March for Life in Washington later this month.
 
More and more young people participate in the annual event every year, which takes place around the anniversary of the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion. This year's event is scheduled for January 24.
 
Jake Dagel, international youth director of Pro-Life Unity's Teen Defenders project, explains why young people have gotten so focused on the issue. "Oftentimes in the movement, we as teenagers are going to end abortion -- not necessarily the adults," he notes. "And so we are looking at a way to make teenagers feel empowered and to let them know through the power of Christ how possible it is for them to end abortion. So we are taking all of our initiative through the power of Christ in helping teenagers help end abortion."

He says Teen Defenders has already received endorsements from major organizations for this year's march.

"We're hoping to pull in at least 15,000 teenagers, rally them up, [and] let them know how empowered they are, and we're going to walk them into the March for Life area," Dagel reports. "We're going to do our best to get everyone informed about this and make a big statement that the teenagers are the face of the movement and it's the teenagers who are going to end abortion -- not necessarily overnight, but hopefully really, really soon."

He goes on to point out that the abortion movement continues to tell teenagers lies, but young people are becoming increasingly aware of the fact that one-third of their generation has been lost to abortion.

Contact: 
Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: January 17, 2011

Fighting to restore a culture of life



     Fighting to restore a culture of life

A campaign launched in Los Angeles this week seeks to raise awareness to what is becoming known as "black genocide" -- the devastation occurring in black America as result of abortion.
 
It's modeled after a highly successful similar campaign conducted in Atlanta earlier this year by Georgia Right to Life and the Radiance Foundation.
 
According to just released data from the Guttmacher Institute, 1.21 million abortions were performed in the United States in 2008. Some 30 percent of these abortions were performed on black women. With blacks accounting for about 12 percent of the U.S. population, the tragic disproportionate rate of abortion in this community is clear.
 
Seventy billboards will be posted around Los Angeles, with focus on neighborhoods with high percentage black population. The billboards show the face of a beautiful black child with a headline that says: "Black Children are an Endangered Species."
 
The campaign is timed to coincide with March for Life, which notes the anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, and with black history month in February.
 
Abortion, of course, is a plague on the whole nation. But, as with all problems, the most vulnerable communities get hit the hardest.
 
A widely held assumption in our national discourse today is that there are "economic issues" and "social issues" that are separate, unrelated concerns. The fact that many actually believe that our nation's economic vitality has nothing to do with the condition of the American family or our general attitudes toward life and personal responsibility is a symptom of rather than an answer to our problems.
 
Realities in black America speak to this issue. The 25 percent of this population in which poverty is entrenched and passed on from generation to generation is the portion of the population in which traditional family structure has been most broken and lost.
 
Study after study, for instance, shows that the biggest factor in earning power is education and the biggest factor in educational success is family background and the values prevailing in the home of the child.
 
A Rand study concluded that $500 billion would be added annually to our GDP if test scores of black and Latino children reached national averages.
 
Anyone who has overcome a personal background of a broken and dysfunctional family can testify to how important family is in a child's life. Often those who dismiss its central importance take for granted the values transmitted to them from their families and arrogantly take complete personal credit for their success.
 
Personal responsibility is central to a functioning free society. The Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion, enshrining sex for amusement and the illusion of sex without consequences, was a frontal assault on our culture of personal responsibility.
 
In 1969, three years before Roe v. Wade, 68 percent of Americans said premarital sex is wrong. Today 32 percent say it is wrong.
 
Removing marriage as the framework for sex and children has produced results that don't surprise. There have been 50 million abortions since 1973. And we've gone from 10 percent of American babies born to unwed mothers in 1970 to 40 percent today.
 
A black child has a 50-percent chance of being aborted and, if born, a 70-percent chance of living in a single-parent home.
 
Planned Parenthood, which provides a third of our nation's abortions, gets $300 million annually from the federal government that they use to set up in black neighborhoods to perpetuate this dismal reality.
 
The Issues4Life Foundation and the Radiance foundation are fighting back. The idea is that the beginning of solving any problem is building awareness.
 
The goal for the billboard campaign is to plant seeds in the minds of blacks and all Americans that the future for all of us can only be in a culture of life, family, and personal responsibility.

Contact: 
Star Parker
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: January 17, 2011

'Morning-after' pill blamed for upswing in abortions



     'Morning-after' pill blamed for upswing in abortions

The American pro-life community is looking to future challenges after a recent Guttmacher report on abortion.
 
The report for 2008 shows a slight increase in the number of abortions in the U.S. up to about 100,000 per month. Jeanne Monahan of the Family Research Council tells OneNewsNow that RU-486, the abortion pill, played a role in the totals.
 
"Interestingly, [chemical abortions are] more expensive than surgical abortions," she notes. "So I find that fascinating just in as much as they're touted as being easier on women, which is absolutely not true."
 
She cites a study showing that emotionally and physiologically, chemical abortions are actually harder on women. "But you know, of course, [when] a woman thinks of taking a pill...that sounds sort of more attractive [and] easier to her," she adds, suggesting a possible financial incentive as well for the manufacturers of the more costly abortion regimens.
 
Monahan comments on another area -- the ban on partial-birth abortions, a method of late-term abortions, that was outlawed but that continue to be done by abortionists using other methods. The report shows 23 percent of abortionists offered the terminations after 20 weeks of pregnancy -- three-percent increase -- and 11 percent offered abortions after 24 weeks.
 
"I guess the work to be done specifically in that area would be stricter state laws on gestational ages," she remarks.
 
In addition, many states are considering passage of a Nebraska-type law that bans abortion after 20 weeks on the basis of proven fetal pain. The battle lines have already been drawn, and the pro-life movement is gearing up to meet those challenges.
 
Abuse, after-effects of 'morning-after' pill in U.K.
Statistics in Great Britain show a growing dependence on the "morning-after" pill.
 
The poll found 20 percent of women using the pill in the past year, and a quarter-million women using the so-called "emergency contraceptive" two or more times during the reporting period. In addition, some 18- to 21-year-olds use the morning-after pill as their normal form of contraception.
 
Proponents had claimed, before its approval, that the pill would only be used as an emergency, according to Wendy Wright of Concerned Women for America. (Listen to audio report)
 
"Sadly, women are unwittingly taking this drug, assuming that it would be safe and would have no detrimental effects on them or their possible unborn child," he shares. "But it's simply unknown what kind of effects it could have."
 
Wright suggests that women and young girls have been victimized by turning them into the equivalent of human guinea pigs.
 
"And there isn't full knowledge [about the pill] because there's not been adequate testing to find out what kind of effects it will have on women," laments the family advocate. "So the abortion proponents are using women to promote their own political agenda."
 
And that agenda, she explains, is to promote drugs and devices that can cause abortion and blur the line between contraception and abortion, the objective being to cause more people to accept abortion.

Contact: 
Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: January 16, 2011

Twenty-somethings taking the pro-life reins



     Twenty-somethings taking the pro-life reins

Tweeting and texting, the Echo Boomers are taking the reins of the decades-long effort to restore legal protection to the unborn across the U.S.

These 20-somethings – children of Baby Boomers and Generation Xers – were born and raised after the 1973 Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade. They are survivors of the era of legalized abortion in America. But a full third of their generation did not survive – 26 million of their brothers, sisters and friends have been aborted.

For those who made it, like 28-year-old Christine Kurka of Eagle River, Alaska and 22-year-old Windy Thomas of Anchorage, the abortion debate is about human rights – rights they believe should be equally applied to all members of the human family, including the very youngest.

At age 18, Kurka was motivated to speak up for the unborn. Her awakening came during a visit to the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C., where she heard recordings of the Nuremberg trials. She understood that apathy, silence and the deflection of responsibility were no defense in the face of evil.

"If we say nothing, we are acquiescing," Kurka told the Catholic Anchor in a recent interview.

Kurka began to see a correlation between the destruction of the Jewish people behind the walls of concentration camps and abortion.

"It's a quiet thing, people don't see it," she explained.

She realized "it wasn't going to be enough to just personally stay away from abortion or not to have one myself. I was going to have to be actively speaking and doing something."

As the 38th anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches on Jan. 22, the faces and voices of the pro-life movement are changing. But in terms of political action, charity towards mothers and babies and efforts to educate the public on the facts of prenatal life, Kurka's generation is following a well-proved path.

Pro-life predecessors


While a growing number of Alaska's pro-life activists aren't out of their 20s, they have four decades of experience behind them.

Anchorage Catholic Pam Albrecht has been at the forefront of the abortion debate since 1969, when Planned Parenthood first lobbied Alaska's legislators to legalize abortion. With help from local attorneys Wayne Ross and Bob Flint, Albrecht produced flyers opposing the legalization and urged Alaskans to write their legislators.

However, the legislation passed, and in 1972 Alaska amended its constitution to become one of the first states to explicitly recognize a so-called right to "privacy," interpreted by some to mean a right to abortion on demand.

Meanwhile, Albrecht began to appreciate how women were being pressured into abortion.

"I could see this problem was more than just 'this baby'," said soft-spoken Albrecht.

So she and fellow Catholic Kim Syren founded Birthright – to help expectant mothers in crisis choose life for their babies by providing friendship and material support, like housing and clothing.

Eventually, Birthright was folded into Catholic Social Services' Pregnancy Support program. And Albrecht continues on with Project Rachel, helping mothers suffering after abortion.

Mirroring the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, other early pro-life advocates took the abortion debate to Anchorage clinic doors in the 1980s. Local pro-lifers organized peaceful sit-ins to slow the abortion business in Anchorage and raise awareness of what was going on inside. Ninety-two people joined the first sit-in, making it the largest civil disobedience event in the history of Alaska. A photo of the arrest of Jesuit Father George Endal, in his 80s at the time, made the front page of the Anchorage Times.

On the sidewalks were "sidewalk counselors," pro-lifers specially trained to engage with the abortion-minded and help them find life-affirming options.

Still, today, members of the Legion of Mary, a Catholic lay apostolate, continue to pray on the sidewalks several times a week and offer help to women outside Alaska Women's Health, P.C. – an abortion facility on Lake Otis Parkway.

Most young adults are pro-life

Thirty years later, in an age where the term "partial-birth abortion" is familiar and where prenatal ultrasounds are commonplace, the American people — including young adults — are increasingly pro-life.

A 2010 Marist College poll showed that nearly 60 percent of the nation's 18-to-29-year-olds consider abortion morally wrong. Just 20 percent of that group thinks abortion is morally acceptable.

Thousands of pro-life young adults demonstrate against Roe v. Wade in the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C. Their numbers impress even Nancy Keenan, president of the pro-abortion advocacy group NARAL, who in Newsweek Magazine observed, "There are so many of them, and they are so young."

These youth are founding and running groups like Live Action, the undercover investigative group that films exposés on Planned Parenthood, the nation's billion-dollar abortion business. Its now famous director Lila Rose, who delivered the keynote address for this past November's Alaska Right to Life fund-raiser, is just 22 years old.

There are Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust; Medical Students for Life; and Stop the Abortion Mandate Coalition, a national coalition organized to stop government funding of abortion in health care.

In Anchorage, Christine Kurka initiated a local chapter of 40 Days for Life. The campaign is a biannual, international event in which participants stand vigil in front of abortion clinics across the country and pray and fast for the end to abortion. Since its 2007 start, the group's headquarters reports 3,592 unborn babies saved from abortion as a result.

Kurka also is volunteer coordinator for Alaska Right to Life. She organizes the group's activities at the Alaska State Fair and its annual fund-raiser. And she has been on the board, which consists mostly of young adults, including her 23-year-old brother Christopher.

Changing hearts and minds

Kurka appreciates the courage and devotion of her pro-life predecessors. And she agrees that a presence outside abortion clinics keeps the focus on "real issues."

"Yeah, there are some issues of law," she said, "but there's also an issue of people's hearts – everybody who's driving by, the people who are working in the clinics, the women who are potentially seeking abortions, the rest of society that condones it or pressures them to have abortions."

Kurka believes praying and counseling outside the abortion facilities is "very effective at bringing people together to really focus on what's true — that human life is valuable and it's valuable because we're created in the image of God — and we need to express that in our community."

Education is a critical part of the process, believes 22-year-old Windy Thomas. She helped found the student pro-life group at University of Alaska, Anchorage, and she is currently the communications director at Alaska Right to Life.

Thomas takes a lesson from Martin Luther King Jr.

African Americans had been "tortured and killed and treated so terribly," said Thomas. "The (Civil Rights) movement just brought it out into the open and showed people, 'This is how it is. This is not okay.'"

Thomas believes she has a responsibility to do the same for the unborn. "Twenty or thirty years ago, we didn't have the scientific evidence that we have now," she said. Sharing the facts about prenatal development — that each unborn baby, from the moment of conception, is distinct and irreplaceable — is essential, she believes.

"This battle is going to be won in people's hearts first, but people really have to believe abortion is murder. People really have to see it as it really is."

Education can be a long process. But in the meantime – and facing 1.2 million abortions in the U.S. each year – Thomas is confident.

"You can really make a huge difference if you just, like, speak up," she said. "And if you're faithful and dedicated, you can change the world."

Contact: 
Patricia Coll Freeman
Source: CatholicAnchor.org
Publish Date: January 16, 2011

Abortion Lobby Gives America a ‘D’ Grade for ‘Reproductive Rights’



     Abortion Lobby Gives America a 'D' Grade for 'Reproductive Rights'

The United States earned a "D" grade for women's "reproductive rights" by the pro-abortion advocacy group NARAL Pro-Choice America in its annual report, released on Friday.

In the report,  The Status of Women's Reproductive Rights in the United States, is a "report card" where each state and the nation as a whole are graded using a point system based on "anti-choice" and "pro-choice" governors, laws, access to contraceptives and abortions, spousal and parental consent and "post viability abortion restriction" on abortion.

States receiving the highest grades include an "A+" for California, which NARAL says has a pro-choice governor, senate and assembly. The state was also lauded for giving low-income women access to abortion.

The state of Washington also got an "A+", while Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, and Oregon received an "A."
States given an "A-" were Alaska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York and Vermont.  The District of Columbia also got an "A-."

The states receiving an "F" in the report are Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Virginia.

The states are also ranked according to the point system, with California ranking No. 1 for "reproductive rights" and North Dakota earning the No. 50 spot.

The report methodology explains that the nationwide score is based on both state restrictions and federal "anti-choice" laws, such as the Federal Abortion Ban, signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2003; the Federal Refusal Clause of the 2004 Abortion Non-Discrimination Act that protects health professionals who are opposed to abortion; and restrictions on abortions for women in the U.S. military.

The 109-page report's "key findings" section shows what NARAL considers the increase of "anti-choice" laws that have been enacted over the years. In 1995 (the earliest year reported) there were 18 "anti-choice" measures enacted. In 2010 (the last year reported), there were 644 measures enacted nationwide.

Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL, cites the negative effects of the mid-term elections in the report's "From the President" letter.

"It is clear that the results of the 2010 elections could pose serious threats to the progress we celebrated in previous years' reports," Keenan says. "Some of our key pro-choice champions in Congress and in the states are not returning to their positions.

"Some of their successors hold the most extreme anti-choice views ever seen," said Keenan. "And these changes mean women's access to safe, legal abortion and other reproductive-health care could be further jeopardized. Our opponents will attempt to equate their election with presumed public support for anti-choice policies."
"They are wrong," she said. "Americans are focused on our nation's economic challenges."

"We all know friends and family members who are struggling -- and we also know these individuals do not want politicians to wage a divisive war on choice when they are facing such financial hardships," Keenan said.
This is the 13th year that NARAL's publication has included a report card on the states and the nation.
NARAL's 2011 "Report Card on Women's Reproductive Rights," by grade, is presented below.

A+
California
Washington

A
Connecticut
Hawaii
Maine
Maryland
Oregon

A-
Alaska
District of Columbia*
Montana
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Vermont

B
West Virginia

B-
Illinois
Massachusetts

C+
Colorado
Delaware
Iowa
Minnesota

C-
Wisconsin

D+
North Carolina
Rhode Island
Wyoming

D
Arizona
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee

D-
Kansas

F
Alabama
Arkansas
Idah
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Utah
Virginia

* The District of Columbia is the capital city of the United States overseen by the federal government.

Contact: 
Penny Starr
Source: CNSNews.com
Publish Date: January 14, 2011 

January 14, 2011

Commemorating Anniversary of Reagan's Personhood Proclamation



     President Ronald Reagan  "...the inalienable personhood of every American from the moment of conception until death." - President Ronald Reagan

23 years to the day after President Ronald Reagan released his Personhood Proclamation, Personhood USA is unveiling a pivotal new video echoing Reagan's call for Personhood rights for all human beings. 

Reagan's Personhood Proclamation was made on January 14, 1988, and declared that "... protection of the innocents must be guaranteed and that the personhood of the unborn be declared and defended throughout our land." 

Personhood USA's new video decries the evil of abortion and uses President Reagan's own words to affirm the personhood rights of unborn children. The video can be viewed atwww.personhoodusa.com. Now in all 50 states, Personhood USA is seeking to recognize the Personhood rights of every innocent human being. 

"President Ronald Reagan understood the simple truth that all human beings are persons," explained Keith Mason, cofounder of Personhood USA. "It is basic science that tells us that the child in the womb is a human being, and all human beings are persons with a right to life. Reagan knew in 1988 what we still know now -- that abortion stops the beating heart of a living human being. This new video was produced to bring awareness to the critical need for Personhood Amendments in every state."

Contact: 
Keith Mason
Source: Personhood USA
Publish Date: January 14, 2011

Commentary: ‘My Preborn Baby is a Living, Breathing Human Being’



Nebraska broke new ground on the pro-life front when its fetal-pain law went into effect in October. The law protects babies after 20 weeks unless the mom's life is in danger. And it has been successful in forcing notorious late-term abortionist Leroy Carhart to leave the state.

Lawmakers in Kansas, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri and Kentucky are drafting bills similar to Nebraska's to keep Carhart from moving in. Most states ban abortions after 24 weeks, with narrow exceptions.

At the center of the debate is the issue of when a preborn baby begins to feel pain.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says it has no evidence that preborn babies experience pain at 20 weeks.

Dr. Paul Ranalli, a neurologist at the University of Toronto, disagrees.

"At 20 weeks, the fetal brain has the full complement of brain cells present in adulthood," he says, "ready and waiting to receive pain signals from the body, and their electrical activity can be recorded."

Baby Schleicher at 19 weeks.
Baby Schleicher at 19 weeks.

Monica Schleicher, director of media and public relations for CitizenLink, knows firsthand how preborn babies react to stimuli: She is 25 weeks pregnant.

My husband and I have marveled at the miracle of life unfolding before our eyes. No longer do I theoretically talk about a child developing in the womb; I now feel life quicken and move inside of me. This new dimension of reality is one that has had far-reaching implications for me as a Christian, a voter and an advocate of life.

As I fall deeper and deeper in love with our preborn daughter, the tragedy of abortion has also been made more real. To think that, at 25 weeks along, I would still be able to get an abortion breaks my heart — after all, she is not just "a clump of cells" or "pregnancy tissue."

No, my preborn baby is a living, breathing human being who I know and love. She helps her "not-a-morning-person" momma wake up at 6 a.m. by doing a little dance. She naps while I sit at my computer during the work day, but loves to deliver well-placed kicks and punches during management staff meetings.

Monica at 20 weeks.
Monica at 20 weeks.

Baby Schleicher made me laugh over Christmas break when she got the hiccups after experiencing her daddy's spicy gumbo, and she's been entertaining us by making my belly twitch with her increasingly strong movements.

Science and technology bear out what I know to be true: My daughter can react to and interact with the outside world. If I drink a cold beverage, I can expect her to wake up and move about. She's been able to sense light since 15 weeks, moving away from a flashlight shining at mom's tummy. Some research suggests she's been hearing my voice since about 19 weeks. While loud noises have been startling her since about 17 weeks, once she's born she shouldn't be fazed by sounds she hears regularly, like a vacuum cleaner.

I have chronicled some of these developments on Facebook:

Oct. 1 (10 weeks): The baby was super active during the ultrasound, wiggling around and "dancing." Also, during the first part of the ultrasound, the baby had the hiccups so it was cute to see his/her whole little body "jump" up.

Nov. 1: All pants should have elastic waistbands.

Nov. 4 (15 weeks): We had an ultrasound today … and the technician was more than 90 percent sure IT'S A GIRL!!!!!!!

Nov. 22: (18 weeks): OK, so more and more I am believing that what I feel is the baby moving!! Such delicate little "flutters" made me second-guess myself numerous times, but it is happening too much for it not to be her. I'm completely in love! ♥

Nov. 30: Confirmed — it's most definitely a girl! Bill and I praise the Lord for a wonderful, perfect 20-week ultrasound with everything going as it should be.

Dec. 6: Our sweet baby girl is starting to get so active! More and more, I feel her moving around.

Dec. 13: 21 weeks this Wednesday, and (she) is making her presence more and more obvious with stronger kicking movements that are happening more and more often a day.


The iPad application "Hello, Baby" 
provides a window to the womb at 21 weeks.


Dec. 15: A 21-week-old preborn baby moves about 50 times an hour, even when s/he is asleep! Awwww…

Dec. 20: Bill felt the baby kick for the first time a few minutes ago!!! She totally bonded with her daddy :-)

Dec. 30: Apparently, leftover gumbo gives the baby hiccups …

Jan. 3: Bill and I SAW the baby move for the first time!!!!!! How awesome to SEE my belly "twitch" and to know it's our little baby girl!!!! Every day I fall more and more in love with her.

Jan. 5: 24 weeks today! Baby Schleicher continues to grow, and all the books say my uterus is now the size of a soccer ball. Niiiiiice.

Jan. 9: Washing Baby's clothes, blankets and bed linens and putting them in storage. I love preparing for her!

Source: CitizenLink
Publish Date: January 13, 2011

Captain America Anti Suicide Campaign Undermined by American Culture



     Captain America Anti Suicide Campaign Undermined by American Culture

I am all for trying to prevent suicide.  Apparently the comic book character Captain America is on the case in a story called "A Little Help."  From the story:

Captain America's latest foe is deadlier than the Red Skull: suicide. The character armed with his trademark shield faces off against suicide in a new story that publisher Marvel Entertainment has released Wednesday for free through its website and app. The toll-free hotline for the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline is featured in the work, too. Entitled "Captain America: A Little Help," the 11-page story is written by psychologist Tim Ursiny, and illustrated by Nick Dragotta. In it, a despondent youth is poised to jump off a building when he spies Captain America facing a bevy of villains on a nearby roof. The fracas keeps him from going over the edge, literally and figuratively.

There is no dialogue, save for the end, which ends with the boy both saving the hero and, in the process, himself.

That's good. But we have, shall we say, a societal disconnect–a paradoxical message sent like unremitting tinnitus with much more force than a laudable comic book story.  On television, in the movies, and in the news, pro suicide advocacy is ubiquitous–including in some of the publications praising the Captain America campaign.  Million Dollar Baby comes to mind. The drive to legalize assisted suicide is all the rage in the media.  Giving Jack Kevorkian hero status with a puff bio-pic, starring an A-list movie star as K can't be helpful to turning people away from self destruction.  Many crime and medical dramas promoting assisted suicide and euthanasia.  And that doesn't include the nihilism that permeates youth culture.

So you go Captain America!  Too bad you have so many others putting cultural impediments in your way.

For those interested, here's the actual comic that is accessible to all without charge.

Contact: 
Wesley J. Smith
Source: Secondhand Smoke
Publish Date: January 13, 2011

Study: Contraceptives raise abortion rate



     Contraceptives raise abortion rate

A newly published study in Spain shows increased use of contraceptives did not result in a decrease in abortions.

The report in the January issue of the medical journal Contraception showed contraceptive use in women of childbearing age rose by 30 percent -- 49.1 percent to 79.9 percent -- from 1997 to 2007. The rate of elective abortions, however, more than doubled from 5.52 to 11.49 per 1,000 women.

The results fly in the face of the conventional wisdom espoused that greater use of contraceptives reduces the abortion rate.

The study authors offered some possible explanations for this apparent incongruity, including improved abortion reporting, but said in conclusion, "The reasons for the increasing rate of elective abortion warrant further investigation."

Pro-lifer Christina Dunigan wrote about the results at her blog RealChoice: "Researchers scratched their heads in bewilderment, likely because they don't understand risk compensation. If you reduce the perceived risks of a behavior, people will compensate by behaving in higher-risk ways.

She added, "The Pill Pushers have chosen to ignore the data, and the reality of how human beings work. The more you create an environment in which people perceive sex as low-risk, the more people will engage in risky sex."

Contact: 
Tom Strode
Source: Baptist Press
Publish Date: January 13, 2011

The Lessons Learned from Passage of the "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act"



     
     
NRLC Director of State Legislation Mary Spaulding Balch (left) 
       and Julie Schmit-Albin, Nebraska RTL Executive Director


Pro-lifers will remember 2010 for many reasons. Legislatively, at or near the top of the list of accomplishments was passage of Nebraska's "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" (LB 1103). This historic Nebraska law prohibits elective abortion at and after 20 weeks of pregnancy, at which time there is substantial medical evidence that the unborn child can feel pain. Key to its passage was the combined diligence and expertise of Nebraska Right to Life Executive Director Julie Schmit-Albin and NRLC Director of State Legislation Mary Spaulding Balch. The following is a Q & A with Julie.

Q: What are the lessons you took away from your experience passing the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act?

A: When you have a concept and you know what the end goal is, don't deviate from the language of the original draft, if at all possible. Fortunately we had the best sponsor--our Speaker, Mike Flood--who is an attorney and knew the case law in and out. Speaker Flood led the way in laying down the best possible legislative record in both committee and in floor debate, which is key in case your legislation is legally challenged. And a legal challenge of innovative abortion law is almost a given. However, the fact that LB 1103 has not yet been challenged speaks to the solid record laid down by Speaker Flood and his fellow pro-life senators--and how seriously worried pro-abortionists are that a legal challenge might boomerang.

Q: You attended NRLC's State Legislative Strategy Conference. We heard that one of the principal state legislative initiatives will be laws modeled on LB 1103. What did you come away from that December 7 conference thinking?

A: It solidified my belief that Mary Spaulding Balch is one of the very top legal minds in the country working on pro-life legislation. You can't go wrong sticking with Mary's guidance and the tremendous assistance provided by NRLC staff. Over the years legislators in Nebraska have come to realize that Mary knows her stuff, and that NRLC will back them up all the way. The fact that our "Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" sent abortionist LeRoy Carhart [who specializes in performing abortions late in pregnancy] packing ought to cement in peoples' minds that Mary is a brilliant strategist.

Q: Was there ever a point where you felt that LB 1103 was in mortal danger?

A: There were several attempts to weaken the bill which would have changed the whole essence of what we were trying to accomplish. This is something we always have to guard against. Sometimes the most well-intentioned amendments can effectively neutralize the bill and you don't want to be in the position of not realizing this until after the fact. In many ways legislation passed in the states is driving the public debate. Each legislative debate potentially means the real facts about abortion get clearly laid out. And because the truth is being revealed, public opinion is shifting to the pro-life side.

Q: Planned Parenthood of the Heartland is behind so-called "web-cam" abortions which are currently being performed in Iowa. Based in Iowa, it also operates abortion clinics in Nebraska.

A: We will fight its spread to Nebraska. With web-cam chemical abortions they hope to overcome two of their biggest obstacles: access and lack of abortionists who are willing to do surgical abortions. The abortionist is not in the same room with the woman; he could be hundreds of miles away. He opens a drawer electronically from which the woman takes misoprostol and mifepristone--the two drugs that make up the RU486 chemical abortion technique. PP of the Heartland is polluting a legitimate form of health care delivery--consultations over web cams--to increase access, especially in geographically rural states. This ties into PPFA's new national business model. They want to spread their tentacles reaching into counties which have never seen a Planned Parenthood clinic. They hope that if they increase the numbers of chemical abortions done through a video conferencing system, it will further corrupt the practice of medicine and "mainstream" abortion as just another "service."

Contact: 
Dave Andrusko    
Source: National Right to Life
Publish Date: January 13, 2011

Guttmacher Reports Abortion Rate Breaks its Downward Trend


     Guttmacher Institute

The Guttmacher Institute just released its latest analysis of national abortion statistics.  They found that the 2008 abortion rate was 19.6 per 1000 women between the ages of 15 – 44, with the annual total of abortions reaching 1,212,400 (an increase of 6,000 abortions from 2005 when the rate was 19.4 abortions per 1000 women).

As usual, this former affiliate of Planned Parenthood immediately concluded that more access to birth control was needed to prevent increasing abortions.  That conclusion ignores certain key facts.  Even abortion advocates had observed back in 2008 that abortions were increasing because of the downturn in the economy hurting people financially.  Might that alone account for the increase that has now been determined two years later? 

However, Americans United for Life pinpoints two other important factors that generated upward pressure on the abortion rate.  As the largest abortion provider in the nation Planned Parenthood's abortion total increased from 305,310 in 2007 to 324,008 in 2008.   That is 18,698 more abortions, which is over 3 times the national increase of 6,000 abortions. 

What was Planned Parenthood doing to increase their abortions?  They were opening new mega abortion facilities (e.g. in Aurora IL) and expanding the number of locations that commit RU-486 abortions.  With this greater availability of abortions, would not an increase be expected?  That certainly happened in Illinois.  As I just recently reported, the Illinois counties near the Aurora facility experienced significant increases in abortions, while abortions went down in other areas of Illinois. 

It appears reasonable to conclude that abortions are continuing to fall except in regions where Planned Parenthood, and possibly other abortion providers, are increasing the availability of abortions with expanded facilities and greater use of RU-486, sometimes even without the need to see a doctor in person (e.g.telemed abortions in Iowa).

Contact: Bill Beckman
Source: Illinois Review

January 13, 2011

Pence Introduces Bill to De-Fund Planned Parenthood, Walsh Co-Sponsors


     Congressman Joe Walsh
     Congressman Joe Walsh

Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN),
has introduced a bill, HB217 that would deny Title X federal family planning funding to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers:
It is morally wrong to end an unborn human life by abortion. It is also morally wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use them to promote abortion at home or abroad.

Last year, Planned Parenthood received more than $363 million in revenue from government grants and contracts. During that same time, they performed an unprecedented 324,008 abortions.

The largest abortion provider in America should not also be the largest recipient of federal funding under Title X.

The Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act will prevent any family planning funds under Title X from going to Planned Parenthood or other organizations that perform abortions. It will ensure that abortion providers are not being subsidized with federal tax dollars.
Pence boasts over 120 co-sponsors to this bill, including our own Joe Walsh (R-IL), of the 8th District.

I spoke with Congressman Walsh today, and he told me:
This is one of the first pieces of legislation that I'm a co-sponsor on, and it's an honor.

You know as well as I do that Planned Parenthood receives an idiotically high amount of funding from the government, and they continue to perform an unprecedented number of abortions.

If there's anything like a common ground on this issue, it's that public money shouldn't be used to fund abortion. It's a privilege and an honor to co-sponsor this bill.
Congressman Bob Dold (R-IL), of the 10th District, ran on a platform that included opposition to public funding of abortion, although Dold identifies himself as being pro-choice. According to Pence's office, Dold is not a co-sponsor of this bill, and a call to Dold's office asking the Congressman's position on this bill has not been returned.

Mike Pence's remarks on the House floor introducing the bill:


Click here for the video

Source: Lake County Righ to Life
Publish Date: January 11, 2011

Important Scientific Journal Article Published on Drugs like RU-486 and Ella

     Important Scientific Journal Article Published on Drugs like RU-486 and Ella

The January 2011 issue of the Annals of Pharmacotherapy contains an important "commentary" piece – unfortunately not free ($25.00) – discussing the advent, workings, and possible effects of progesterone receptor modulators like mifepristone (RU-486) and ella (ulipristal).  The article was written by Donna Harrison, M.D. (President, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists) and James G. Mitroka, Ph.D. (Associate Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lloyd L Gregory School of Pharmacy, Palm Beach Atlantic University) and is entitled, "Defining Reality: The Potential Role of Pharmacists in Assessing the Impact of Progesterone Receptor Modulators and Misoprostol in Reproductive Health."  In part, it is directed toward pharmacists who may see the adverse events associated with these drugs.  Here is the abstract:

Medical abortion is increasingly heralded as an ideal method for decreasing maternal mortality in health-care resource-deprived areas and as an answer to the shrinking pool of physicians willing to perform abortions. The advent of progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) and the recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration of ella (ulipristal) as an emergency contraceptive put pharmacists in the center of abortion controversy. Pharmacists, worldwide, need to be aware of the controversy surrounding the introduction of PRMs, particularly with regard to the effect on health policy, their mechanism of action, associated adverse events, and common off-label uses. Once understood, genuine opportunity exists for pharmacists to serve a fundamental role in positively shaping public health policy.

A key sentence describes the potential abortifacient of ulipristal in humans:

Based on these data, it can be reasonably expected that the [FDA approved dose] will have an abortive effect on early pregnancy in humans.

And the possibility of embryological effect is noted as well:

    Whether ulipristal is used intentionally or unintentionally by pregnant women, any surviving embryo may be exposed to an embryotoxic agent for >6 days, as the half-life of ulipristal acetate is approximately 32 hours.


The authors note that a fetal registry for ulipristal survivors needs to be established to track long term health defects in that there is a predictable 5% pregnancy rate for those who have taken the drug.  Hopefully, more writing will be done with regard to these aspects of ulipristal and its abortifacient effects.

Contact:
Chris Gacek
Source: FRC Blog
Publish Date: January 12, 2011

Voila! Vanderbilt drops abortion demand


1 day after complaint filed, nursing students freed from requirement

     Vanderbilt University logo

Only one day after a complaint filed by a team of Christian attorneys over Vanderbilt University's requirement that nursing students pledge to participate in abortions, the requirement has been dropped.

A statement from Alliance Defense Fund today confirmed the school "modified" its nurse residency application "so that it no longer requires applicants to pledge that they will participate in abortion procedures."

The ADF said the school's announcement came in an e-mail to applicants just a day after the ADF filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

"Christians and other pro-life members of the medical community shouldn't be forced to participate in abortions to pursue their profession. That's what federal law says, and that's why Vanderbilt is doing the right thing in changing its policy and application," ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman said in a statement today.

"We will be monitoring the situation to make sure the university continues to comply with the law. It's ironic that Vanderbilt changed its policy one day after denying that it required the pledge," he said.

The school announcement said there had been some publicity about a "misconception" about the school's practice.

"While Vanderbilt expects all health care providers, including nurses who participate in the Nurse Residency Program's Women's Health Track, to provide compassionate care to all patients, no health care provider is required to participate in a procedure terminating a pregnancy if such participation would be contrary to an individual's religious beliefs or moral convictions," the school said.

However, the ADF had complained about a Women's Health Acknowledgment Letter that is one page of a 16-page application that the applicant must sign:

"Often women are faced with many difficult decisions about their lives and health care. Nurses in the Center for Women's Health support women through these decisions and provide professional evidence based care specific to each situation. One difficult decision women face is termination of pregnancy. If you are chosen for the Nurse Residency Program in the Women's Health track, you will be expected to care for women undergoing termination of pregnancy," the application letter originally read.

The application letter added that if the candidate could not sign the letter, they should consider applying elsewhere.

"It is important that you are aware of this aspect of care and give careful consideration to your ability to provide compassionate care to women in these situations. If you feel you cannot provide care to women during this type of event, we encourage you to apply to a different track of the Nurse Residency Program to explore opportunities that may best fit your skills and career goals," the letter added.

The letter that was to have been signed by the candidate concluded with this acknowledgment.

"By signing this letter, I acknowledge that I am aware that I may be providing nursing care for women who are having the procedures listed above that may be performed in the Center for Women's Health," the letter concluded.

Bowman had explained the Vanderbilt policy violated the law providing that any institution receiving federal grants cannot force, coerce or otherwise require an individual to assist in abortions.

"No entity which receives, after September 29, 1979, any grant, contract, loan, loan guarantee, or interest subsidy under the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Community Mental Health Centers Act [42 U.S.C. 2689 et seq.], or the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 [42 U.S.C. 15001 et seq.] may deny admission or otherwise discriminate against any applicant (including applicants for internships and residencies) for training or study because of the applicant's reluctance, or willingness, to counsel, suggest, recommend, assist, or in any way participate in the performance of abortions or sterilizations contrary to or consistent with the applicant's religious beliefs or moral convictions," the law stated.

In a statement one day earlier, Vanderbilt University Medical Center spokesman John Howser said the ADF was mistaken.

"Allegations by the Alliance Defense Fund that Vanderbilt's nursing students, or other employees of the Medical Center, are somehow required to participate in terminations of pregnancy or in other activities that may be contrary to the employee's religious beliefs or moral convictions appear to have arisen due to a misunderstanding by the Alliance Defense Fund," the statement said.

The statement added that Vanderbilt's Medical Center has a religious freedom policy in place.

"A Vanderbilt University Medical Center policy has been in place for years for employees, including nurse residents, so they may be excused from participating in activities due to religious beliefs, ethical beliefs or other associated reasons," Howser's statement continued.

The ADF said it had filed the complaint with the federal government on behalf of two fourth-year nursing students who wished to move to Vanderbilt but could not because of the prior requirement.

It said since Vanderbilt gets more than $300 million a year in federal tax dollars, and federal law prohibits grant recipients from forcing students or health care workers to participate in abortions contrary to their religious beliefs or moral convictions, the policy needed to change.

Source: WorldNetDaily
Publish Date: January 13, 2011

Planned Parenthood: affiliates must do abortions


      Planned Parenthood: affiliates must do abortions

Planned Parenthood Federation of America, the country's leading abortion provider, has made a move that will likely increase its share of the market in the lethal procedure by requiring each of its affiliates to offer abortions in at least one clinic.

A Planned Parenthood spokeswoman confirmed abortions will be provided in a clinic of each affiliate in the country, The Daily Caller reported. A waiver may be acquired, however, in the case of "unique local circumstances," said Lisa David, a senior vice president for the organization.

Planned Parenthood Federation of America has 95 affiliates and 865 health centers, according to its latest annual report, which covers the 2008-09 fiscal year. Under the new rules, at least one clinic per affiliate must perform abortions, a Planned Parenthood spokeswoman told The Daily Caller.

The 2008-09 report showed Planned Parenthood received $363.2 million in government grants and contracts during the year. Its affiliates performed more than 324,000 abortions in 2008, the latest year for which statistics are available.

News about Planned Parenthood's new requirement broke when its affiliate in Corpus Christi, Texas, withdrew from the organization and changed its name. The affiliate became Family Planning of the Coastal Bend on Jan. 1, according to the Corpus Christi Caller-Times.

Amanda Stukenberg, chief executive officer of the Corpus Christi chapter, said the affiliate had never provided abortions because local doctors performed them.

Pro-life blogger Jill Stanek, a former nurse whose testimony helped in passage of the Born-alive Infants Protection Act in 2002, wrote, "I imagine that inside the industry, abortion wars are breaking out even as I type, as PP makes a major power play to wipe out independent abortion mills.

"This is huge, devastating for babies. Statistics bear out that the more abortion mills there are, the more abortions there are."

Meanwhile, Planned Parenthood continues to lose funding from corporations. Kohl's and Mrs. Fields are the two latest companies to stop their donations to Planned Parenthood, LifeNews.com reported Jan. 3. The announcement came from Life Decisions International (LDI), which tracks corporate giving to Planned Parenthood and publishes a boycott list of corporations that support the organization. The list may be ordered for a fee.

The announcement about the two companies follows the best six-month period in LDI's history.

"[M]ore corporations have been removed from the boycott list between the July 2010 and December 2010 lists than have ever been dropped in the past," LDI President Douglas Scott said, according to a Dec. 10 report by LifeNews.

Ten companies were dropped during the last six months, Scott said. They included Enterprise car rentals, Toys "R" Us, Forbes magazine and Rolex, LifeNews reported.

Normally two or three companies per six-month period announce they have withdrawn their support from Planned Parenthood, Scott said.

More than 270 corporations have halted donations to Planned Parenthood, according to LDI. The pro-life organization had its genesis in Scott's founding in 1989 of a project to inform corporate leaders of Planned Parenthood's abortion business. It incorporated as LDI in 1992.

The affiliates of Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed more than 324,000 abortions in 2008, the latest year for which statistics are available. Its 2008-09 report showed Planned Parenthood received $363.2 million in government grants and contracts during the year.

Contact:
Tom Strode
Source: Baptist Press
Publish Date: January 12, 2011

Planned Parenthood Backs Down, Withdraws Suit Against Operation Rescue for Requesting Public Records


     Planned Parenthood Backs Down, Withdraws Suit Against Operation Rescue for Requesting Public Records

Planned Parenthood has filed a motion to dismiss in a law suit against Operation Rescue's Cheryl Sullenger that was an attempt to block the Iowa Board of Medicine from releasing public information about four of their employees. The documents, comprised of medical license applications that are a matter of public record in all states, were released by the Iowa Board of Medicine to Sullenger last week, three months after her initial request. At least two of the "doctors" are involved in Planned Parenthood's webcam abortion pill distribution scheme, known as telemed abortions.

"While all the documents were heavily redacted - more so than we usually see with these kinds of records - we are grateful to our legal team, including Tom Brejcha of the Thomas More Society and Iowa attorney Mike Holzworth for working so hard to ensure that Planned Parenthood did not wrongfully conceal information that the public has a right to know. This is a victory for everyone because it helps keep the government accountable to the people."

In addition, Iowa attorney Patrick Smith represented the Citizen's Information Center and another requester, both from Massachusetts, which had made similar, independent requests. Both of those suits have been dismissed as well.

"Based on conversations with Kent Nebel of the Iowa Board of Medicine, I believe that he improperly tipped off Planned Parenthood to the requests in order to allow Planned Parenthood time to file the suits," said Sullenger. "Mr. Nebel told me personally that he was instructed by the Attorney General's office to inform Planned Parenthood of the public records requests. There is nothing we can see in Iowa law that would mandate such notification."

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller is currently under an ethics investigation for his part in blocking independent investigations into alleged criminal abortions conducted by Planned Parenthood of the Heartland through their webcam abortion scheme.

"It looks to us like Planned Parenthood still has a lot to hide. They were so afraid of the discovery phase in the law suits that they apparently decided it was better to allow the Iowa Board of Medicine to release the public information rather than allow us to ask them questions they did not want to answer," said Sullenger. "We are still very concerned about the cozy relationships that exist between the Iowa Attorney General's office, the Iowa Board of Medicine, and Planned Parenthood."

Attorneys for Operation Rescue are considering further legal action to ensure that politics are not being placed above the public welfare in Iowa.

Contact:
Troy Newman
Source: Operation Rescue
Publish Date: January 13, 2011

January 12, 2011

Blame Amendment 2: MO Government Can’t Be Forced to Fund Life Science Research



I won't rehash the Amendment 2 political fight in Missouri, but to recall that the proponents' language led to the state refusing to appropriate money for a life science trust fund because the money could be spent on ESCR or human cloning. Here's the history: A 2 created a state constitutional right to conduct human cloning research.  But the authors were greedy and didn't stop with that: They also prohibited the state from discriminating against one area of  research in public funding, if an associated area was funded.  That meant if the state funded, say adult stem cell research, it would also have to fund embryonic stem cell research.

Precisely because of this clause, subsequent to passage of Amendment 2, the legislature refused to fully fund a life science research trust fund–the very kind of restriction that opponents of Amendment 2 had warned would happen.  Indeed, I made that point repeatedly during the campaign, and later, here at SHS, when the funding was actually restricted.

The refusal to fund led to a lawsuit, as these things almost always do.  First, a trial court sided with the state.  Now a court of appeals has as well.  Here's the core of the actual ruling (citations omitted):

…while the provision specifying that money must be transferred into the Fund may appear mandatory and unqualified, the statutory provisions specifying the use or disbursement of monies from the Fund makes clear that such disbursements are subject to the legislature's appropriations power.  The statutory provision governing the use of monies contained in the Fund states that "[a]ll moneys that are appropriated by the general assembly from the life sciences research trust fund shall be appropriated to the life sciences research board" for specified purposes. § 196.1109 (emphasis added). Section 196.1109 goes on to specify the maximum percentage "of the moneys appropriated" that may be spent on construction of physical facilities, and the percentages that must be "appropriated" "to build research capacity," "to promote life science technology transfer and technology commercialization," and for "research of tobacco-related illnesses." Other references throughout §§ 196.1100-196.1130 make clear that the General Assembly plainly contemplated that no monies would actually be expended from the Fund without the intervention of the appropriations process…

The authors of Amendment 2 overreached by trying to both create a right to clone and a scheme to garner state money for doing so.  They are to blame for the funding restrictions that resulted, not the legislator opponents of cloning and ESCR, many of whom warned against this very outcome.

Contact: Wesley J. Smith
Source: Secondhand Smoke
Publish Date: January 12, 2011

Helping with abortions required by university



Nursing students told to look elsewhere if they can't participate

     Vanderbilt University's nursing residency program, where the school requires applicants to sign a pledge stating they'll participate in abortions

Agree to do abortions or you can't go to school here.

That's the message from Vanderbilt University's nursing residency program, where the school requires applicants to sign a pledge stating they'll participate in abortions.

The Christian legal group Alliance Defense Fun has filed a complaint with the federal Department of Health and Human Services in response stating the policy violates federal law.

The ADF reports that federal law states that any institution that receivesfederal grantscannot require students to do abortions in violation of their religious beliefs.

ADF spokesman Matt Bowman says it's clear the application misses the mark regarding the regulations.

"Vanderbilt is violating the law by requiring nursing residency applicants to promise to assist in abortions," Bowman explained.

"The fact that Vanderbilt receivesfederal fundingviolates the law by requiring their nursing candidates to assist in abortions," Bowman added.

Bowman says the Vanderbilt policy violates the law providing that any institution receiving federal grants cannot force, coerce or otherwise require an individual to assist in abortions.

"No entity which receives, after September 29, 1979, any grant, contract, loan,loan guarantee, or interest subsidy under the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], the Community Mental Health Centers Act [42 U.S.C. 2689 et seq.], or the Developmental Disabilities Assistance andBill of RightsAct of 2000 [42 U.S.C. 15001 et seq.] may deny admission or otherwise discriminate against any applicant (including applicants for internships and residencies) for training or study because of the applicant's reluctance, or willingness, to counsel, suggest, recommend, assist, or in any way participate in the performance of abortions or sterilizations contrary to or consistent with the applicant's religious beliefs or moral convictions," the law stated.

Vanderbilt nursing school spokeswoman Kathy Rivers says the program in question is the nursing residency program at VanderbiltUniversityMedical Center and not a program at the nursing school.

In a statement released to the media, VanderbiltUniversityMedical Center spokesman John Howser says the ADF is mistaken.

"Allegations by the Alliance Defense Fund that Vanderbilt's nursing students, or other employees of the Medical Center, are somehow required to participate in terminations of pregnancy or in other activities that may be contrary to the employee's religious beliefs or moral convictions appear to have arisen due to a misunderstanding by the Alliance Defense Fund," the statement said.

The statement adds that Vanderbilt's Medical Center has a religious freedom policy in place.

"A VanderbiltUniversityMedical Center policy has been in place for years for employees, including nurse residents, so they may be excused from participating in activities due to religious beliefs, ethical beliefs or other associated reasons," Howser's statement continued.

"This policy also applies to applicants to our nursing residency program who may be requested to participate in the care of women who seek medical care associated with the termination of pregnancy," Howser's statement added.

The Vanderbilt University Medical Center's hiring policy states that the center's plan complies with federal standards.

"In compliance with federal law, including the provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of theEducationAmendment of 1972, Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Executive Order 11246, the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, as amended, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008i, VanderbiltUniversitydoes not discriminate against individuals on the basis of their race, sex, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, disability, military service, or genetic information in its administration of educational policies, programs, or activities; admissions policies; scholarship and loan programs; athletic or otheruniversity-administered programs; or employment," the policy stated.

But Bowman said the nursing school's distinction is irrelevant and the law applies to the entire Vanderbilt system, schools and medical center. He adds that the statement from the Medical Center pointing to a non-discrimination policy is misleading.

"Vanderbilt is being duplicitous by talking about the wrong policy. Vanderbilt's application package specifically requires applicants to promise to assist in abortions and says nothing about another Vanderbilt policy which does not require them to assist in abortions," Bowman observed.

The language Bowman cites is found in the Women's Health Acknowledgment Letter that is one page 15 of the 16-page application and that the applicant must sign:

"Often women are faced with many difficult decisions about their lives and health care. Nurses in the Center for Women's Health support women through these decisions and provide professional evidence based care specific to each situation. One difficult decision women face is termination of pregnancy. If you are chosen for the Nurse Residency Program in the Women's Health track, you will be expected to care for women undergoing termination of pregnancy," the application letter reads.

The application letter adds that if the candidate cannot sign the letter, they should consider applying elsewhere.

"It is important that you are aware of this aspect of care and give careful consideration to your ability to provide compassionate care to women in these situations. If you feel you cannot provide care to women during this type of event, we encourage you to apply to a different track of the Nurse Residency Program to explore opportunities that may best fit your skills and career goals," the letter added.

The letter that must be signed by the candidate concludes with this acknowledgment.

"By signing this letter, I acknowledge that I am aware that I may be providing nursing care for women who are having the procedures listed above that may be performed in the Center for Women's Health," the letter concluded.

The discovery of Vanderbilt's policy makes the Nashville, Tenn., school just the latestuniversityto reveal admission or graduation policies that potentially require students to set aside religious beliefs in order to graduate.

WND reported that Augusta StateUniversityin Augusta, Ga., allegedly is forcing counseling student Jen Keeton to undergo a re-educationprogram because Keeton believes homosexuality is learned behavior.

Keeton's request for an injunction against the school forcing her to attend the re-educationprogram was denied.

Contact: Michael Carl
Source: WorldNetDaily
Publish Date: January 11, 2011