November 15, 2016

Pro-lifers win legal fight over controversial campaign

A controversial waste disposal company has dropped its legal fight against a pro-life group that waged a grassroots campaign against it.

Stericycle, which disposes of the bodies of aborted babies as "medical waste," was caught in Ohio and in Texas dumping the remains in a land fill.

Tom Brejcha of the Thomas More Society says Stericyle drew the attention of pro-life group Created Equal, which launched a public campaign against Stericyle and its CEO demanding that they stop working with abortion giant Planned Parenthood.

Click here for more from OneNewsNow.

November 14, 2016

A powerful pro-life, pro-adoption video: “This Time”

"The Time", pro-life video from John Elefante
Oh, my goodness, another incredibly powerful pro-life video this time from John Elefante, the former lead singer of the group “Kansas.” I learned about “This Time” from Charisma News which explains that the video shares the story of the birth of Sami, Elefante’s adopted daughter, whose 13-year-old mother came perilously close to aborting Sami.

“I can’t imagine life without my daughter, Sami, and it just breaks my heart that pregnant young women much like her birth mother, instead of choosing life for their babies, are denying them the chance to be born,” Elefante tells Abby Carr “If our song can in any way bring attention to this issue and encourage those who are considering abortion to choose life through options such as adoption, then we couldn’t be happier.”



So, why is “This Time” so effective?

For starters, Elefante does a marvelous job setting a real-life stage: a very frightened (barely) teenage girl who discovers she is pregnant. Scared out of her wits, she slams the bathroom door on her mother and races to the “solution”: the abortion clinic.

When a girl or woman is at the abortion clinic—let alone in the operating room itself—the pressure to “get this over with” is unfathomable. In this case, the young girl is half-asleep in the waiting room and dreams of being with the little girl she is carrying and about to abort.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Unborn Baby Proven to Be More Than a Clump of Cells on ‘Big Bang Theory’

Scene from "The Big Bang Theory" entitled “The Brain Bowl Incubation”
Scene from "The Big Bang Theory" entitled
“The Brain Bowl Incubation”
CBS’s Big Bang Theory has kept the pro-life message going with the storyline of Bernadette’s pregnancy this season. This time, they focus on the baby’s development including how it already “hears voices.”

On Thursday’s episode “The Brain Bowl Incubation,” Sheldon (Jim Parsons) and Amy (Mayim Bialik) decide to combine their skin cells to form brain cells in a petri dish at the lab. Proud of their creation, Sheldon feels like a dad, going so far as to comparing their science experiment to Bernadette’s (Melissa Rauch) baby, much to her disapproval.



Big Bang has brought up Bernadette’s baby time and time again in a positive, pro-life way. Glad to see they value the “life”– not the “choice” – growing inside her. Keep up the good work, CBS!

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

UPDATE: HB 4013 - State Insurance Public Aid Abortions

Vote NO on HB4013
HB4013 - State Insurance Public Aid Abortions

House Sponsors:
Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, Carol Sente, Ann M. Williams, Elizabeth Hernandez, Barbara Flynn Currie, Gregory Harris and Emanuel Chris Welch

Status: 
This bill is Re-referred to Rules Committee

Additional information:
The language for this bill has also been added to SB1465 as an amendment (House Amendment 1).  This bill is in the Appropriations-Human Services Committee.  It was not called for a vote during this last session, however it is unknown if this bill will be heard in the committee during the next session.

Summary:
This bill removes the portion of the State Employees Group Insurance Act that prohibits including the expenses of obtaining an abortion, induced miscarriage or induced premature birth.  This means that the State's medical assistance program will no longer exclude coverage for abortions.  It also now includes abortions, or induced miscarriages or premature births on the list of services provided.  In addition, this bill will no longer prohibit the Department of Human Services from making grants to nonprofit agencies and organizations that use such grants to refer or counsel for, or perform, abortions.  So tax payer money could be used to cover abortions and fund grants to organizations who perform abortions.  This bill removes all restrictions on tax payer funding of abortions.

Action:
Contact your Illinois State Representative and urge them to vote NO on HB4013.

You can find your Representative's contact information by clicking here.

Click here for more information on this bill.

November 11, 2016

No one's talking about the trauma of abortion by pill

While the number of abortions in the United States has declined, a recent report shows that women seeking abortions are increasingly preferring medical abortions, rather than surgical ones.

According to data from Planned Parenthood, in a report from Reuters, medical abortions – those by pill – made up 43 percent of all abortions in the U.S. in 2014, up from 35 percent in 2010.

In some places, the demand for the abortion pill tripled after March, when the FDA expanded the use of the abortion pill (mifepristone or RU486 misoprostol used together with misoprostol) to include pregnancies up to 10 weeks. Previously, only women who were up to seven weeks pregnant were able to take the pill, due to concerns about side effects.

Click here for more from CNA/EWTN News.

Euthanasia could get a major shot in the arm

At issue is a proposal for the national doctor group to move to a neutral position on Euthanasia – often called physician-assisted suicide or “mercy killing.” This neutral position is what pro-death forces are striving for, believing that it will open the door for physicians to help kill their patients.

Association of Pro-Life Physicians President Dr. Patrick Johnston told OneNewsNow, “The issue here is not what the Left – the pro-death forces – are making it out to be,” Johnston argues. “I want people to be comfortable – and at the end of life, as well. The issue is prescribing a poison to intentionally kill patients versus providing compassionate, loving health care compatible with the Golden Rule.

The Hippocratic Oath, on the other hand, calls physicians to do no harm. Johnston points out that in pre-Hippocrates Greece, patients were more concerned that doctors were being paid to kill them than they were paying them to keep them alive.

Click here for more from OneNewsNow

Illinois GOP congressman who campaigned on pro-abortion ticket loses re-election

Illinois Republican Congressman Bob Dold
Illinois Republican Congressman Bob Dold
Among Tuesday’s numerous GOP House and Senate victories were some losses for so-called “moderate” Republicans running in blue states.

Illinois Congressman Bob Dold ran as a pro-abortion Republican and lost by almost 14,000 votes (52 percent to 48 percent) to Democrat Brad Schneider, who took back the 10th District seat he lost to Dold in 2014.

Click here for more from LifeSiteNews.com

Pro-abort Republicans a ‘thing of the past’: SBA List president

Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List
Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the
Susan B. Anthony List
The 2016 elections made it "very clear" that pro-abortion Republicans are "a thing of the past," a pro-life political leader said at a press conference Wednesday afternoon.

"One thing that is very clear in [the] Republican party is that there will be no more Mark Kirks," said Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List. "That type of pro-choice, pro-abortion leadership is a thing of the past."

"And unfortunately, Mark Kirk didn't learn it soon enough..."

Click here for more from LifeSiteNews.com

Trump’s transition website promises he’ll ‘protect innocent human life from conception’

President-elect Donald Trump's administration will "protect innocent human life from conception to natural death" and "protect individual conscience in healthcare," according to its transition team's new website.

GreatAgain.gov, the transition team's official website, has a healthcare section that says the Trump administration will repeal Obamacare and "protect innocent human life from conception to natural death, including the most defenseless and those Americans with disabilities."

Protecting conscience in healthcare is first on a list of actions the administration says it will take.

Click here for more from LifeSiteNews.com

November 9, 2016

Post Election Results


The IFRL has posted the Post Election Results for 2016 General Election for each endorsed candidate.

Use the links below to view the offices, endorsed candidates and results of the elections.

All in all, the pro-life movement did have a good election, many pro-life candidates were elected or re-elected for their offices.






GOP keeps pro-life majorities in U.S. Senate and House

The Republican Party has maintained control of the U.S. Senate and House, holding on to majority advantage over the Democrats. The GOP’s Senate hold is a major victory for pro-life and pro-family advocates and has stunned many political pundits who predicted a Democratic takeover.

With the victory by Donald Trump—unimaginable to most political observers right up through Election Day—the Republican Party on January 20, 2017 will control the executive and legislative branches of power in Washington.

Click here for more from LifeSiteNews.com

Congratulation to Pro-Life President-elect Donald Trump

National Right to Life Committee, the federation of 50 state right-to-life affiliates and more than 3,000 local chapters, congratulates pro-life President-elect Donald Trump on his win against pro-abortion candidate Hillary Clinton. We also congratulate the Trump campaign team, led by Kellyanne Conway, on running a brilliant campaign against a candidate who had unprecedented financial resources and the backing of the mainstream media.

“Clinton and the Democratic Party have taken the most extreme abortion position possible, including support for late abortions when the baby can feel pain and seeking to change the law so that taxpayer dollars would be used to fund abortion on demand,” said Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life. “Donald Trump took a strong, principled pro-life position, heard by millions of Americans in the third debate. He never backed down on his opposition to abortion and he won.”

National Right to Life also congratulates pro-life Republican senators...

Congratulations also to pro-life House members who prevailed and kept the U.S. House under pro-life leadership.

“Pro-life voters showed that protecting unborn children is not only the right position, but the best winning political position,” said Tobias. “National Right to Life looks forward to working with President-elect Trump and the newly elected pro-life Congress on policy initiatives to protect the lives of unborn children.”

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

November 7, 2016

VOTE PRO-LIFE







Appreciating the enormity of what is at stake Tuesday

Carol Tobias, President National Right to Life
Carol Tobias, President
National Right to Life
By Carol Tobias, President National Right to Life

Election Day is upon us. In just days we will know who is our 45th President and whether the U.S. Senate remains under pro-life leadership.

Have you, like me, waited for this day for four years?

For those who care passionately about protecting unborn children, Election Day 2012 was an extremely difficult day. We knew that the re-election of President Obama would delay the day when unborn children would be protected from abortion.

Hillary Clinton is running as if for Obama’s third term–a continuation of his anti-life policies, included. Like you, I truly hope and pray that the American people say, “No!”

In the most straightforward terms, what is our goal? To protect unborn children, the vulnerable elderly, and those with disabilities. Part and parcel of this is restoring the basic principle that every human life–not just the “planned and the perfect”–has intrinsic value and infinite dignity.

A great way to foster that respect for human life is to elect men and women who understand that a society that kills its weakest, its most vulnerable, is not a city shining on a hill, but a culture that resembles the proverbial circular firing squad.

What can an election do? Allow me to review what is at stake.

Judicial appointments

We understand the importance of the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, instead of being an arbiter, and a check against constitutional infringements by Congress and the Executive Branch, we sometimes see that Court act as if it were a legislative body, setting national law, as seven unelected justices did in Roe v. Wade. We need a president who will nominate justices who understand the proper role of the High Court.

There is grave danger, however, that we will instead see the emergence of a Court majority that will insist that the U.S. Constitution prohibits elected state and federal lawmakers from limiting abortion – including late abortion – in any meaningful way at all. The result would be the step-by-step invalidation even of pro-life laws upheld in the past – both federal laws such as the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act and the Hyde Amendment, and hundreds of state laws. It could also become difficult if not impossible for pro-life individuals to serve as doctors and nurses, because the “conscience” laws that currently protect their right to avoid involvement in abortion could be invalidated.

Aside from the U.S. Supreme Court, the president also appoints judges to the powerful federal courts of appeals, and hundreds of federal district judges – all of these being lifetime appointments. These federal judges often decide which laws stand and which will be nullified (since the Supreme Court accepts only a very limited number of cases for review).

Pregnancy Resource Centers

As you have read, Pregnancy Resource Centers (PRC) are under ferocious attack at the state level. But they can and most likely will be affected by the actions of the next president.

The abortion industry does not like PRCs–and understandably so. For every woman they help and every baby they save, that is money the abortion industry did not get. There is an ongoing effort to infringe on the free speech of these centers, forcing them to tell clients who come through the door which services (i.e., abortion) are NOT offered at the facility. The state of California goes so far as to require that PRCs inform women where they can get an abortion and that the state may pay for it.

Many of the laws or city ordinances that tried to limit the PRCs have been struck down but federal courts have, so far, allowed the extreme California law to remain in force. Will federal judges appointed in the future protect the right of PRCs to offer only the services they desire? Or will the PRCs become unwilling tools for a local or state government as influenced (controlled?) by the abortion industry. That can be impacted by the next occupant in the White House.

Administrative positions

In addition to federal judges, the president also makes hundreds of key appointments to Executive Branch positions that can greatly diminish or increase the threat to the lives of innocent, vulnerable, human life. Some of these appointments are high-level and very public, such as secretary of state, secretary of health and human services, and attorney general.

Many are mid-level positions, filled by people whose names are not often in the news and are not well known by the people. However, these may be the federal employees who take a law passed by Congress and draft the rules to implement it for the rest of us to follow. This may be a person who works on how to further implement Obamacare or who works to dismantle and replace Obamacare after it has been repealed.

This may be the person who decides if Planned Parenthood can apply directly to the federal government for reimbursement if a state has decided not to fund PP.

International policy

The next president will appoint a team to work with the U.N. and other countries in determining international laws and treaties. Will the U.S. continue, as it has for the past eight years, to further the campaign to recognize abortion as an international “right”?

Congress

Of course, in addition to president, we are electing members of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. These bodies can pass or defeat legislation that will affect innocent human life. Will our next Congress be able to pass legislation like the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, or will they be voting to eliminate the Hyde Amendment, as Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party platform have called for.

The above list is only scratching the surface of what is at stake in this election. The importance of elected officials, their appointments, and their staff can have broader, more wide-reaching, consequences than most of us can imagine.

During testimony before a congressional committee, Hillary Clinton once famously asked, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” To the millions of innocent unborn children and those lives vulnerable to Obamacare and assisted suicide, the November 8 elections matter immensely.

Vote wisely and encourage like-minded family and friends to do the same. Innocent human lives are depending on you.

November 3, 2016

Is your vote in accordance with what you say you believe?

Be their voice, Vote Pro-Life
As an old-fashioned patriotic type, I believe we are obliged to take responsibility for shaping our democracy. But, at the same time, I know that others are convinced there are other “better” uses of their time, especially if they are not inspired by the candidates. I speak to them all the time.

However there is an altogether different moral calculus for pro-lifers. Babies die by the thousands each and every day. Can we honestly say we don’t have 20 minutes to do what we can to level the legislative field for those who have no voice but ours?

In our capacity as single-issue pro-life voters, do we properly recognize the clear implication of our own view?

Always?

Probably we do, in the sense that in our ethical calculations we prioritize saving unborn babies from abortion and the medically dependent from assisted suicide and euthanasia. But as voters, do we always, always, always go to the polls?

Do you know which candidates are pro-life?  Click here for the IFRL PAC Endorsements.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

November 2, 2016

Americans don’t want to foot bill for killing babies

Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton
Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton
Politico-Harvard poll clearly indicates that Hillary Clinton supporters believe Medicaid should be reimbursing Planned Parenthood for abortions - but National Right to Life Committee president Carol Tobias tells OneNewsNow it also shows that a majority of Americans are opposed to it.

“Americans do not want their tax dollars to pay to kill unborn babies,” she says. “That hasn't changed in the 40 years that the Hyde Amendment has been law, and yet we know that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party platform are calling for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment so that tax dollars can be used to pay for abortion.”

“They [Planned Parenthood] are not a full-service medical facility or an organization,” she explains. “We have a lot of community health centers in this country that do provide full-service medical care for women, but they're not getting as much money as they could or should because it's going to Planned Parenthood.”

Click here for more from OneNewsNow.

Corrupt Clinton Foundation's Partnership with Planned Parenthood Promotes Abortion Around the Globe

Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation
Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation
Recent headlines discussing an open FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation have referred to it as a "money laundering scheme" where influence within the American government can be purchased - for a hefty price.

But there is also a lesser discussed aspect of the Clinton Foundation - one that is literally costing innocent lives. This Clinton Foundation program works to promote and expand abortion in third world countries in formal partnership with abortion supplier Planned Parenthood.

"While the Clinton Foundation doesn't seem to actually do much but enrich the Clinton family, it does do one thing, and that is abortion," said Troy Newman, President of Operation Rescue.

On the Clinton Foundation payroll is at least one Planned Parenthood abortionist. Nicola Moore calls herself a "fly-in abortionista." Based in Massachusetts, this traveling abortionist has spent stints working at Planned Parenthood abortion facilities across the country, wearing a mask in the likeness of one of the Three Stooges to conceal her identity.

Click here for more from Christian Newswire.

November 1, 2016

VIDEO: Donald Trump explains to EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo his journey to becoming Pro-Life

Raymond Arroyo interview on EWTN with Donald Trump
Raymond Arroyo interview on EWTN with Donald Trump
You can watch the exclusive interview Donald Trump gave to Eternal World Television Network (EWTN) host Raymond Arroyo here.

You can also read the full transcript at the National Catholic Register.

Here are a few highlights of a genuinely fascinating interview which aired on the Oct. 27 episode of EWTN’s “The World Over.” For single-issue pro-lifers, the first query that Trump responded to was to reiterate that he would nominate pro-life justices to the Supreme Court.

For newcomers, or those who haven’t heard Trump talk about his pro-life conversion, Trump tells Arroyo that there wasn’t a moment that changed his thinking and his heart on abortion.

Well, there are a number of moments, but one was a couple that I know very, very well — and you had a strong pro-life [person] and you had a strong pro-choice [person], and they argued over [the pregnancy]. … The mother was pregnant. They argued over the child. One, I won’t get into specifics. …But one wanted to abort. And the other said, “We can’t do that. We’re not going to do that.” Anyway, they had the baby. It was a long time ago. And the baby is such a magnificent person, who I know, a magnificent person. And the person that was actually pro-choice is now pro-life because of it, and it had a big effect on me. But I’ve seen other examples similar to that; but I’ve seen other examples, so …

Arroyo interjects, “So, it was a personal change for you?” and Trump responds

It is a personal change. And, you know, Ronald Reagan made that personal change, too. Many people have made the personal change. I mean, some make the personal change the other way, also. … But I made the personal change, and I’m very happy with it.



Click here for more from National Right to Life.

Fight for Free Speech, Conscience Rights Continues in California, Illinois

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represents pro-life organizations and individuals targeted by new laws in California and Illinois, filed legal challenges in both states late last week in an ongoing battle to keep the states from forcing the organizations to promote or refer for abortions.

In Illinois, ADF filed a motion for a preliminary injunction Thursday against a change in the state’s Health Care Right of Conscience Act designed to force all medical professionals, along with as many as 130 local pregnancy help centers and medical clinics, to refer their clients to nearby abortion clinics upon request of the patient.

Challenging the Illinois legislation—which was set forth as Senate Bill 1564 and signed into law July 29 by Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner—ADF appealed to state and federal Constitutional free speech protection, as well as Illinois’ Religious Freedom Restoration Act on behalf of two pregnancy help centers and a pro-life ob-gyn who would also be affected by the legislation if it were to go into effect Jan. 1, 2017.

Click here for more from National Right to Life.

October 31, 2016

Facebook reverses course after first offering absurd reason to reject CPC ad

Birthright of Bel Air Facebook Ad
Birthright of Bel Air Facebook Ad
Ok, I grant you there is no necessary linkage. But…

(1) Facebook’s cofounder has pledged to give $20 million “to political groups that support Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton,” according to the Washington Post.

(2) That, as of May, “Facebook employees as individuals have donated more than $114,000 to Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton this election cycle, by far the most of any presidential candidate,” the Hill newspaper reported.

(3) Facebook turned down an ad from a Crisis Pregnancy Center for reasons that no one over the age of 6 would believe are genuine.

From WBFF, Fox News 45 Baltimore: Seems Birthright of Bel Air, a Harford County pregnancy aid center, wanted to do what many organizations routinely do : pay Facebook so its advertisement would reach a wider online audience.

But the word– the word which was delivered within 5 minutes of the request’s submission–was no.

So why did Facebook change its tune? Atha’s friends share the new ad on their personal pages–maybe that had an influence, she suggested. ( Or perhaps Facebook got wind a story might be coming out about its absurd decision.)

Click here for more from National Right to Life.