November 15, 2010

Sarah Palin Warns ObamaCare ‘Biggest Advance’ of U.S. Abortion Industry



     Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told a massive crowd of pro-life advocates at a Dallas fundraiser that the new health care law passed by Congress in March would lead to an unprecedented expansion of abortion.

"The biggest advance of the abortion industry in America has been the passage of Obamacare," Palin said at Dallas's Majestic Theatre to a crowd of 800 people.

"It is even worse than what we had thought. The ramifications of this legislation are horrendous."

Palin was speaking at a fundraising event for Heroic Media, an organization that is seeking to bring down Dallas's abortion rates by connecting women in crisis with hopeful pro-life messages and resources through the media.

The Dallas Observer reports Heroic Media intends to launch a $632,000 media campaign in the area for Spring 2011.

Heroic Media claims that in previous markets where they have launched their pro-life ad campaigns the abortion rate has dropped as much as 24 percent.

Palin, a GOP political icon admired by many Tea Party conservatives, said President Obama's executive order was insufficient to stop the law's expansion of the abortion industry. She cited the abortion mandates discovered by the National Right to Life Committee in some state plans for high-risk insurance pools as an example.

Palin also encouraged the new Congress to repeal or defund the national health care reform law, the Affordable Care Act, which she called the "mother of all unfunded mandates."

The former governor also told the audience about her own personal pro-life convictions, and described herself as "unapologetically pro-life." She also said the experiences of giving birth to a child diagnosed with Down syndrome, and having a 17-year-old unmarried pregnant daughter, actually reinforced those convictions.

Contact: 
Peter J. Smith
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: November 12, 2010

November 12, 2010

NRLC Analysis -- Voters Rebuked 'Pro-life' Supporters of Obama Health Care Law



     Vote counting machine

In an analysis solicited by a blogger for the National Catholic Reporter and posted on that paper's website yesterday, National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) Legislative Director Douglas Johnson asserts that last week's election results represent a strong repudiation of lawmakers who voted for the health care law enacted last March, and discredit the attempts of certain organizations to whitewash the pro-abortion components of that bill.

Hiding behind a hollow executive order signed by President Obama (which, as Johnson points out, even "the president of Planned Parenthood accurately dismissed as 'a symbolic gesture'), two organizations in particular -- Democrats for Life of America (DFLA) and Catholics United -- attempted to provide political cover for a group of Democrat "pro-life" lawmakers who flip-flopped and provided the votes that allowed the law to be enacted without effective pro-life language.  As Johnson writes, the electorate was not fooled: "The bloc of Democrats who abandoned the pro-life movement to satisfy President Obama and Speaker Pelosi suffered severe losses. In all, at least a dozen House incumbents who had taken high-profile stands against federal funding of abortion, but who ended up voting for the health care law, were defeated by pro-life challengers (or, in Stupak's case, suddenly retired)."  He also notes that, "[f]ar greater losses were sustained among the ranks of House Democrats who had seldom or never voted pro-life: upwards of 40 were replaced by firmly pro-life Republicans."

Johnson also points to a post-election poll conducted for National Right to Life by the Polling Company which asked: "'Did the issue of funding for abortion in the Obama health care law affect the way you voted in today's election?'  31% of voters responded in the affirmative -- 27% who said they voted "for candidates who opposed the health care law," and 4% who said they voted "for candidates who favored the health care law." In other words, 87% of the voters who said the issue mattered, voted in accord with the NRLC position."

Johnson wrote, "The election results were good in the Senate, as well, where the net shift in the pro-life direction will be from four to seven votes, depending on the issue. No senator is being replaced by a successor who has a weaker position on abortion. . . . "

Click here for the full text of Mr. Johnson's analysis can be found on the National Catholic Reporter blog of Michael Sean Winters

Contact:
Jessica Rodgers
Source: National Right to Life Committee
Publish Date: November 11, 2010

Planned Parenthood Got $349.6 Million in Tax Dollars, Performed 324,008 Abortions, Paid Its President $385,163


     Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards

Planned Parenthood received $349.6 million in tax dollars in the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2008, and it paid its president, Cecile Richards, $385,163, plus another $11,876 in benefits and deferred compensation.

According to a "fact sheet" published by the organization, Planned Parenthood Affiliate Health Centers performed 324,008 abortions in 2008.

Planned Parenthood's fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2008 is the latest year for which the organization has publicly released an annual report and published the annual sum of grants and contracts it received from the government.

The $385,163 in pay Planned Parenthood President Richards received in the organization's fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 was recorded in the group's publicly available Internal Revenue Service Form 990 filed for that year.
Richards also received $346,285 in total compensation from Planned Parenthood and $38,476 in total compensation from related groups in the organization's fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2009, according to the organization's Form 990 for that year.

Planned Parenthood did not respond to repeated inquiries from CNSNews.com about Cecile Richards' compensation.
In January 2009, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) introduced legislation to defund Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers that receive taxpayer funding. His bill, H.R. 614, would amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit "providing any federal family planning assistance to an entity unless the entity certifies that, during the period of such assistance, the entity will not perform, and will not provide any funds to any other entity that performs an abortion."

"Congressman Pence will continue to fight for the unborn and intends to reintroduce his legislation to defund Planned Parenthood this coming Congress," Mary Vought, press secretary for the House Republican Congress, told CNSNews.com.

The bill was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on Jan. 21, 2009 where it has since languished.

Contact:
Penny Starr
Source: CNSNews.com
Publish Date:
November 11, 2010

Planned Parenthood Says Graphic Sex Guide for Youth is a Best Seller



    

The world's leading abortion provider is continuing to promote a graphic brochure advocating casual sex among youth. According to International Planned Parenthood Federation, the brochure called "Healthy, Happy and Hot" has become their most popular publication.

Aimed at young people with HIV, the brochure contains sexually explicit language and promotes casual sex with multiple partners, as well as oral, anal, and homosexual sex.

"Some people like to have aggressive sex," says the brochure.  "There is no right or wrong way to have sex."    It encourages young people who might have sex after drinking or using drugs to "plan ahead by bringing condoms."  Another section suggests readers visit family planning clinics for help in preventing or aborting unplanned pregnancies. 

The publication encourages youth to keep their sexual activity secret from their parents, as well as visits to family planning clinics.  "You should find out whether there are any centers near to you where you can go without needing the permission of your parents or guardians."

The brochure criticizes countries with laws requiring disclosure of HIV status to sexual partners.  Such laws violate the rights of people living with HIV, the pamphlet argues.

Planned Parenthood also distributed the brochure in August at the World Youth Conference in Leon, Mexico.

Originally published in January of this year, "Healthy, Happy and Hot" is now available in a Russian translation.  Russia has the second-highest rate of HIV in Eastern Europe and Eurasia, according to USAID.

The Regional President of Planned Parenthood in Europe is Dr. Elena Dmitrieva, a Russian national who also directs the Healthy Russia Foundation.  Funded by the United States through USAID, the foundation sponsors an ongoing health project there.  Healthy Russia 2020 promotes HIV/AIDS prevention and contraception among youth and other vulnerable populations in Russia.  Its self-proclaimed healthy lifestyles program for youth targets people aged 13-19.

Nearly $77 million in US taxpayer dollars went to programs in Russia in 2008, according to USAID's website.  Part of this $77 million enabled family planning and reproductive health messages to reach more than 25,000 Russians.

This comes despite Russia suffering from a demographic crisis.  The UN predicts that Russia's population will fall by 23 million over the next 40 years.  In response, President Vladimir Putin recently offered $11,000 to reward families who have at least two children.

As C-Fam's Friday Fax reported earlier this year, a Mormon mother spotted the brochure at a closed-door, girls-only meeting sponsored by Girl Scouts USA at UN headquarters in New York. Since then, Girl Scout chapters around the United States have been roiled in a debate about the connections between Girl Scouts and Planned Parenthood. Girl Scouts USA refuses to denounce the brochure and denies the brochure was in the UN room where the young girls met.

This article reprinted by LifeSiteNews.com with permission from www.c-fam.org

Contact:
Seana Cranston, J.D.
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: November 11, 2010

Survivors training pro-life generation



     Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust
A former trainee at a pro-life group's training camp explains how the two-week event helped him learn how to be an effective pro-life warrior.
 
Josh Devine and his wife, Elizabeth, both took part in the Survivors ProLife Training and Activist program in Los Angeles this past June. The annual event is sponsored by Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust.

"We went through training, which basically prepared us to answer difficult questions, prepared us to dialogue with pro-aborts and basically just prepared us to hold demonstrations," Josh Devine explains.

All participants were informed of what they are allowed to do legally, and demonstrations were held every day at abortion clinics and at the embryonic stem-cell research facility at the University of California at Irvine. After seeing that babies' lives were being saved because of the group's work, Devine decided to begin plans to set up a pro-life group that will work with pregnancy centers.

"We want them to make the right decision, so we want to be there as a resource," he shares. "We want to be there spreading awareness, showing what abortion actually looks like, and that's how we're going to utilize what we learned at Survivors."

Devine encourages other young people to participate in the training, then carry the pro-life message forward, because he believes they are part of the generation that can make a difference.

Contact:
Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: November 12, 2010

Report: ‘Real Reform’ at Chicago CCHD Being Dismantled



      Catholic Campaign for Human Development

Facing pressure from the old guard at the local and national level, the Chicago branch of the Catholic Campaign for Human Development has begun dismantling the "real reform" that earned it so much praise from pro-life groups in the summer.

"Despite the attempts made by some well-intentioned individuals in the Archdiocese of Chicago's CCHD, the powers-that-be at the USCCB and some local bishops and priests have plans to return to the national CCHD's guidelines with this program," said former Chicago CCHD director Rey Flores. Flores, among others, had initiated the reforms with the initial blessing of Cardinal Francis George.

But a cadre of liberal priests, led by Fr. Larry Dowling, has been calling on the cardinal to reverse the reforms, which included approving grants for the life-saving work of crisis pregnancy centers.  As reported by Catholic World News, Dowling claimed in a recent letter, for example, that it is insulting for grantees to be asked whether they advocate for abortion or same-sex "marriage."

The same group of priests, who sought the removal of Flores last March, were recently also targeting Flores' former boss, Office of Peace and Justice Director Nicholas Lund-Molfese.

"People really need to keep the CCHD program in their prayers, especially the Chicago CCHD staff, priests and bishops," said Flores, who lost his position in the fall.

Under Flores' leadership, Chicago's CCHD had committed to defunding any group opposing Catholic teaching, particularly on life and family issues, as well as funding groups such as crisis pregnancy centres and the Pro-Life Action League, contrary to previous CCHD practice.

The former director told LSN that the rationale for funding such groups, and for ensuring that grantees are in line with Church teaching on life and family issues, is that "the lack of respect for the sanctity of life and the destruction of the necessary societal institutions of traditional marriage and family are the major reason for the moral, physical and spiritual poverty we suffer in the western world."

Cardinal George – under the recommendations of Auxiliary Bishop Francis Kane, who serves on the U.S. Bishops' CCHD subcommittee – has agreed to recommit the diocese to CCHD's long-time policy of not funding groups that offer direct service to the poor, and will also require again that grantees' boards be mostly composed of low-income people.

The Chicago reforms, which were held up by pro-life groups as a model for the nationwide organization, were especially significant because Chicago is where CCHD began and their collection still brings in the most funds of any diocese every year.

"For a brief moment in Chicago, we had everyone on the same page," said Flores. "It was awesome to teach people on the social justice side of things about the value of respect life causes as being social justice issues and teaching the respect life warriors about the God-given human dignity of immigrants and workers. I pray that these efforts were not in vain."

"It's sad that the unborn and the innocent poor must suffer because of our misunderstanding of what true social Catholic justice is as Jesus Christ taught us," he added, saying, "We must never sacrifice our Catholic faith and values for secular humanitarian causes."

LifeSiteNews was refused an interview with Lund-Molfese to ask about the status of future funding to pro-life groups.  According to Susan Burritt, the diocese's media relations director, "There has been no change in the policy of the Archdiocese of Chicago regarding groups eligible for CCHD funding.  Reports to the contrary are mistaken."

"While we certainly pray that the new leaders of Chicago's CCHD have the courage to continue Rey Flores' excellent reform effort, it sounds like they're returning to business as usual," said Michael Hichborn, American Life League's lead researcher on the CCHD. "Given the push to remove Flores from his post by a member of the CCHD's subcommittee, one has to wonder just how committed to reform the National CCHD office really is."

"We really commend Rey for his courage and fidelity to the Church for working so hard to make these reforms as the CCHD director," said Hichborn.  "But the strength and courage it took to go public with what really happened is a sign of his deep faith in Christ."

Contact Information:

Cardinal Francis George, Archbishop of Chicago
PO Box 1979
Chicago, IL. 60690-1979
Phone: 312-534-8230
Fax: 312-534-6379
E-Mail: archbishop@archchicago.org

Contact:
Patrick B. Craine
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: November 11, 2010

'Hush Hush' E-Mail Reveals Back-Room Deal to Ignore Illegal Abortions in North Dakota


     Red River Women's Clinic
Operation Rescue has learned through an intercepted secret e-mail that the North Dakota State Board of Medical Examiners (NDBME) has notified the Red River Women's Clinic, the only abortion clinic in North Dakota, that the license of abortionist Lori Lynn Holst Thorndike has been restored and is currently in "Active-Unconditioned" status in spite of her operating illegally without an active medical license in that state since June 30, 2010.
 
This news particularly shocked pro-life activists at Operation Rescue and at local pro-life offices because there had been some indication given by the NDBME that a decision would not be made until the Board met on November 19, 2010.
 
The NDBME has attempted to downplay Thorndike's lack of active licensure by indicating that it was an "administrative oversight."
 
"It's unbelievable that the Board would decide to overlook clear criminal activity and make a back-room deal to restore Thorndike's license while leading pro-life supporters to believe that they are still looking into the matter," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. "If that's true, that's a dishonest and unethical way to deal with the concerned public."
 
Tammi Kromenaker, Director of the Red River Women's Clinic, expressed relief at the news in a secret e-mail sent to supporters. She told her readers to "keep it hush hush" until after the NDMBE meeting scheduled for November 19th. Referring to the reinstatement of Thorndike's license, Kromenaker wrote, "Whew!...This pretty much made my month [two smile face icons]. We are pretty happy around here & doing some happy dances." Kromenaker included an attachment from the NDBME web site showing Thorndike's newly restored license status.
 
North Dakota law is specific that only licensed physicians may legally do abortions. It is a Class B Felony to commit abortions without a license in that state.
Even the NDBME Executive Secretary Duane Houdek admits that Thorndike operated without a valid medical license. "It could be that she practiced once or twice," Houdek told the local newspaper on October 30, 2010.

The NDBME web site had showed that Thorndike's license status was "Inactive - Expired." Then yesterday, a week and a half before NDBME officials announced they would make a decision, Thorndike's license now appears in good standing.

"While the Board may be trying to sweep this illegal abortion scandal under the rug, there can be no doubt that crimes have been committed. The Attorney General still has yet to decide if criminal charges should be filed," said Newman. "It is time for the public to let the Board know that their protection of illegal abortion activity is unconscionable and to remind the Attorney General that it is his duty to enforce North Dakota laws."

Contact:
Troy Newman, President
Source: Operation Rescue
Publish Date: November 11, 2010

‘Cheaper Than Free’ Birth Control Spells C-O-E-R-C-I-O-N



     Contraception

Next week, an independent agency and a team of "experts" will meet to discuss the issue of contraception and will advise the government about whether contraception should be considered preventive health care. Should this group determine that it is, millions of women could be receiving abortifacients at taxpayers' expense.

Unless there is a loud outcry from the American people, all prescription birth control will very likely be listed as preventive health care under the Obama administration's health care reform act by August of next year—leaving the taxpayers to foot the bill for billions more dollars that will flow into Planned Parenthood's bottomless money pit to pay for deadly concoctions that are neither "preventive" nor "health care."

And, according to the philosophy of the leader of the Institute of Medicine, the non-governmental agency advising the government on this matter, it could result in health care incentives being given to those who use birth control -- incentives that are not available to those who spurn it.

In an e-mail from the Planned Parenthood Action Fund in March following the adoption of Obamacare, Planned Parenthood Federation of America President Cecile Richards wrote, "Anti-family-planning groups will no doubt try to keep the Women's Health Amendment from covering family planning services. But family planning is preventive health care. … The administration must include all forms of contraception as part of the preventive health care covered under the new law—and it's up to us to make it happen."

To facilitate forcing its agenda down our throats, Planned Parenthood has launched its "Birth Control Matters" campaign, seeking one million signatures on a petition being circulated on college campuses and elsewhere to "make prescription birth control available to every woman without co-pays or other out-of-pocket costs…"

Despite all its empty, deceptive rhetoric about expanding health coverage to the poor, Planned Parenthood, in all its diabolic wisdom, realizes something most Americans don't: If it succeeds in getting birth control on the list of preventive services in the health care reform law, not only will new health insurance plans be required to fully cover the cost, but state Medicaid programs will be required de facto to cover the full cost of even the most expensive, invasive forms of birth control, such as implants and IUDs, to millions of women with incomes well above poverty level, providing an instant pot of gold for the abortion and birth control mogul.

For years, Planned Parenthood has been trying to force all health care plans to pay for birth control, to force pharmacists to dispense abortifacient birth control despite conscientious objection, and to force all emergency rooms, including those operated by Catholic hospitals, to dispense abortifacient "emergency contraception."

In 2007, Planned Parenthood touted its Prevention First campaign, also known as the Medicaid Family Planning Option, to try to force its will on those who objected. But when it was dropped from President Obama's stimulus package, Planned Parenthood responded, "We are working with members of Congress and the Obama administration to ensure that the provision is sent to the president in the next possible vehicle."

The abortion mammoth soon found that vehicle with the help of Senator Barbara Mikulski who succeeded in incorporating the so-called "Women's Health Amendment" into the Obama administration's health care takeover. While Mikulski managed to keep the focus of discussion about the amendment on free mammograms, she cleared the way for the listing of anything that HHS, headed by notorious abortion supporter Kathleen Sebelius, decided to list as preventive care.

A "panel of experts" will be convened this month to advise Sebelius on what should be considered preventive care.

That panel will be convened by the Institute of Medicine, whose president, Harvey Fineberg, stated in his October 2009 annual address, Health Reform Beyond Health Insurance, that a great way to remedy the current crisis in health care coverage is to require employees to pay tax on the value of employer-provided health insurance—not suddenly, so as to rile the peasants, but gradually, over a period of years.

According to Fineberg, this would "generate hundreds of billions of dollars in tax revenues to ease the public burden of health costs."

This gradual taxing is akin to placing a frog in warm water and slowly turning up the heat so he never notices he's being boiled to death. The American taxpayer must be alert so he does not become that frog.

And on the subject of preventive care Fineberg stated, "I want prevention to be cheaper than free," insinuating that incentives will also be provided. "We should reward individuals with insurance reductions, with access to additional services, and with outright bonuses for doing the right thing for their health," he said.

Taking that to the next logical step, it is easy to foresee that those who use free birth control will receive reductions in the cost of health insurance, access to services those who choose not to contracept cannot access, and other "bonuses" not afforded those who spurn birth control.

The National Academies, which encompasses the Institute of Medicine, was set up by President Lincoln as a non-governmental agency to advise the government on matters of science and technology, and is funded almost entirely by tax dollars. We must send a loud, clear, message to the Institute of Medicine and to our members of Congress that we will not tolerate paying billions of tax-generated dollars to provide free prescription birth control.

The first meeting of the "panel of experts" convened by the National Institute of Medicine will take place on Nov. 16. Please act today to insist that the American taxpayer is not forced to pay the enormous bill and suffer the consequences of "free" or—God forbid—"cheaper than free" birth control.

Contact:
Judie Brown
Source: CNSNews.com
Publish Date:
November 12, 2010

November 11, 2010

NRLC Sets December 7 as Date for State Strategy Conference


    Speaker of the Legislature Mike Flood with NRLC's State Legislative Director
 
Of course it was huge news last week that the GOP made tremendous gains in Congress, but those election results seem to have drown out an even more impressive wave in state legislatures. Republicans picked up 680 seats which is the largest ever for them. The only other turnover that comes close was the 1974 elections following the Watergate scandal in which Democrats picked up 628 seats in state legislatures.

This is of vital importance to pro-lifers because chances of passing pro-life legislation are dead in the water in legislatures controlled by pro-abortion Democrats. There are a total of 99 state-level chambers [houses and senates]. After the mid-term elections, the GOP has majorities in 58. For some states, this is the first time the GOP has had control of both chambers.

Thus it is immensely important to maintain focus and coordination to ensure that the pro-life movement capitalizes on these conditions to advance the cause. National Right to Life announced yesterday a state legislative strategy conference to be held in the Washington, D.C., area on December 7 (
www.nrlc.org/News_and_Views/Nov10/nv110910.html). The short advance notice suggests just how urgent both the subject matter and the opportunities are.

With the news out only one day, we have already received a tremendous response through our state offices. Pro-life lawmakers are eager to discuss legislation like Nebraska's "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" bills to ensure that women contemplating abortion can see ultrasound of their unborn children, bills to "opt-out" of abortion coverage in state insurance exchanges mandated by the new Obama Health Care Law, and many others.

These kinds of meetings have always yielded positive results in the past ensuring the protection of unborn children. Is it exciting to know we have so much hard work ahead of us.

Contact: Luis Zaffirini

Source: NRLC

How Dare You Compare Abortion to the Holocaust or Slavery?


     Bryon Kemper, the founder and president of Stand True Ministries, a Christ-centered pro-life group.

I have heard many people cry foul whenever any pro-lifer uses the Jewish Holocaust or slavery in America as a comparison to abortion. Many times at my talks someone will scold me during question-and-answer time, claiming to be offended that I would use such a comparison.

The problem they have is not really the fact that a comparison is being made to one of these horrific tragedies; after all, we build museums, memorials and reminders of what happened to make sure something like the Jewish Holocaust will never happen again. The problem really is that we have elevated what they consider to be a blob of tissue to personhood status.

If comparison in and of itself were the problem, then we would not go to such great lengths to educate society about what happened. The reason places like Auschwitz are open for the public is to guarantee that we understand the horror of what took place in the death camps.

This is precisely the reason we use such imagery. We want to the world to understand that what makes us so sick about Jewish Holocaust is precisely what makes us sick about the Abortion Holocaust. We talk about the Dred Scott Supreme Court Decision because we want people to see that Roe v. Wade is just as despicable.

The same reason these people are so upset about pro-lifers using these comparisons is the very reason we use them: personhood. We have a duty to use the tools that history has given us to educate future generations about the bloodshed that has already destroyed the lives of over 52,000,000 innocent American baby boys and girls.

Dred Scott declared that human persons with black skin were not actually human persons, but only 3/5 human. Adolf Hitler and the Nazis decided that human persons who were of Jewish heritage were not actually human persons, but some kind of pest or rodent that needed exterminating. Roe v. Wade pronounced that human persons who were in the first nine months of their human development were not human persons unless their mother decided they were.

How can we not have learned our lessons about trying to redefine personhood? How is it that we still have audacity to play God and strip away personhood rights from another group of people, this time simply because of their age?

We know that skin color does not determine the personhood of a human being; they are human no matter what shade their skin is. We know that nationality does not determine the personhood of a human being; they are human not matter where they come from. We should also know that age does not determine the personhood of a human being; they are human from the moment they start living until the day they die.

Some try to claim that a human being does not start living until nine months after his or her development starts, which really does not make any sense at all. From the very second the development of a human being starts, the thing developing is a human being. These human persons cannot suddenly become another species; they remain human beings throughout their development. That development starts the moment the sperm and egg unite and ends when that human person dies. From zygote, embryo, fetus, infant, toddler, teen, adult to senior, the human being cycles through different stages of his or her life, until natural death.

The fact is these comparisons have to be made in order to show the full scope of the tragedy that took place on January 22, 1973. I would argue that we should be offended if we don't compare these events and use these historical tools to show the world the truth about the Abortion Holocaust.

It is obvious that we have not yet learned from the unthinkable acts of human destruction in history and the ignorance that led to such devastation. We are obligated to take these lessons and teach people the truth in hopes we can end the plague of child killing that is abortion.

I would go as far as saying, "How dare we not compare the Abortion Holocaust to the American Slave Trade, the Jewish Holocaust or any other catastrophic evil in history?"

This article reprinted by LifeSiteNews.com with permission from bryankemper.com

Contact: Bryan Kemper

Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: November 10, 2010

Cord Blood Stem Cells Significantly Improved Cerebral Palsy Symptoms Claim Parents


     Child with Cerebral Palsy

The condition of a 3-year–old child with cerebral palsy in the UK has been significantly improved after treatment with stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood, stored when he was born, the Daily Mail reported Monday. Sasha Browne is thought to be the first British child to be injected with cord blood cells and her parents are reporting that her condition has significantly improved.

Tania and Richard Browne told media that the treatment their daughter received at an unregulated clinic in France has improved her motor control, her ability to speak and her vision.

Mrs. Browne said, "Her walking is streets ahead of what it was before; look at her hand - last time I saw her hand it was really closed and now it is moving more."

"We feel there has been some general improvement in her motor skills and perhaps some improvement in her vision and cognitive ability.

"We can't categorically say this is attributable to the stem cell infusion. However, we and Sasha's therapist feel the improvement has potentially been at a faster rate than it may have occurred, or in comparison with other children with similar abilities."

In the last ten years, leading stem cell scientists have lauded the value of blood taken from the umbilical cord as one of the richest sources of stem cells in the human body. While funding continues to pour in to research using cells derived from human embryos, cord blood research is slowly gaining acceptance as an ethical alternative that is saving lives and curing illnesses.

Professor Colin McGuckin, president and director of the Cell Therapy Research Institute in Lyon, France, recently told Modern Medicare magazine, "Around 20 years ago, only a handful of diseases were being treated with umbilical cord blood stem cells. With the advancement in this field in recent times now over 80 diseases can be treated or supported with stem cells. The advances that have been made are staggering."

In related news, new research has shown a link between the use of IVF for conception and increased risk of cerebral palsy in the child. Researchers at the University of Aarhus in Denmark found that babies born by IVF were more than twice as likely to have cerebral palsy as those conceived naturally.

The journal Human Reproduction reported that the risk was still elevated when the figures were adjusted to account for other factors such as the mother's smoking, or her age.

Contact: Hilary White

Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: November 10, 2010

Minnesota Judge Refuses to Dismiss Case against Online Suicide Predator

     Carlton University student Nadia Kajouji, 18, of Brampton, Ontario

A Minnesota judge has rejected a request to dismiss two felony charges against suicide predator William Melchert-Dinkel on Tuesday, preparing the way for the case to go to trial – a decision that a prominent anti-euthanasia activist has welcomed as a sign that "sanity is prevailing."

Melchert-Dinkel, 48, a former Minnesota nurse who admitted to participating in online chats with 15 to 20 people about suicide, and entering into fake suicide pacts with about 10 people, was charged in April with two counts of aiding suicide in the 2005 hanging death of Mark Drybrough, 32, of Conventry, England, and the 2008 drowning of Carlton University student Nadia Kajouji, 18, of Brampton, Ontario.

Kajouji jumped into the freezing Rideau River in early March 2008. It was later revealed that she had been in conversation in an internet chat group with Melchert-Dinkel, who had been posing as a teenage girl. The man had allegedly urged Kajouji to hang herself in front of a webcam so others could watch and promised he would die with her.

In October, Melchert-Dinkel's defense attorney, Terry Watkins, filed written arguments with the court that sought to have the two charges dropped on free speech grounds.

In the document, Watkins argued that the online communications Melchert-Dinkel used when providing suicide advice was a form of constitutionally protected speech, and that the Minnesota statute criminalizing speech assisting suicide is unconstitutionally vague.

In his decision, Judge Neuville said that the protection of free speech does not extend to online speech that encourages activities that are defined as criminal offenses by state statute.

Minnesota State Statute states that, "Whoever intentionally advises, encourages or assists another in taking the other's own life may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 15 years or to payment of a fine of not more than $30,000, or both."

"It is unquestioned that the state has a compelling interest to protect and preserve life. Prohibiting persons from advising, encouraging, or aiding others to take their own life furthers the State's interest in protecting and preserving life," Judge Neuville wrote.

"[The statute] does not prevent people from expressing opinions or discussing suicide. Rather, the statute only criminalizes a narrow and precise type of speech, i.e., speech that intentionally and directly advises, encourages, or aids a specific person to end their own life. Thus, speech that directly encourages and imminently incites the act of suicide ... falls outside the protection of the First Amendment."

In response to Watkins' argument that the Minnesota statute criminalizing speech assisting suicide is unconstitutionally vague, Judge Neuville wrote that the statute "is definitive enough to allow an ordinary person to know what conduct it prohibits ... and it is not written in a way that encourages discriminatory enforcement. Therefore, the Court finds that [the statute] is not unconstitutionally vague according to the Constitutions of Minnesota and the United States."

Alex Schadenberg, the chairman of the euthanasia prevention coalition, said that, "William Melchert-Dinkel should be prosecuted and sentenced as if he were sitting with Nadia Kajouji and encouraging or counseling her to commit suicide," and welcomed the judge's ruling as a sign that "sanity is prevailing."

Schadenberg observed that Melchert-Dinkel "is not the only one who is perpetrating these crimes for their own sick gains upon depressed and vulnerable people," and said that the law must deal with internet suicide predators.

"Melchert-Dinkel committed a heinous crime when he took advantage of Kajouji, a depressed first year student at Carlton University, and convinced her that suicide was the best course of action.

"It is the same as pushing a person off a cliff," Schadenberg stated.

Melchert-Dinkel has entered a preliminary plea of not guilty and requested a jury trial. The next court hearing is set for November 19.

Contact: Thaddeus M. Baklinski

Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: November 10, 2010

Pro-lifers want legislative results

     United States Capital

As federal funding for abortion was a campaign issue leading up to the recent midterm elections, a pro-life group thinks it is time for the winners to deliver on their promise to block the use of tax dollars for that purpose.
 
Many pro-life women and men won federal office during the elections earlier this month, while some of those who professed to be pro-life, but voted for ObamaCare's federal funding of abortion, lost their positions. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, decides that "large numbers of representatives learned the consequences of their vote for taxpayer funding of abortion in the healthcare bill when they were thrown out of office by the constituents they betrayed."

Former Colorado Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave, who headed the "Votes Have Consequences" campaign for the SBA List, recognizes that her group "had great success," but she says it is now time to claim "some legislative victory."

She explains that the SBA List has two legislative priorities. The first is to see the passage of H.R. 5939, which is also known as the No Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Act. That will make the Hyde Amendment permanent and repeal abortion funding in ObamaCare. According to Musgrave, this effort is being "championed" in Congress by "authentic" pro-life Democrat Dan Lipinski of Illinois, who is joined by Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ) and 160 other sponsors.

 A second critical bill is the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, which is sponsored by Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN). That measure would stop tax dollars from going to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider.

So while elected officials are working for the passage of these bills, the SBA List spokesperson is encouraging concerned citizens to express their pro-life suggestions at StopAbortionFunding.com.

Contact: Charlie Butts

Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: November 11, 2010

Pro-Life President Bush's Interview with Matt Lauer


     President George W. Bush
 
When you've had great pro-life Presidents, it reminds you (a) the distance between them and pro-abortion President Barack Obama, and (b) of how much they did for the cause of life.

President George W. Bush was a great credit to our Movement, and stood tall when others would have folded. He has a new book out, "Decision Points," which I will begin reading tonight.

But like many of you, I saw his interview with NBC's Matt Lauer in which he talked for the first time about the miscarriage his mother suffered when Bush was only a teenager.

Bush tells us that he had asked his mother for permission to include what Lauer describes aptly as a poignant story" in the book, and would not have without Barbara Bush's agreement. Lauer notes it would be "impossible not to draw parallels between that moment when you said that was a little brother or sister and your views on life and when it begins."

"No question that it affected me, my philosophy, that we should respect life, Mr. Bush responds. "I was a prolife president."

The following are the paragraphs in the book that deal with this, courtesy of ABC News website, with a word of attribution or two added by ABC's Susan Donaldson James.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"One day, shortly after I learned to drive and while dad was away on a business trip, Mother called me in to her bedroom," he writes. "There was an urgency in her voice. She told me to drive her to the hospital immediately. I asked her what was wrong, She said she would tell me in the car.

"As I pulled out of the driveway, she told me to drive steadily and avoid bumps. Then she said she had just had a miscarriage. I was taken aback. This was a subject I never expected to be discussing with Mother. I also never expected to see the remains of a fetus, which she had saved in a jar to bring to the hospital. I remember thinking: There was a human life, a little brother or sister.

"Mother checked herself in to the hospital and was taken to an exam room. I paced up and down the hallway to steady my nerves. After I passed an older woman several times, she said, 'Don't worry honey, your wife will be just fine.'

"When I was allowed into Mother's room, the doctor said she would be all right, but she needed to spend the night. I told mother what the woman had said to me in the hall. She laughed one of her great strong laughs and I went home feeling much better."

The next day, when the future president picked her up, she thanked him for being so "careful and responsible." His mother also told him not to tell anyone about the miscarriage, which she felt was a "private family matter."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let me make two points. First, after the Lauer interview Mr. Bush told ABC News, "I had no intention of creating a national dialogue [on miscarriages]." Yet just by scanning the Internet, you learn that it is clear that his recollection initiated a lot of conversation about just how intensely personal and tragic the unintentional loss of baby can be.

Second, even though Mr. Bush said the primary point of relaying the story in his book was to "help the reader understand why my mother and I are so close," it tells us a lot about him and has wider application to the rest of us.

We can more perfectly understand the beauty and complexity of preborn children through ultrasound. Elsewhere in the book, Mr. Bush writes,

"When I saw [his twin daughters] Barbara and Jenna on the sonogram for the first time, there was no doubt in my mind that they were distinct and alive."

But in a miscarriage we are also reminded how fragile the unborn child is.

In both cases, the lesson is the same one drawn by President Bush in the very next sentence:

"The fact that they could not speak for themselves only enhanced society's duty to defend them."

Contact: Dave Andrusko

Source: NRLC
Publish Date: November 10, 2010

November 10, 2010

A Post Mortem of Illinois Elections


     Governor Pat Quinn

Some rambling thoughts on why we had minimal gains in Illinois, while there was a major landslide across the nation. The first thought that comes to mind is that the Democrats and their allies like Personal PAC framed the candidates. One has to ask why did the candidates allow that to happen? After all, Personal PAC has been sending nasty mailers in elections for many years. This year was no different. The Republican candidate for Governor was framed as a women hater, one that would even put abortive women in jail. After all, he voted against a mammogram bill that would save women's lives. Probably, worst of all, he didn't like equal pay for equal work. Even a rookie working a campaign knows those were all lies. No abortive woman would ever be put in jail. That is not what the pro-life movement is all about. There's already federal and state laws on the books that mandate equal pay for equal work. As far as mammograms, the vote was not against women, it was simply a vote not to require all insurance companies to cover this procedure. The vote was against government mandates, not women. So, that being said, why didn't the campaign frame the response to Personal PAC's attack.

On the other hand, did the pro-life movement as a whole counter Personal PAC's accusations? Personal PAC has been the cause of many conservative candidates losses. Surely the candidates and the movement can counter some of these anticipated accusations before they are made. In other words, did we fail to frame the issue, thereby allowing the other side to frame the issue?

As a pro-life movement, have we educated enough? The answer is clear. If a majority of women believe Personal PAC's accusations, the answer is obviously no. The next question comes to mind. What more could we do and why don't people know the truth? I personally don't think the pro-life movement has made Illinois a Democratic state. The voters made it a Democratic state and they hide behind misinformation from various sources, rather than seeking the truth.

How about the shepherds across denominational lines - where was the teaching on the sanctity of human life? Where was the teaching on the moral responsibility to vote and to inform ones conscience on the moral issues before voting? If I was a visitor from outer space visiting some churches, I might think they were a Democratic stronghold, rather than a house of God.

In Lake County Illinois, there are 404,637 registered voters, however, only 205,507 voted, that's 50.86% of voters in each precinct. You have to be kidding! That is no way to be an American. So, who's to blame. You tell me.

Source: Lake County Right to Life
Publish Date: November 9, 2010

IVF highly ineffective, study reports


    In vitro fertilization (IVF)

In vitro fertilization (IVF) -- regarded by some as a potential cure-all for infertile couples but controversial among some pro-lifers -- is a highly ineffective process, according to research reported by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM).

Based on a study of IVF treatments from 2004-08, researchers with the Shady Grove Fertility Center in Maryland found the following results:

-- 192,991 eggs were retrieved in 14,324 IVF cycles;

-- 110,939 of the eggs were successfully fertilized;

-- Only 44,282 proceeded to develop into viable embryos.

-- Only 8,366 babies will be born from these embryos, and that is based on the premise that all the frozen embryos will be utilized.

As a result, only 7.5 percent of the eggs that are fertilized become children born alive, ASRM reported Oct. 26.

Contact:
Tom Strode
Source: Baptist Press
Publish Date: November 9, 2010

Assisted suicide for couples promoted


    Swiss euthanasia promoter Ludwig Minelli

Swiss euthanasia promoter Ludwig Minelli is calling for lethal prescriptions to be provided legally to the spouses and partners of terminally ill patients even when they are healthy.

"A change in the law is required to give dementia sufferers and their families more opportunities," said Minelli, founder of the euthanasia clinic Dignitas in Zurich, according to a report in the Daily Mail in London. "The partner should be allowed to have a prescription for these drugs even when they are not terminally ill.

"In such cases the partners are often a similar age and one does not want to remain without the other," Minelli said.

Assisted suicide is "a marvelous possibility given to a human being," he said, according to the Daily Mail report Oct. 19.

Zurich public prosecutor Andreas Brunner said of Minelli's recommendation, "In my view, no change in the law should be sought."

Switzerland allows physician-assisted suicide for those with a terminal illness. Dignitas has become known internationally as a destination for those from other countries seeking aid in killing themselves. Euthanasia and assisted suicide are legal in Belgium, Luxembourg and The Netherlands.

Assisted suicide involves a doctor prescribing but not administering the lethal drugs. In euthanasia, a physician administers the fatal dose.

Contact:
Tom Strode
Source: Baptist Press
Publish Date: November 9, 2010

Post-Abortive Women Report Continuing Distress Years Later


     Menopausal woman

A small but fascinating study examines the feelings of menopausal women about their long-ago abortions, which occurred an average of 24 years earlier. British researchers extensively interviewed eight women about their experiences and published the results in the October 20 Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology.

 "The work provides an insight into the very long-term consequences of this procedure for these participants," wrote Kathryn Dykes of Greater Manchester West Mental Health National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Pauline Slade of the University of Sheffield, and Annette Haywood of the NHS in Sheffield. "It is likely that women may benefit from the availability of post-[abortion] counselling services not necessarily just in the immediate aftermath, but at different points after the procedure."

The researchers asked women participating in a menopause clinic to volunteer for the study. The eight women who agreed were interviewed for an average of one hour and asked detailed questions about their abortion experience and their feelings at the time and into the present.

The interviews demonstrated several common themes experienced by the post-abortive women. These included a predominantly negative long-term emotional impact, the fear of judgment, greater inner strength and compassion for others, and the attempt to avoid thoughts about the abortion but being unable to forget it.

The authors found that some women suffered from "cognitive dissonance," a psychological conflict that occurs when the person has two strong opposing feelings. "Women reported knowing that the [abortion] was 'the right thing to do,' but maintained a negative perspective of the self as 'bad' or 'guilty,'" they wrote.

"This explains the inconsistency in some women's self-perceptions, for example split into 'good mother/person' and 'bad person who had [an abortion]' and apparent inability to integrate these opposing views. The justification and contradiction themes illustrate that memories have been 'blocked out' to such a degree that inconsistency remains unresolved."

The impact of menopause--the ending of a woman's childbearing years--on attitudes toward prior abortion experiences was also a focus of the research. While most of the woman denied a direct association between menopause and thoughts about the abortion, the time of life did cause many to rethink the choices they made when younger and characterized their abortion as a "loss" that caused vulnerability and stress.

The authors included many quotes from the women, identified only by their first names, that illustrate the conflicting feelings that they are experiencing as they grow older. "I wish I'd had the baby now, but my life's a lot happier," said Jenny. "I felt guilty, I thought some people could look at me and see that I were guilty, that I'd done something wrong … sometimes I wish I could not feel this, weight in my chest and this guilt that I feel," Elaine told the researchers.

Tina described her attempts to forget the abortion and the negative feelings, but admitted that it is impossible. "Blocking them out and trying to get through things, doesn't work always and you don't realise how deep they are until you realise … they have sort of like had a knock-on effect in your life," she said.

Some of the women went on to have more children, although others never did give birth. They all reported a sense of wistfulness and regret as time went on.

"I could have had a daughter or a son, a little granddaughter, that's blood, you know, that's my own," said Barbara. Jenny said, "I've always thought of him … wondering how old he'd be, I do wonder about that child."

Ann, who did not have more children, said she feels that her childless state is a consequence of her abortion. "I know it sounds a bit stupid but I feel as if it's like, is this my judgement? It's like, it's as if this is my punishment [no more children]," she said. Ann added, "It's haunted me to be honest, I'm ashamed, I think it's just something else I have to hate myself about."

The authors call for more research into the long-term impact of abortion. Even decades after an abortion women are suffering psychological harm, and this fact needs to be supported by further study that takes into account their individual experiences. "It is likely that emotional response to [abortion] is complex and more in-depth and detailed understandings may be gained through using qualitative approaches which explore and reflect women's experiences in their own words, rather than in response to predetermined concepts and categories measured by questionnaires," they wrote. "Sound qualitative studies, within a UK setting, are required to fully understand any longer-term impact of living with a history of [abortion]."

Contact:
Liz Townsend
Source: NRLC
Publish Date: November 9, 2010

Euthanasia advocates don't look past the suffering to see the person, says disabled leader



     Patient in the Hospital

Alison Davis, the co-ordinator of No Less Human, a group within SPUC defending the right to life of the disabled, wrote a very powerful letter published recently in The Herald. Click here to read her letter in full on The Herald website, but I leave you with some key quotes, which speak for themselves:

"Mary Warnock [JS: the pro-euthanasia philosopher] makes a fundamental mistake when she suggests that so long as a bill legalising euthanasia/assisted suicide has sufficient "safeguards", sick and disabled people need not worry that they will be first in the line of candidates for the lethal dose."

"Would the Warnocks of this world agree to add a waiting time – 10 or 20 years – to any bill they draw up, in case of a change of mind? Because human beings are fallible, because life can be good even with great pain, because nobody knows when doctors' prognoses will be wrong, it is sheer folly to legalise assisted suicide for one group of people because they suffer in certain ways, while spending large amounts of money on "suicide prevention programmes" to prevent the suicides of others who suffer in a different way."

"Mary Warnock's mistake is that she seems unable to look past the suffering to see the person, a sad affliction indeed."

Contact: John Smeaton
Source: SPUC
Publish Date: November 10, 2010

Assisted suicide ad preys on fearful and abandoned, opponent says



     Alex Schadenberg / Dr. Philip Nitschke
    
Alex Schadenberg / Dr. Philip Nitschke
 
The prospect of a television ad promoting assisted suicide is causing a stir in New Zealand. One anti-euthanasia advocate is arguing that the doctor behind the ad is preying on the depressed and the mentally troubled.

Dr. Philip Nitschke, based in Australia, is an advocate for assisted suicide in the U.S., Canada, Ireland, the U.K., Australia and New Zealand. Last month in Canada he held a seminar at the First Unitarian Church of Toronto for about 50 people, giving them information on how to commit suicide.

Alex Schadenberg, international chairman of the Ontario-based Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, said Nitschke has been on an international tour to promote his "suicide manual" and to explain how people may circumvent the law if they assist in a suicide.

He characterized the doctor as a "suicide predator" who searches for people and encourages or counsels them to commit suicide.

"The predator is not concerned about the frame of mind of the person, they are only concerned with the fact that this person has expressed some interest in death," Schadenberg told CNA.

He compared Nitschke to William Melchert-Dinkel, a man being prosecuted in Minnesota after he allegedly used fake identities to establish relationships with the depressed and suicidal and then encouraged them to commit suicide.

Nitschke's advocacy has also drawn criticism in New Zealand, whose Commercial Approvals Bureau recently approved the screening of an advertisement by Nitschke which promotes assisted suicide.

Right to Life New Zealand expressed disappointment in the decision, asking that Television New Zealand uphold "the common good" and promote "a culture of life" by assuring the public that the 45-second suicide video will not be screened.

The group said it would be inconsistent for the state-owned broadcaster to show a video promoting suicide while also spending millions of dollars on suicide prevention programs.

"There are on average about 500 suicides reported each year in New Zealand. Suicides have a profound effect on families and whole communities. The screening of Dr. Nitschke's suicide video would be socially irresponsible and could result in an increase of suicides," Right to Life New Zealand said.

"The prevailing community attitude towards suicide is that it is unacceptable behavior, promotes a culture of death, is contrary to the common good and is destructive of the social fabric," the group added.

It argued that the broadcast violates rules against ads which support violent behavior and which lack due social responsibility to society.

"Suicide or self murder is in itself the ultimate in violence against oneself, it is unacceptable to the community," Right to Life New Zealand said.

Noting that Nitschke cites the principle of freedom of speech to protect himself from criticism and legal action, Schadenberg said that freedom of speech has limits.

"These kind of actions are not only irresponsible, but they are dangerous to vulnerable people," the anti-euthanasia advocate told CNA.

Schadenberg also characterized legalized assisted suicide as "the ultimate form of elder abuse." He questioned whether the elderly will ask for assisted suicide under pressure from relatives.

He also warned that legally required psychological assessments for those who request suicide in Oregon – where assisted suicide is legal - are not taking place.

"People who are planning to kill themselves or be involved with killing another are often going through depression, mental breakdown or experiencing a life-changing challenge, like few others. These are people who, without the necessary support, are not freely choosing to die, but rather dying out of a sense of fear, last resort or abandonment."

Contact:
Kevin J. Jones
Source: CNA
Publish Date: November 10, 2010