June 14, 2013

Pro-abortion Pelosi asked 'simple' question about the unborn: 'What's the difference?'

 
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was visibly unhappy at a press conference Thursday when she was asked to explain how abortions performed at approximately five months differ from the grisly murders committed by Pennsylvania abortionist Kermit Gosnell.
 
At the press conference, Pelosi had commented on a Republican bill that would ban abortions at 20 weeks when she called on John McCormack, a reporter for conservative magazine The Weekly Standard.
 
"What is the moral difference between what Dr. Gosnell did to a baby born alive at 23 weeks and aborting her moments before birth?" McCormack asked the congresswoman. 
 
"You're probably enjoying that question a lot," Pelosi replied. "I can see you savoring it."
 
The congresswoman, who is infamously pro-abortion, then preached at the reporter that she is a mother of five children, then she brought religion into the topic.
 
"As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this," Pelosi said. "I don't think it should have anything to do with politics and that's where you're taking it, and I'm not going there."
 
What did Pelosi mean by "sacred ground?"
 
Marjorie Dannenfelser of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List feels Pelosi was saying abortion is sacred and that is what she is protecting as a Catholic.
 
"I'm actually myself a practicing Catholic and I guess I would say that the church has taught for a very long time that life is sacred," says Dannenfelser. "And she's out there trying to protect that abortion ground, and really is more happy to protect the institution of abortion than she is the individuals who are suffering from it."
The exchange was picked up by the Drudge Report and other online media outlets. On National Review Online, Ramesh Ponnuru wrote that Pelosi claimed the bill would ban abortion, which he pointed out is untrue.
 
"McCormack, note, did not bring religion into the question," Ponnuru wrote. "He asked her to justify her position on a question of public policy. She chose not to try."
 
In the press conference, Pelosi moved on to another question. But the reporter still got in the last word: "It was a simple question," McCormack told her. "You didn't answer."
 
Contact: Charlie Butts, Source: OneNewsNow.com

Government Approves Plan B for Children

 
The Justice Department (DOJ) decided Monday to comply with a judge's ruling that allows anyone to buy a drug that may cause early abortions. The ruling says no one needs a prescription and minors do not require parental notification or consent to purchase the drug.
 
The drug, marketed as Plan B and also referred to as the "morning after pill," contains high levels of hormones, which have not been tested on pre-teens and teenage girls. The Obama administration previously argued that age limits were "common sense" for those wanting to buy Plan B without prescriptions. Plan B activist groups claim, however, that unrestricted access to the drug is a form of "reproductive justice."
 
"The DOJ's decision comes at the same time a bill is pending in the U.S. Senate to prohibit the sale of some cough syrups to minors due to fear of abuse," said Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director of issue analysis for CitizenLink. "So, teenage girls can be trusted with a powerful hormone drug available over the counter without medical supervision but not with cough syrup. This is yet another example of the politics of abortion above common sense." 
 
A district judge in April ordered the Obama Administration to drop its age requirement for buying Plan B. The Obama administration announced its appeal of the order in May, then reversed course.
 
"President Obama has yet again sided with Planned Parenthood, his favorite political ally and the single largest distributor of Plan B drugs — drugs that can destroy a life," said Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) Litigation Counsel Catherine Glenn Foster. "Whatever guides this administration in its decisions, it is apparently not the health and well-being of our daughters and granddaughters. The administration's decision is nothing short of shameful."
 
In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved over-the-counter access to Plan B for women 18 and older, according to court documents. Those under 18 were required to have a prescription. The FDA was later ordered to make it available without a prescription to 17-year-olds.
 
"It is irresponsible to advocate over-the-counter use of these high-potency drugs, which would make them available to anyone — including those predators who exploit young girls," said Janice Shaw Crouse, director and senior fellow of Concerned Women for America's Beverly LaHaye Institute. "Mark my words, it will not be long before we see girls and women forced to purchase Plan B for their abuser to keep them and others enslaved. This is a pimp, predator and pedophile's dream — unlimited access to Plan B."
 
FOR MORE INFORMATION
 
 
Contact: Bethany Monk, Source CitizenLink

Planned Parenthood Attacks Pro-Life Event - Hits National Media

 
Project Wildfire's initial pro-life event garnered national media coverage (see links below) showing America how vicious Planned Parenthood is to those whose choice is not to agree. It got significant national attention and trended #1 on twitter for 14 hours. According to twitter over "30,000 people used the hash-tag #ExposePP (our event tag) that day," due in a large part to the attack by PP and its army of supporters. Their coordinated effort to "HIJACK" "#ExposePP" may have backfired, as many pro-choice people were appalled at the viciousness of the attack:
 
"C'mon people. What are you doing? I am pro-choice and you are embarrassing me with these insults and personal attacks. Maybe I'm on the wrong side!" -- Carol Spencer
 
 
 
The groups next event "PROJECT WILDFIRE - #ExposePP" is scheduled for Sunday June 16. This is an online event similar to the #Gosnell tweet-fest, which resulted in the media covering the Kermit Gosnell trial. It will be from 8am - 8pm
 
 
A month ago this pro-life event started and was named: PROJECT WILDFIRE with the Twitter "Hash-Tag" -- #exposePP, with the intent to discuss FACTS unfavorable to PP. As reported by philanthropy.com, Planned Parenthood "employs an outside firm to monitor every tweet, and then targets people who disagree."
 
On May 31 they quickly swooped in on the June 1 Facebook event at 11pm Friday night. The event page was bombarded with filthy language and porn pictures. These pro-abortion zealots, sent by Planned Parenthood, announced their intent to "Hijack" #Expose PP, and by 1am it was the #1 thing trending on twitter.
 
Many pro-life people, including those with Project Wildfire, began to respond and started the event 8 hours early. For the entire day, #ExposePP remained in the top 5 trends on twitter, with PP fans bragging about the "hijacking" and pro-life people calmly speaking FACTS. This twitter war started because PP is so determined to silence anyone who dares to stand in opposition to their pro-choice agenda.
 
Considering this was the NUMBER ONE trend on twitter Saturday and with the Gosnell issue in the public eye, this event seems clearly worthy of coverage.
 
Conatct: Cary Bogue, Source: Project Wildfire

Woman Sues Over Forced, Botched Abortion

 
Caution: Graphic subject matter.
 
A woman filed suit Friday against a West Virginia abortionist claiming he forced her to proceed and then left part of her preborn baby inside her womb, according to court documents.
 
Itai Gravely, 26, went to the Women's Health Center (WHC) of West Virginia in April. She was told she was 11 weeks pregnant and was persuaded to proceed with an abortion. According to court documents, she was  given both an oral sedative and intravenous sedation before abortionist Rodney Lee Stephens began.
 
During the abortion, Gravely complained of severe pain, court documents state. She immediately and repeatedly told Stephens and those who were assisting him to stop. They did not, according to the legal complaint, and physically restrained Gravely.
 
"A woman's life is more important than an abortionist's bottom line," said Jeremy Dys, an ADF attorney representing the Gravely. "What Stephens and Women's Health Center did to Itai is beyond the pale. She has been exposed to extraordinary cruelty, and her life was put in jeopardy."
 
Gravely went home shortly after the abortion, and was still in immense pain. The next day, she was transported to Charleston Area Medical Center—Women's and Children's Hospital (CAMC). Physicians conducted an ultrasound and found parts of the preborn baby—including his or her skull — had been left in Gravely's uterus. They were able to remove it and other remaining parts.
 
Dr. Byron Calhoun, the medical expert who examined Gravely's complaint and medical records, said Stephens and the WHC were negligent. They violated standards of care "by failing to account for the fetal skull following Ms. Gravely's surgical abortion… (F)etal parts…, if retained, could lead to serious injury or even death."
 
Meanwhile, the country's largest abortion seller continues to put women and children in danger.
 
Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday challenging an Alabama law designed to raise the standard of care at abortion centers in the state.  The law requires abortionists  to have staff privileges at a local hospital. The law is set to take effect next month.
 
"Abortionists should be held to the same health and safety standards as all other medical facilities," said ADF Senior Counsel Casey Maddox. "It's not too much to expect that abortionists meet basic standards to protect women's health."
 
In addition, an appeals court heard arguments also on Tuesday in a case involving a Planned Parenthood lawsuit fighting an Arizona bill prohibiting the use of taxpayer funds for abortion.
 
The American people should not have to support this, said ADF Senior Counsel Michael J. Norton.
 
"Our tax dollars should not fund abortionists who are irresponsible and only promote their own self-interest and bottom line."
 
Support Pro-Life Resolution in U.S. Senate
 
On May 6, 2013, Sen. Mike Lee (Utah) introduced a resolution calling on Congress and state governments to investigate abortion industry practices that allow illegal activities as well as dangerous and unsanitary conditions. Lee wants Congress to hold hearings on topics including the number of post-viability abortions in the U.S. and how many babies are born alive.
 
Please contact your two U.S. Senators and ask them to support the Lee resolution and Congressional hearings into the abortion industry.
 
FOR MORE INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Source: CitizenLink

Susan G. Komen cancels 2014 Chicago "Race for the Cure"

 
CHICAGO - There will be no 2014 Susan G. Komen Walk in Chicago to raise funds for fighting breast cancer.
 
The group, which dealt with weeks of negative publicity last year over its affiliation and contributions to Planned Parenthood, is canceling half of its three-day walks in major cities throughout the country, reportedly due to lack of participation. To date, the walks were the group's largest fundraiser.
 
Though the foundation initially attempted to defund Planned Parenthood last year, it caved to pro-abortion advocates' pressure and renewed its grants to the abortion provider. Komen refuses to acknowledge numerous studies that tie breast cancer to abortion.
 
Chicago's 2013 Race for the Cure was held May 12, honoring the late Chicago First Lady Maggie C. Daley, a victim of breast cancer. Another Chicago area Race for the Cure is scheduled for September 2013 and will be held at Lombard's Yorktown Mall.
 
Komen says they are dropping next year's walks in Washington DC, San Francisco, Arizona, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland and Tampa Bay. Walks will continue in Komen's homebase of Dallas-Ft. Worth, as well as Atlanta, Michigan, Philadelphia, San Diego, Seattle and Minneapolis-St. Paul.
 
Source: Illinois Review

June 7, 2013

Marathon runner’s shock: she’s pregnant and in labor with miracle baby

 
Contact: Johanna Dasteel, Source: LifeSiteNews.com
 
A 33-year-old Minnesota marathon runner found herself racing to the delivery room rather than the finish line on Monday. Crippled with back pain after a 10-mile training run on Sunday, Trish Staine thought she had suffered an injury. Doctors found, however, that she was in labor.
 
 
That came as a shock to her. She didn't know she was pregnant.
 
After spending more than 24 hours suffering debilitating back pain, all the while going about regular activities such as attending her son's basketball game and her daughter's short play, Staine finally decided she needed to go to the hospital.
 
"I felt like I was dying. I didn't know what was going on," she said.
 
Staine's husband, John, was not at home with Trish when she decided she needed to see a doctor, so he called for an ambulance that took her to the emergency room. Upon examination, the doctors stunned the couple with news of a fetal heartbeat.
 
"I said, `No, no, that's impossible,'" said Staine.
 
During Staine's nearly eight-month pregnancy, she didn't gain weight and never felt her baby move.
 
In fact, her husband observed that it seemed she was losing weight during her marathon training, with her face visibly thinning out.
 
Even more bewildering was the fact that her husband had previously undergone a vasectomy for sterilization.
 
"He's still in shock," Staine said of her husband, John. "Everybody is teasing him."
 
According to WebMD.com, 1 in 100 vasectomies fail within five years, allowing pregnancy.
 
Within what seemed, to Staine, only a matter of minutes after finding out she was pregnant, she was face to face with her daughter.
 
At 3:25 pm on Monday, she had given birth to a 6 pound, 6 ounce, 18.9 inch-long baby girl.
 
The couple named her Mira, short for Miracle.
 
Mira was born five weeks premature,and will remain under observation at the hospital.
 
Doctors predict she will be home with her family some time next week.
 
Trish and John have five other children, ranging 7 to 20 in age. Trish is stepmother to John's three oldest children.
 
The couple also have two additional foster children and run a transitional foster-care program for young men called the Genesis Project.
 
Trish still plans on running in Grandma's Marathon, the half-marathon she had been training for when her labor began on Sunday. It takes place on June 22nd.
 
This time, her newborn baby girl will be waiting to see her after she crosses the finish line.

Cardinal Dolan: Cuomo’s bill could open door to forced abortions

 
Contact: Ben Johnson, Source: LifeSiteNews.com
 
New York's Catholic leadership and Senate Republicans have resolved that the abortion expansion measures proposed by Governor Andrew Cuomo this week will not pass.
 
Cardinal Timothy Dolan has stepped up opposition to the bill, which he says will go far beyond "codifying" the provisions of Roe v. Wade, as Gov. Cuomo has said it would do, to a radical expansion of abortion in the Empire State.
 
On Tuesday, Cardinal Dolan stated: "This legislation would add a broad and undefined 'health' exception for late-term abortion and would repeal the portion of the penal law that governs abortion policy, opening the door for non-doctors to perform abortions and potentially decriminalizing even forced or coerced abortions."
 
Earlier today, he reiterated that the New York State Catholic Conference supports nine of the 10 provisions of Cuomo's "Women's Equality Act," which focus on things like stemming human trafficking and domestic violence.
 
"Sadly, the tenth is, literally, 'a killer,' as it increases access to abortion," he said. "In a state where 40% of babies are aborted – and, in some areas, 60% of babies of Latino or African American blood – we hardly need to further the abortion license."
 
"Can't we work together to help pregnant women in trouble with more lifegiving alternatives?" he asked.
 
Cardinal Dolan's remarks on the bill today were coupled with a statement supporting a national proposal granting amnesty to 11 million illegal immigrants.
 
His opposition to the abortion expansion bill was the second issue mentioned.
 
He had previously called the Women's Equality Act's conscience clause "vague and insufficient."
 
New York Senate Republicans agree the abortion expansion is unwise and unnecessary.
 
Scott Reif, a spokesman for GOP State Senate Minority Leader Dean Skelos, has said the Republicans "will not consent to bringing that measure to the floor." Republicans, too, support the rest of the bill's nine measures.
 
But Governor Cuomo retorted that the pro-abortion and feminist groups involved in drafting his legislation will not allow the bill to be broken into separate parts.
 
"The coalition has been united in wanting all 10 to pass," he said.
 
In his announcement on Tuesday, Cuomo said of the legislation, "I see it almost as a bill of rights."

Super Bowl champ Matt Birk skips meeting with Obama over ‘God bless Planned Parenthood’ remark

 
Contact:  John Jalsevac, Source: LifeSiteNews.com
 
For many athletes the chance to meet the president of the United States of America is a once-in-a-lifetime, never-to-be-missed opportunity. But not for Ravens Super Bowl champ Matt Birk.
 
Birk, who earned his Super Bowl ring earlier this year as a center with the Baltimore Ravens, told KFAN-FM this morning that he decided to skip a meet-and-greet with President Obama over the president's support for Planned Parenthood.
 
"About five or six weeks ago, our president made a comment in a speech and he said, 'God bless Planned Parenthood,'" Birk told the radio station. "Planned Parenthood performs about 330,000 abortions a year. I am Catholic, I am active in the pro-life movement, and I just felt like I couldn't deal with that."
 
The football star said that while he has "great respect for the office of the president," he "couldn't endorse" the president's support for the country's top abortion organization "in any way."
 
"I'm very confused by [the president's] statement," said Birk. "For God to bless a place where they're ending 330,000 lives a year? I just chose not to attend."
 
Obama made the "God bless Planned Parenthood remark" at the conclusion of his speech to a Planned Parenthood conference in April. The speech put Obama in the books as the first sitting president to address the abortion organization.
 
Most of the rest of Birk's teammates met with the president at the White House yesterday.
 
This is not the first time that Birk has been outspoken on social issues, standing up for traditional values.
 
In a previous interview he described holding his daughter for the first time. "It was unbelievable the love that I felt for her," he said, "and any parent knows exactly what I'm talking about. At that point, you know it's not a choice. Life is a gift that's given to us. We are supposed to accept it. It's not our choice whether we decide a baby lives or not."
 
He told Catholic Review that participating in the March for Life in Washington is "one of the coolest things I've done."
 
"It seems like our society and media want to push pro-lifers to the side and hope that we would shut our mouths and go away quietly," he added. "Let's not do that."
 
Last October Matt Birk made headlines when he weighed in on the gay marriage debate, defending traditional marriage.
 
"My hope is that, by adding my voice to this discussion, I encourage the majority of Americans who do agree that it's not the state's place to redefine marriage to speak up with truth and respect," he said at the time. "Bonding one man and one woman together through marriage helps connect both moms and dads to their kids; that's why the state cares about marriage in the first place. Society should always be looking for ways to strengthen marriage, rather than redefine it."
 
He also addressed his pro-life views in an interview with The National Catholic Register, saying:
 
You may not be able to save thousands of lives on your own, but the one life you can save today does mean a lot.
 
Whether it's teaching our own children to be pro-life, contacting our elected representatives or working at crisis-pregnancy centers, we can all do something. These examples are in addition to prayer, which everyone can do and which everyone should do. Prayer is the basis of any good action. Each little effort helps to bring about a culture of life, a culture in which children are appreciated rather than disposed of.
 
I spoke at a pro-life rally in Maryland a couple years ago, and it was a life-changing experience. I heard other speakers, including women who deeply regretted their own abortions. Their work, carried out through the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, was very persuasive. It wasn't just a theoretical discussion; it was real women who had experienced the trauma of losing a child through abortion. They wanted to prevent other women from going through that same thing.
 
If people were told the truth about abortion, no one would ever seek out the procedure. We hear about "choice" and "reproductive rights," but no one is ever told by an abortionist, "I will kill your baby by ripping off its arms and legs." The women from Silent No More let people know the facts so that better decisions will be made. It's very admirable work.

Gosnell prosecutors display ‘house of horrors’ equipment to public

 
Contact: Ben Johnson, Source: National Right to Life News Today
 
Editor's note. This appeared at lifesitenews.com.
 
For weeks, jurors gazed on the filthy furniture and medical items retrieved from Kermit Gosnell's "house of horrors." Now, prosecutors have displayed the equipment to the public.
 
After the judge denied prosecutor Joanne Pescatore's request to take the jury to the infamous facility located at 3801 Lancaster Avenue, she and assistant prosecutor Ed Cameron brought a number of the items into the courtroom.
 
The miniature suite included an operating table, a tattered recliner, a garbage disposal, and various emergency tubes.
 
In a sense, they became the prosecution's star witness inside Courtroom 302 of the Criminal Justice Center. The 2011 grand jury report painted a picture of horror beyond words, but the medical items brought their words into undeniable reality.
 
Much of the equipment – aged, dilapidated, and caked with dirt – was discolored and ill-kept. An emergency tracheotomy kit, usually clear or off-white, was stained brown. Some of the equipment would shock women during ultrasounds.
 
Patients were made to lie on operating tables caked with blood from other women, and their babies, and STDs were passed between patients by his unsterilized care.
 
The conditions matched Gosnell's shoddy practices. At one point during his closing arguments, an emotional Cameron asked the doctor, "Are you human?" Gosnell remained unmoved. ""He just sat there for the past eight weeks smirking," said juror David Misko. "It was just business as usual, and he snipped the [newborn babies'] necks no matter what happened."
 
Keeping the facilities dank and the equipment outdated helped pad the bottom line. Gosnell raked in between $1.8 and $2 million a year plying his trade among Philadelphia's slums.
 
Despite his money living in filth was a way of life for the doctor, who practiced at his Women's Medical Society as well as a facility in Delaware, where he has avoided facing charges. Philadelphia Police Crimes Scene Unit Detective John Taggart, who raided one of his many properties, said he lived in "squalor."
 
"He would leave plates of food on the floor. There was stuff everywhere in the bedroom. You couldn't see the bed," he said. "As soon as [investigators] went down into the basement, they were covered in fleas."
 
A mostly "pro-choice" jury convicted Gosnell of three counts of first-degree murder on May 13, as well as one count of involuntary manslaughter and hundreds of abortion law violations. The 72-year-old is serving three consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole.

House Bill Would Limit Speech of Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers

 
Source: CitizenLink
 
Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) sent a letter to federal lawmakers Wednesday warning them about the unconstitutional nature of a bill that would require the Federal Trade Commission to monitor the speech of local, nonprofit pro-life pregnancy resource centers.
 
"Pregnancy resource centers provide compassionate support and real choice for the mother, her family, and the community," said ADF Senior Counsel Casey Mattox. "They should be free to share their message,"
 
In its letter, ADF reminds members of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce that these charities are protected by the First Amendment.
 
"We would encourage the House to carefully consider the constitutionality of this proposed law and the experience of localities in adopting similar laws," the letter states.
 
Similar laws enacted by local governments across the country mandate that pro-life centers post messages discouraging women from using their free services. None of the laws affect abortion sellers.
 
"At a time when regulating the abortion industry should be the focus, pro-abortion advocates continue to try to silence pro-life pregnancy centers — a true source of choice for women," said Carrie Gordon Earll, senior director of Issues Analysis for CitizenLink.
 
Abortion activists are concerned that these pro-life centers could harm abortion sellers, Mattox added.
 
"The real worry of the abortion lobby and some in Congress is that pregnancy centers will serve people for free and give them lasting help, cutting into the bottom line of big abortion sellers like Planned Parenthood."
 
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Read ADF's letter to the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce regarding H.R. 2030.

IRS wanted pro-life group's assurance they would not picket Planned Parenthood

 
Source: Illinois Review
 
Tuesday, Coalition for Life of Iowa founder Susan Martinek testified to the House Ways and Means Committee on the harassment and intolerance her organization was subjected to by the Internal Revenue Service. Tom Brejcha, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Society, accompanied Martinek to the hearing as her counsel.
 
"Coalition for Life of Iowa's testimony today, coupled with the many other pro-life organizations we've represented against the IRS, make it undisputedly clear that pro-life organizations were systematically treated in an unfair and biased manner by the IRS," said Brejcha. "Even New York Representative Charles Rangel, a liberal Democrat, referred to a 'cancer' inside the IRS that must be fixed."
 
Martinek shared how the religious and educational group she heads, an organization already incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation under Iowa law, was asked to surrender First Amendment rights of assembly, free speech, and religious expression. "In particular," she recalled, "the IRS wanted our assurances that we would not bother Planned Parenthood!"
 
"The IRS's questions centered on our educational activities, potential political activities, our prayer groups, and signage," explained Martinek. Coalition for Life of Iowa was verbally directed by IRS Agent Ms. Richards to sign, under penalty of perjury, a declaration that they would not picket Planned Parenthood, and told that, once the signed declaration was sent, they would receive their IRS determination letter.
 
Martinek shared details of the harassment, which Brejcha labeled as "blatant and offensive," and she told the Committee, "I speak today so that what happened to us – the IRS's demonstrated harassment, improper questions, and intolerance toward our message – may not happen to others."
 
Martinek testified alongside other witnesses including Tea Party advocates and the Chairman of the National Organization for Marriage. Her testimony repeatedly drew questions from members of Congress sitting on the Ways and Means Committee on both sides of the aisle.

Pain-capable abortion ban passes congressional subcommittee

 
Source: Catholic News Agency
 
By a vote of 6 to 4, the U.S. House Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice approved a bill on Tuesday that would ban abortions after 20 weeks of gestation.
 
The bill, introduced by Congressman Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), is based on mounting evidence which indicates that unborn children can feel pain at 20 weeks gestation and possibly earlier.
 
Rep. Franks said he hoped the recent trial of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell had created a "teachable moment" on the reality of late-term abortions in the U.S. Gosnell was convicted last month of murdering babies who survived his late-term abortions. He was accused of mistreating patients and running an unsanitary clinic with blood-stained rooms and filthy equipment.
 
"We, as a nation, find ourselves at a point at which we don't offer unborn children even the most basic protections – even protections we extend to animals and property," Franks said in a press release.
 
"The trial of Kermit Gosnell exposed late abortions for what they really are: relocated infanticide."
 
The Susan B. Anthony List, a national pro-life group, released a statement of support for the bill upon its advancement.
 
"We praise Congress' recent action not only to protect the lives of children capable of feeling pain, but to learn more about the practices going on inside late-term abortion facilities throughout the country," said the group's president, Marjorie Dannenfelser.
 
The SBA List is also participating in a new "Stop the Gosnells" coalition as an effort to encourage increased legislation addressing the impact of late-term abortions on women, children and society. The group has sent nearly 40,000 messages to representatives nationwide, calling for a ban on late-term abortions.
 
While the proposed legislation will need to pass several more hurdles to become law, Franks said he hopes to see it advance in the legislature.
 
"We are better than dismembering babies who can feel every excruciating moment," the congressman said. "I look forward to the bill's moving on the full Judiciary Committee and to an eventual vote on this necessary, common-sense measure."

May 31, 2013

Vote Next Week on Congressional Bill Banning Abortions at 20 Weeks

Contact Steven Ertelt | LifeNews.com
 
Members of a U.S. House committee will cast a vote on a congressional bill that would ban abortions nationwide at 20 weeks of pregnancy.
 
The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice, chaired by bill author Rep. Trent Franks, an Arizona Republican, will hold a markup on H.R. 1797 on Tuesday. After lawmakers debate the bill, a vote is expected.
 
Franks has announced he will amend his bill, the "D.C. Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" (H.R. 1797) to apply nationwide.  With this change, the "Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" will be a national prohibition on abortions of unborn children who can feel pain during the abortion process.
 

 
Congressman Franks believes the national abortion ban is timely in light of the conviction of abortionist Kermit Gosnell and news reports of potentially similar gruesome late abortion practitioners around the country.
 
"I know when the subject is related in any way to abortion, the doors of reason and human compassion in our minds and hearts often close, and the humanity of the unborn can no longer be seen. But I pray we can at least come together to agree that we can and should draw the line at the point that these innocent babies can feel the excruciating pain of these brutal procedures," he said.
Franks added:  "The case of Kermit Gosnell shocked the sensibilities of millions of Americans. However, the crushing fact is that abortions on babies just like the ones killed by Kermit Gosnell have been happening hundreds of times per day, every single day, for the past 40 years. Indeed, let us not forget that, had Kermit Gosnell dismembered these babies before they had traveled down the birth canal only moments earlier, he would have, in many places nationwide, been performing an entirely legal procedure. If America truly understands that horrifying reality, hearts and laws will change."
 
"To this end, I have re-introduced the D.C. Pain Capable Unborn Protection Act, which will now be amended to broaden its coverage so that its provisions will apply nationwide," he said. "Knowingly subjecting our innocent unborn children to dismemberment in the womb, particularly when they have developed to the point that they can feel excruciating pain every terrible moment leading up to their undeserved deaths, belies everything America was called to be. This is not who we are."
During a hearing last week, former abortion practitioner Dr. Anthony Levatino made national news for his testimony about his abortion practice and his call for the abortion ban to be enacted.
 
The move to expand the bill to ban abortions after 20 weeks nationwide has the strong support of the National Right to Life Committee.
 
"National Right to Life strongly concurs in Congressman Franks' decision that the time is ripe to seek protection for pain-capable unborn children nationwide," said NRLC Legislative Director Douglas Johnson. "Because of publicity surrounding the trial of Kermit Gosnell and subsequent revelations about other abortionists, many Americans are becoming aware for the first time that abortions are frequently performed late in pregnancy on babies who are capable of being born alive, and on babies who will experience great pain while being killed."
 
Johnson says that in a nationwide poll of 1,003 registered voters in March, The Polling Company found that 64% would support a law such as the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act prohibiting abortion after 20 weeks — when an unborn baby
Johnson added that the federal bill contains legislative findings and operative language very similar to bills already enacted in nine states, beginning in 2010, based on model legislation prepared by NRLC. Like those state laws, Mr. Franks' legislation contains findings of fact regarding the medical evidence that unborn children experience pain at least by 20 weeks after fertilization (which is 22 weeks in the "LMP" system, or about the start of the sixth month), and prohibits abortion after that point, except when an acute physical condition endangers the life of the mother.
 
During the 2011-12 Congress, Mr. Franks' bill garnered 222 co-sponsors in the 435-member House, and received the support of a majority of House members on July 31, 2012 (roll call no. 539).
 
The science behind the concept of fetal pain is fully established and Dr. Steven Zielinski, an internal medicine physician from Oregon, is one of the leading researchers into it. He first published reports in the 1980s to validate research showing evidence for it.
He has testified before Congress that an unborn child could feel pain at "eight-and-a-half weeks and possibly earlier" and that a baby before birth "under the right circumstances, is capable of crying."
 
He and his colleagues Dr. Vincent J. Collins and Thomas J. Marzen  were the top researchers to point to fetal pain decades ago. Collins, before his death, was Professor of Anesthesiology at Northwestern University and the University of Illinois and author of Principles of Anesthesiology, one of the leading medical texts on the control of pain.
 
"The functioning neurological structures necessary to suffer pain are developed early in a child's development in the womb," they wrote.
 
"Functioning neurological structures necessary for pain sensation are in place as early as 8 weeks, but certainly by 13 1/2 weeks of gestation. Sensory nerves, including nociceptors, reach the skin of the fetus before the 9th week of gestation. The first detectable brain activity occurs in the thalamus between the 8th and 10th weeks. The movement of electrical impulses through the neural fibers and spinal column takes place between 8 and 9 weeks gestation. By 13 1/2 weeks, the entire sensory nervous system functions as a whole in all parts of the body," they continued.
 
With Zielinski and his colleagues the first to provide the scientific basis for the concept of fetal pain, Dr. Kanwaljeet Anand of the University of Arkansas Medical Center has provided further research to substantiate their work.
 
"The neural pathways are present for pain to be experienced quite early by unborn babies," explains Steven Calvin, M.D., perinatologist, chair of the Program in Human Rights Medicine, University of Minnesota, where he teaches obstetrics.
Further documentation and links to the scientific studies can be found at: www.doctorsonfetalpain.com.

President Obama’s motorcade confronted with large, graphic images of abortion

 
Contact: John Jansen Reprinted with permission by LifeSiteNews.com from the Pro-life Action League
 
President Barack Obama and Rep. Nancy Pelosi came to Chicago yesterday for a Democratic Party fundraising event, and the Pro-Life Action League was there to confront the presidential motorcade with pictures of aborted babies—victims of the "choice" that Obama and Pelosi, et al. so stridently support.
 
 
When we arrived at the Hilton & Towers shortly before 4:00 to set up for our protest, we found that Chicago Police had set up metal fencing all along Michigan Avenue directly in front of the hotel, effectively eliminating our intended protest area. So instead, we moved our protest across the street from the hotel, which ultimately proved to just as good of a a location.
 
All told, nearly 60 pro-lifers took part, which allowed us to have a full two blocks covered with large graphic abortion signs as well as handheld signs reading "Stop Abortion Now" and "Obama = Abortion". We also distributed hundreds of flyers [PDF] with the message: "Obama + Pelosi = Abortion without Limits."
 
We weren't the only ones exercising our First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and assembly yesterday. Also across from the Hilton in close proximity to our protest was a coalition of groups urging President Obama to stop deporting undocumented immigrants, as well as another coalition of groups led by the Sierra Club that opposes development of the Keystone XL pipeline.
 
All of this activity made for a vibrant protest scene—as well as some priceless opportunities for one-on-one conversations.
 
Around 5:30, Chicago Police closed Michigan Avenue off entirely in both directions, leaving only Balbo Street (the east-west street at the north end of the hotel) open.  Once we saw two CPD cruisers speeding eastward, it didn't take us long to figure out that Balbo was going to be the presidential motorcade route, so we shifted several of our crack pro-life activist team alongside the metal fencing adjacent to the street.
 
A few minutes later, the president's motorcade passed by, no more than 20 feet away from our large, graphic abortion signs.

What Congress can do to repeal ObamaCare

 
Contact: Chris Woodward, Source OneNewsNow.com
 
Though one congresswoman says the best chance at repealing ObamaCare is after the 2014 election, opponents of the healthcare law don't have to sit and wait until then.
 
Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) tells American Family Radio's "Today's Issues" that there are things that Congress can do now.
 
"They're out of money over at [Health and Human Services], so they were trying to take the prevention fund to stand up navigators," she reports. "You know -- they're going to go out and hire about 150,000 navigators who would help you to choose one of the exchange plans and then enroll in ObamaCare."
 
But Blackburn and her fellow Republicans are trying to drain that fund to put the money into pre-existing insurance healthcare, which will be handled for the next few months by the federal government.
 
"What we're trying to do is redirect that money to make certain people … who need the healthcare have access to that insurance product and then eliminate the ability of HHS to stand up those navigators," the congresswoman details.
 
She also has legislation that requires HHS to put experienced medical professionals, rather than bureaucrats, in preventive service task forces, as the Tennessee lawmaker believes that is a way to hold them accountable.

Hobby Lobby awaits appeals decision

 
Tom Strode is Washington bureau chief for Baptist Press
 
Hobby Lobby's hopes for deliverance by July 1 from huge fines under the Obama administration's abortion/contraception mandate now rest with eight federal appeals court judges.
 
Lawyers representing the chain of arts and crafts stores and the federal government presented oral arguments before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals May 23 in Denver. Hobby Lobby's lawyers asked the judges to block enforcement of the controversial provision before July 1, when a mandate that could result in a penalty of $1.3 million a day takes effect for the company.
 
The team of lawyers for Hobby Lobby was hopeful after the arguments.
 
It appeared the entire court "understands that the stakes are high" for Hobby Lobby's Christian owners, said Adele Keim, legal counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the company.
 
"We were encouraged by how engaged the entire court was during the oral argument."
 
Hobby Lobby filed suit last year against the portion of the 2010 health care reform law that requires employers to pay for coverage of drugs defined by the Food and Drug Administration as contraceptives, even if they can cause abortions. The Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, does not oppose all contraceptive methods, only those that have abortion-causing qualities.
 
These drugs include Plan B and other "morning-after" pills, which possess a secondary, post-fertilization mechanism that can cause an abortion by preventing implantation of tiny embryos. The mandate also covers "ella," which -- in a fashion similar to the abortion drug RU 486 -- can even act after implantation to end the life of the child.
 
A federal judge and a three-judge panel of the 10th Circuit Court refused last year to block enforcement of the mandate, but the appeals court made the highly unusual move in late March of granting a hearing before its full panel of eight active judges.
 
During those May 23 arguments, the Obama administration contended Hobby Lobby's owners do not have religious freedom rights protected by the First Amendment because of the company's for-profit status. The Becket Fund, however, argued the focus of the court in the case should be elsewhere.
 
"We would see the central issue in this case as: Can the government command you to provide and pay for insurance coverage for drugs that you find morally objectionable?" said Keim, who served on the Becket Fund team at the oral arguments while general counsel Kyle Duncan addressed the judges. "The important thing under the Constitution is what the government is doing. The First Amendment is a limitation on government action."
 
The federal government, Keim told Baptist Press, "is arguing there is something special about for-profit corporations, that they don't have First Amendment rights. What we say, and what the Supreme Court has said, [is] that when you're dealing with the First Amendment you don't look at the identity of the person who is asserting the right -- whether they're corporate or a natural person, whether they're for-profit or non-profit -- you look at the action that they're trying to take and whether the government is able to stop them from taking that action."
 
Hobby Lobby's owners have said they will not obey the mandate and have estimated the fines by the government could reach $1.3 million a day.
 
David Green, founder and chief executive officer, and other family members who own Hobby Lobby and the Christian bookstore chain Mardel, another party in the suit, are evangelical Christians. They "believe that life begins at conception and that using those drugs creates a risk of a very early abortion, and that's why [those drugs] are unacceptable to them," Keim said.
 
Hobby Lobby, which has 546 stores in 45 states, seeks to honor God "by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles," according to its statement of purpose. Its stores are closed on Sundays. The Oklahoma City-based chain contributes to Christian organizations selected by the Green family that seek "to share the Good News of Jesus Christ to all the world," according to its website.
 
Sixty lawsuits have been filed against the abortion/contraception mandate, and Hobby Lobby is one of only seven for-profit companies that have failed to win an injunction or restraining order blocking enforcement of the controversial requirement while their suits proceed in court, according to the Becket Fund. Courts have granted injunctions to 19 for-profit corporations. No action has been taken in five for-profit lawsuits.
 
No court has so far ruled on the merits of any of the lawsuits by non-profit organizations.
 
The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission has signed onto five briefs defending the religious freedom of entities challenging the mandate at the appeals court level. One was in the Hobby Lobby case.
 
The Becket Fund, which is based in Washington, D.C., defends freedom of religion for all faith groups.

Court lets Planned Parenthood funding stand

 
Compiled by Tom Strode, Washington bureau chief for Baptist Press.
 
Indiana's effort to bar state-directed Medicaid funds from going to Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers has met an apparent dead end.
 
The U.S. Supreme Court refused May 28 to review a lower court's invalidation of a 2011 law challenged by Planned Parenthood, the country's leading abortion provider. The high court's refusal meant a ruling by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals against a ban on Medicaid reimbursements for abortion providers will stand, but it also included a victory for pro-lifers. The action enabled a state ban on some federal block grants for abortion providers to continue.
 
The case will return to a federal court, which temporarily blocked enforcement of the law in 2011, for what is expected to be a win for Planned Parenthood and its allies, according to The Indianapolis Star.
 
Supporters of the law expressed their disappointment in the Supreme Court's unwillingness to accept the appeal.
 
"Indiana lawmakers -- and the people they represent -- should have the right to decide whether their hard-earned tax dollars end up in the hands of the abortion industry," said Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life.
 
The justices "missed an opportunity to clarify, once and for all, that states may cut the abortion industry off from all sources of taxpayer funding," Yoest said in a written release. "Big Abortion has no constitutional right to force Americans to support its deadly industry with tax dollars."
 
U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman, a Republican from Indiana, said the justices "failed the American people today. Abortion providers should provide for themselves and not be subsidized by taxpayers."
 
Planned Parenthood, which receives more than $500 million a year in government money, applauded the Supreme Court's refusal of the appeal.
 
"This has been a long fight, but one that has been worthwhile because we've been fighting on behalf of our patients and their access to lifesaving, preventive care such as Pap tests, breast and testicular exams, birth control and STD testing and treatment," said Betty Cockrum, president of Planned Parenthood of Indiana.
 
While Planned Parenthood contends Medicaid funding goes toward non-abortion services, pro-life advocates say the money can be used interchangeably and frees up other funds for the organization's abortion business.
 
Affiliates of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America reported performing 333,964 abortions during 2010-11, the most recent year for which statistics are available. That was an annual record for the organization. Planned Parenthood also established a record for funds received from federal, state and local governments -- $542.4 million in grants and reimbursements during the latest fiscal year.

Study documents abortion's global health threat to women

 
Source: CNA/EWTN News
 
A new study released during the 66th annual World Health Assembly identified and exposed what it claimed to be the harmful and often overlooked impact that abortion has on women's health.
 
Decades-long research analysis issued by Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life Global Outreach and National Right to Life Educational Trust Fund makes the case that rather than being a routine medical procedure, abortion is detrimental to the health of women globally.
 
"The evidence is overwhelming: abortion is dangerous for women," executive director Scott Fischbach of Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life Global Outreach said in a May 22 statement.
 
The analysis "How Abortion Hurts Women" released during the World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, examined the harmful side effects of abortion that are often overlooked or even "exacerbated" when performed in developing nations.
 
"Abortion is by its very nature a violent and damaging procedure," Fischbach said.
 
The study shows that women who have undergone abortions – both surgical and non-surgical – in are at greater risk of breast cancer, pre-term birth, infertility and psychological problems than those who have not had abortions.
 
These risks are increased in areas where the quality of maternal healthcare is lacking, the report shows.
 
"The incidence of maternal mortality is mainly determined by the quality of maternal health care. Legalization does not improve outcomes, but only increases the number of women subjected to the risks of abortion," Jeanne Head, R.N., National Right to Life vice-president for international affairs and U.N. representative said in the statement.
 
Rather than promoting the legalization of abortion worldwide, the group suggested that the World Health Organization adopt measures that "protect women from abortion" while at the same time working to "improve women's health care."
 
The release of the analysis came just before the May 27 close of the World Health Assembly where a resolution passed which placed contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs in the category of "life-saving commodities for women and children," along with antibiotics and oral rehydration salts.
 
In the resolution, Member States of the World Health Organization are urged to "improve the quality, supply and use" of said "life-saving commodities" as well as "develop plans to increase demand and facilitate universal access."
 
The resolution focused upon the promotion of female condoms, contraceptive implants and emergency contraception. These methods rank among the least popular modern artificial modes of preventing pregnancy, according to a 2009 study by the United Nations.
 
Implanted contraceptives are a long-acting hormonal device injected under the woman's skin, halting the woman's natural cycle of ovulation for up to three years. It must be inserted and removed by a doctor.
 
Emergency contraceptives have generated controversy for their potential to induce early abortions. While all forms can prevent ovulation, it is not known if these drugs can prevent the embryo from taking root in the mother implanting in the mother's uterus.
 
Additionally, certain types of emergency contraception, specifically the drug ulipristal, is nearly chemically identical to the drug used for medical abortions, mifopristal, and is labeled as toxic to fetuses.

May 30, 2013

Gosnell's wife sentenced, calls husband 'cowardly'

 
Contact: Charlie Butts, Source: OneNewsNow.com
 
The wife of Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell will follow her husband to prison for her role in the death of a patient at her husband's abortion clinic.
 
Micaiah Bilger of the Pennsylvania Pro-life Federation says Pearl Gosnell was a cosmetologist who had undergone "very little" medical training.
 
"She was trained by her husband," Bilger explains, "but I would put that training in quotes, because none of Gosnell's staff was properly medically trained or licensed."
 
In a plea deal, Pearl Gosnell, 51, pleaded guilty to racketeering and performing an illegal abortion past Pennsylvania's 24-week limit, the Associated Press reports. She told the court her husband told her the abortions were legal.
 
According to Bilger, Pearl Gosnell performed abortions on Sundays with her husband, when other medical staff was not present at the clinic.
 
"And these were allegedly even the later-term abortions that were happening," Bilgers says, "so we just can't imagine the horrors that went on that she helped with."
 
Pearl Gosnell admitted her crimes in court, apologized for them, and called her husband "cowardly" for not doing the same.
 
Kermit Gosnell is serving three life sentences after he was found guilty of killing babies born alive after abortions.

All signs are that Gosnell will plead guilty June 6 to illegally writing thousands of prescriptions for controlled substances

 
Contact: Dave Andrusko, Source: NRLC
 
There were broad hints from Kermit Gosnell's attorney on the day the abortionist was convicted of three counts of first degree murder that his client would plead guilty to charges that he operated what the grand jury described as a "pill mill."
 
A further and unmistakable sign was that yesterday he filed a "change-of-plea notice "with the U.S. Attorney's Office. That new plea will be formally entered in front of U.S. District Court Judge Cynthia M. Rufe June 6.
 
"Gosnell and six of his employees are accused of writing thousands of prescriptions for controlled substances with no legitimate medical purpose between June 2008 and February 2010," The Philadelphia Daily News reported. "According to the indictment, Gosnell made more than $200,000 on the scam."
 
NRL News Today has frequently mentioned the irony that Gosnell's "Baby Charnel House" was discovered only because local and federal authorities raided his house for evidence he was distributing drugs, Oxycontin in particular. But a closer look at the grand jury report indicates that a member of the District Attorney's office came along because he had heard of a woman dying at Gosnell's Women's Medical Society. The way the two intersect—the illegal prescriptions and what turned out to be Gosnell's "House of Horrors"– can be summarized in four bullet points.
 
(From the section of the report titled, "The Raid.")
 
#1. The FBI and local authorities executing search warrants on February 18, 2010, as part of a drug-trafficking investigation ("illegal prescription drug activity"). But prior to the raid, they'd heard of a woman who had died the previous November [Karnamaya Mongar].
 
#2. During the drug trafficking investigation, they learned that "Gosnell routinely relied on unlicensed and untrained staff to treat patients, conduct medical tests, and administer medications without supervision. Even more alarmingly, Gosnell instructed unlicensed workers to sedate patients with dangerous drugs in his absence."
 
#3. District Attorney's Detective James Wood believed the woman's death needed further investigation. "The detective searched for a police report on the incident, but finding none, he went to the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office to try to identify the woman and to find out more about her death. Detective Wood learned that the dead woman was Karnamaya Mongar, and that her toxicology report revealed an extremely high level of Demerol, a drug Gosnell used at the clinic to anesthetize patients."
 
#4. Putting this all this together—"this suspicious death and the other significant health and medical concerns"—DEA Agent Stephen Dougherty "invited personnel from the Pennsylvania Department of State (which regulates doctors and the practice of medicine) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health (which regulates health care facilities) to accompany law enforcement officers on the February 18 raid. No one from these agencies had visited the clinic in more than 15 years, even after the Department of Health had been informed of Mrs. Mongar's death months earlier."