October 19, 2010

Majority of Illinoisans prolife, Simon Institute finds in survey



    The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute

The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute found in a poll taken September 30 to October 10 that an overwhelming majority of the 1000 registered voters surveyed were decidedly prolife.

Less than 1 in 3 are in favor of unrestricted abortions, the press release says, and 2 out of 3 supported limiting abortions either some of the time or in all situations:

There were 31.5 percent who said abortions should be legal in all circumstances, 19.1 percent who said they should be illegal in all circumstances and 45 percent who said they should be legal only in certain situations. There were 4.4 percent who said they didn't know.

Other topics such as capital punishment and gay marriage were also discussed in the poll.  56 percent favored continuing the moratoriam on executions and only 28 percent disapproved of civil unions.

Click here for the fulll press release.

Click here for the poll results.

Source: Illinois Review
Publish Date: October 28

Planned Parenthood Admits Defeat: No Abortion as a Human Right in UN Summit Document



    Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe

Pro-life and pro-family advocates have scored two major political victories in the same month in two different international organizations. Following the defeat of the McCafferty Report – which attempted to abolish the rights of European doctors to refuse to commit abortions – at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, pro-life advocates are now declaring a victory over the International Planned Parenthood Federation at the UN.

Carmen Barroso, regional director of International Planned Parenthood Federation for the Western Hemisphere Region, recently complained to pro-abortion lobbyists that a UN Summit Outcome Document "neglects any reference to safe abortion, comprehensive sexuality education ... indicating that there is still much work to be done."

The Outcome Document was officially adopted by the General Assembly on the 22nd of September.

Pro-abortion NGOs had been pushing during the September Summit for the adoption of a report that was described by pro-life advocates as an "extreme" and "ideologically driven" effort to establish abortion as a "universal human right" for the purposes of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

The report by Navanethem Pillay, the UN's High Commissioner on Human Rights, and endorsed by the Secretary General, proposed that the MDGs should include abortion as a human right under MDG number five, which calls on governments to "improve maternal health." The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, (SPUC) issued a worldwide alert in June urging pro-life people around the world to contact their relevant government officials to stop the adoption of the report at the UN's Summit in September.

Pat Buckley, SPUC's chief lobbyist at the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva, said at that time that the report's promoters were "blatantly ignoring any evidence which disputes its conclusions and deliberately avoiding debate." SPUC described the progress of the report through the debate process as "carefully stage-managed" in which the Holy See and SPUC, the only pro-life NGO present at the June Session, "were excluded from making an intervention," despite a call from the High Commissioner for submissions from interested parties.

In its presentation prepared for the Geneva meeting, SPUC denounced the report as promoting an agenda "advocated by groups with a history of the racist and eugenic ideology, which is inconsistent with genuine human rights." While promoting the liberalization of abortion laws, the report "largely ignored" means of improving maternal mortality rates such as improving access to antibiotics, drugs to prevent hemorrhage, blood transfusions, clean facilities and properly trained health professionals.

SPUC challenged the assertion by the abortion lobby that liberalization of abortion law improves maternal survival rates. They cited the experience of Poland, where legal restrictions were placed on abortion in 1993 and maternal mortality has dropped by 82 per cent in the last 20 years.

Contact: Hilary White
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: October 18, 2010

Moms Who Chose Life Over Abortion Become Activists on Capitol Hill



    Danica Fountain (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)

On a recent summer afternoon, Danica Fountain was spending time with her eight-year-old daughter, Aaliyah Sanchez, but the pair was not relaxing at home or shopping at a nearby mall. Fountain and her daughter were on Capitol Hill lobbying members of Congress about the work done by pregnancy resource centers across the nation.

The visit came in the wake of the release of a report by NARAL Pro-Choice America's California affiliate that accuses pregnancy resource centers of convincing women not to have an abortion by apparently using inaccurate medical information and untrained volunteers who use intimidation techniques. (NARAL was formerly called the National Abortion Rights Action League and, originally, the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws.)

"I really didn't realize how much people do not know about pregnancy centers," Fountain told CNSNews.com. "And now that they are under attack, I really do want the senators and members of Congress to know the truth and to continue to support them."

"There are so many women out there who are making the decision to abort because they don't know there are other options and no one is supporting them with those other options," said Fountain, who considered aborting her daughter because of the pressures of an unplanned pregnancy.

The NARAL report, "Unmasking Fake Clinics: The Truth About Crisis Pregnancy Centers in California," is the fourth released by the abortion advocacy group in recent years. NARAL previously published reports in three other states: Maryland (February 2008), Texas (July 2009) and Virginia (January 2010).

In the latest report, NARAL claims to have investigated 32 of the approximately 200 pregnancy resource centers in California by having unpaid volunteers visit or telephone the centers for advice on their "unplanned pregnancy."

Fountain recalls distinctly her first visit to a pregnancy resource center near the home where she lived with her grandparents in Arizona. She was 18 and had just graduated from high school.

"I remembered driving by this house several times before and seeing the free pregnancy test sign," Fountain told CNSNews.com. "So I went there so that no one could see me and I wouldn't have to hide tests when I got home."

Fountain told the woman at the center that if she was pregnant, she planned to get an abortion.

"She was so nice," Fountain said. "She did not judge me at all."

The woman asked Fountain if she would consider options other than abortion and if she wanted to see the developmental stages of the fetus in the first trimester.

"She showed me a picture of this baby that had arms and legs and a head," Fountain said. "I couldn't believe it because everyone referred to that as 'tissue,' that it was not a baby, which is why I was comfortable going through with an abortion."

"I was shocked" by the picture, Fountain said.

Still, she believed abortion was the only option for an unmarried 18-year-old with only a high school education and no livelihood. Fountain's boyfriend wanted her to have an abortion and even a trusted relative convinced her it was the only option if she wanted to go to college and achieve other goals she had, such as dancing professionally and traveling around the world.

So Fountain and her relative went to a Planned Parenthood clinic where she was advised in the waiting room as she spoke to a receptionist.

"Everyone in the room heard everything we were talking about," Fountain said. "I was ashamed. I didn't want everyone to know why I was there."

The receptionist informed Fountain that the longer she waited, the more expensive an abortion would be, and the receptionist did not talk to her about adoption or parenting before the abortion was scheduled.

"That was it," Fountain said. "I had a card with a date and a time, and that's how we left."

Fountain remembered that the woman at the pregnancy resource center said she could come back anytime she wanted to talk about alternatives to abortion.

"I went back for the ultrasound, and I saw her heart beating," Fountain said of her unborn daughter, Aaliyah. "That made it so real to me, that it wasn't just tissue.

"It wasn't something they could get rid of, that it was a baby," Fountain said.

Today, Fountain's daughter is a happy and beautiful child who was very aware of why she was in the nation's capital with her mom and other parents and children who credit pregnancy resource centers for not only saving the life of their child, but for their own well-being.

"She knows how much I love her, and she thanks me for keeping her," Fountain said.

     Nikki Payne and her son (CNSNews.com/Penny Starr)

Nikki Payne also joined Heartbeat International's annual "Babies Go to Congress" event on Capitol Hill in July. Payne juggled a stroller, diaper bag, and her active toddler son, Zuri, as she marched up and down the halls to visit members of Congress.

Heartbeat International is an umbrella organization that serves 1,100 affiliated pregnancy help centers.

Payne said she was 19 and not in a relationship when she became pregnant. She decided that rather than confide in family and friends, she would just get an abortion on her own.

"I was worried about the judgment of family and friends because of the goals I had in mind," Payne told CNSNews.com. "So I tried to make the decision to terminate my pregnancy alone without anyone knowing."

She described her visit to Planned Parenthood as an "awful experience."

"It was very impersonal and very robotic, and I didn't feel right," Payne said. In contrast, she said that when she visited the pregnancy resource center in the city where she lived in Virginia, a counselor spent several hours talking to her about alternatives to abortion.

"So it's just a huge turnaround from going somewhere where I was just a number to actually wanting to inform me so I could make an informed decision and know the repercussions or the rewards of the decision I was going to make," Payne said.

As she held her wiggly son in her arms, she said she could not imagine having made the decision to go through with an abortion.

"It's not possible to see him not in my life," Payne said. "They gave me an ultrasound, which made everything so clear – that Zuri is going to be that blessing in my life."

"And there is no way I could choose whether he lives or dies," Payne said. "It's not my place to choose to take a life away."

Melinda Delahoyde, president of Care Net, which oversees a network of more than 1,000 pregnancy resource centers around the United States, said that NARAL's attempts to discredit the work that centers do through these kind of reports, and also in court cases it has brought against centers, actually can work in their favor when people hear the stories of women like Fountain and Payne.

"When we go in front of state legislators and tell what we do, it's not working to [NARAL's] good," Delahoyde said. "It works for our good because they hear from women themselves.

"We have a chance to educate the media, community leaders, public health officials – everyone who is there in that room," Delahoyde said. "Here are the stories from women. Here is what actually happens: what do pregnancy centers do and how we're connected in our local communities.

"That this isn't some big, top down, nationalized thing," Delahoyde said. "This is people in their local community, working with other people in their community to help women who need it."

"That is what it is all about," she said. "And when that story comes out, it works to our benefit."

Contact: Penny Starr
Source: CNSNews.com
Publish Date: October 18, 2010

Why It's Absurd to Deny Obama's Healthcare Bill Contains Abortion Funding



    President Obama's Signature on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

With the decision of the Ohio Elections Commission to allow a hearing  to decide whether the Susan B. Anthony List has falsely represented the voting record of Rep. Steve Driehaus (D-OH), the question is again raised: Was abortion funding authorized by the health care legislation signed into law by President Barack Obama?

The complaint arose from the SBA List's use of billboards declaring that Representative Driehaus of Ohio's 1st Congressional District had voted for taxpayer-funded abortions by voting for the health care bill. If Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA, is found guilty, she could go to jail. Supporting Driehaus's effort to imprison Dannenfelser are James Salt, policy director of Catholics United, and Kristen Day, president of Democrats for Life of America.

Driehaus, by the way, had made essentially the same characterization of the health care legislation as made by Dannenfelser. On March 19, Driehaus was an original co-sponsor of H. Con. Res. 254, an "enrollment correction," introduced by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI). That resolution would have removed abortion funding from the Senate version of the health care bill.

The language of the final health care bill -- "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" (PPACA) -- had not changed when both Stupak and Driehaus voted for it and Obama signed it into law. Now, Driehaus is trying to send Marjorie Dannenfelser to jail for precisely the same view of the health care bill as expressed in his support for H. Con. Res 254 -- that it authorizes federal tax dollars to be spent on abortion.

Three members of the Ohio Elections Commission voted 2-1 to find "probable cause" to send the Driehaus complaint to a full hearing of the seven commissioners. The date has not yet been set.

The evidence supporting the SBA List is undeniable. In addition to the witness of Driehaus himself (and Stupak), there are the multiple provisions of the legislation itself that authorize the funding of abortions. The best summary is found in the affidavit submitted for last week's meeting of the Ohio Elections Commission by Douglas Johnson, legislative director of National Right to Life.

As Johnson points out in his affidavit, the provisions of the Senate version of the bill, ultimately signed into law, contained many of the same abortion funding mechanisms that the Stupak-Pitts amendment of the House bill removed. (There were new, additional problems in the Senate bill.) Stupak, Driehaus, and all those who supported the Stupak-Pitts amendment in the House had full knowledge that those provisions had not been removed. Driehaus and Stupak also knew of a similar amendment, offered by Sens. Ben Nelson (D-NE) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT), which was defeated soundly in the Senate. Interestingly enough, when the Senate bill passed (without removing the abortion authorizations), Stupak and Driehaus, along with Kristen Day, fought hard against its passage in the House. They worked diligently from the time Congress returned in January until March 19th when their objections suddenly, and inexplicably, vanished.

Here, Johnson provides an overview of the abortion funding in the 906 pages of PPACA:

    It contained multiple provisions that authorize new programs or expand authorizations for existing programs that are authorized to cover abortion, either explicitly or implicitly. Some of these provisions are entirely untouched by any limitation on abortion in existing law or in the PPACA itself, and others are subject only to limitations that are temporary or contingent.

Those who deny this characterization must have been surprised when three states -- Pennsylvania, New Mexico, and Maryland -- began the implementation of Section 1101 (42 U.S.C. § 18001) creating the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP), also known as the "high-risk pool" program. Abortion coverage was explicitly included by these three states in this $5 billion program that provides coverage for up to 400,000 people.

After National Right to Life publicized the abortion coverage, it was determined that the coverage was not excluded either by the president's executive order or the Hyde Amendment. On July 14, the Department of Health and Human Services released a statement:

    Abortions will not be covered in the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) except in the cases of rape or incest, or where the life of the woman would be endangered.

Nothing in the HHS statement suggested that abortion funding contradicted anything in the executive order, the PPACA, or any pre-existing law, including the Hyde Amendment. In other words, the implementation of PCIP by these three states to include abortion funding had been authorized.

Johnson's affidavit provides three other examples of abortion authorization in the PPACA, and even these are not exhaustive. In addition to the program of pre-existing conditions, there are federal subsidies for private health plans that cover elective abortions, authorization for abortion funding through Community Health Centers, and authorization for inclusion of abortion coverage in health plans administered by the federal Office of Personnel Management.

Defenders of the bill say that under the premium subsidy program only private money will be utilized to pay for abortions. This is merely an accounting trick that still violates the Hyde Amendment. But there is a much bigger problem: The bill states that on the same day the Hyde Amendment is no longer attached to HHS appropriations, federal dollars may be used to fund abortions. This is an explicit authorization of abortion funding, which creates a huge incentive for Congress to put an end to the Hyde Amendment.

Johnson argues that any one of these four examples is sufficient to prove the SBA List was not falsely representing Driehaus's voting record.

The biggest issue with the legislation, according to Johnson, is not the individual provisions authorizing taxpayer funded abortions, but "the absence of any bill-wide restriction on federal funding of abortion." In other words, what's missing is the very amendment offered to the House bill by Stupak, and co-sponsored by Driehaus -- the amendment that never became a part of the final legislation.

Those who point to the protections of the Hyde Amendment or the president's executive order, as does Driehaus, ignore the fact that they were already found inapplicable to abortion coverage in the PCIP. Hyde protections, which must be renewed annually by Congress, are limited to funds appropriated to HHS by the annual appropriations bill, and the health-care legislation contains many new authorizations and direct appropriations entirely unrelated to the restrictions of the Hyde Amendment.

Let's be clear: Those who look at the evidence of abortion funding in the healthcare bill and still demur need to ask themselves if they want to remain guilty of the same political partisanship they so often attribute to others.

Contact: Deal Hudson
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: October 18, 2010
Click here to return to the Current Daily News

Silence - the sound of the aborted


    Pro-life Day of Silent Solidarity

It's Pro-Life Solidarity Day at many schools throughout the world -- and there's a special objective in the observance.

Today marks the seventh year that students are taking a vow of silence and distributing literature about abortion and letting babies live. Bryan Kemper, who heads Stand True Ministries, notes that 4,000 babies per day die from abortion in America -- and that participation in Pro-Life Solidarity Day is widespread.
 
"Last year we had students from over 4,000 campuses in 25 countries participate in this event," he shares. "And we heard back from at least 80 girls who cancelled abortions on one single day."
 
Bryan Kemper (Stand True Ministries)Kemper notes some notable examples. "One [participating] student who walked into her classroom...ended up talking to her teacher, and the teacher confessed to her that she was going to have an abortion the next day," he recalls. "This student was able to talk her own teacher out of having an abortion and help save that teacher's child's life."
 
Another student's mother confessed to her daughter that she was going to have an abortion the next day, and the result was saving her own sibling's life.
 
Kemper stresses students are not rebelling through silence, but just making a lifesaving point.

Contact: Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: October 19, 2010

Pro-Life Display at La Crosse University Vandalized



        Crosses commemorating the unborn at La Crosse University

After placing more than 1,100 crosses on display Sunday night, the Pro-Life Students of La Crosse this morning found their Cemetery of the Innocence Display on campus in piles.
 
A slew of pro-abortion signs were found on the fence close to the vandalized Cemetery, which is erected annually by pro-life students.

Alyssa Gebel, president of the UW-L Pro-Life Students of La Crosse, told the student newspaper The Racquet that she held little hope of finding the vandals. "The chances of finding whoever did it are slim to none," she said.

The group reported the incident to the Office of Student Life and University Police, and filed a hate incident report with the Office of Campus Climate, according to the newspaper. Assistant Dean of Students John Palmer said the incident was in the hands of University Police and that the Office of Student Life will "take action and will hold [the vandals] responsible." Palmer called the vandalism "completely inappropriate."

Students for Life of America issued a statement of support for the Pro-Life Students of La Crosse Monday, and thanked the school's administration for their swift response with an investigation. SFLA hopes the Administration will bring the vandals to justice.

"Vandalizing the Cemetery of the Innocence not only shows a lack of respect for property, but also for the students of the University," said SFLA executive director Kristan Hawkins. "It is a sad day when there can no longer be an open academic discussion on a university campus, but rather vandalism and hate."

Contact: Kathleen Gilbert
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: October 18, 2010

October 18, 2010

Abstinence America Founder Challenges Parents



    Abstinence Education

Mike Goss, President and founder of Abstinence America, is challenging parents to recognize the power they have to influence their children and to use that influence to help kids avoid the devastating consequences of early sexual experimentation. Goss has spent the last seven years talking to more than 30,000 young people about character, responsibility, relationship intelligence and smart sexual choices. Now he is speaking to their parents. He is launching a new program called Sex-Ed for Parents.

Goss says, "If we are going to change these numbers, - 900,000 teen pregnancies and six million cases of sexually transmitted disease -- parents must be equipped, motivated and ready to engage kids in meaningful dialogue about sex."

Research demonstrates that when it comes to sex, kids still rely most heavily on the advice of their parents, but unfortunately many parents don't know where to start, what to say or how to communicate effectively with kids. That's where Goss comes in. He sees his role as a trusted delegate coming along side to guide and educate, but acknowledging the parents' role as the primary authority.

Sex-EdforParents.org. is a video web blog that offers parents a free membership where they can receive videos and an e-newsletter with up-to-date news in the world of adolescent sexuality as well as age appropriate resources to help jumpstart the conversation with kids from elementary age through college.

Goss will soon be introducing another revolutionary communications resource . "This is a whole new approach to sexuality education and it surpasses anything that has been done before," says Goss. Parents who are looking for help will now have an extraordinary resource."

Mike Goss has talked to more than 30,000 students in the last seven years, teaching them to make smart sexual choices. Abstinence America, a non-profit corporation, has been established as the undisputed leader in the Houston Metropolitan area in character-based sex education. Students have written Mike over 1,000 letters validating the impact of his work.

Contact: Mike Goss
Source: Abstinence America
Publish Date: October 18, 2010
--
Illinois Federation for Right to Life
2600 State Street, Ste E.
Alton, IL 62002

Phone: 618-466-4122
Fax: 618-466-4134

Web: www.ifrl.org
E-mail: mail@ifrl.org

Susan Boyle: Docs Told Mum to Abort Me



   
International singing phenomenon Susan Boyle

International singing phenomenon Susan Boyle has revealed in a new autobiography that doctors had told her mother to abort her, because they thought the pregnancy was risky.

Boyle soared to stardom in April 2009 after appearing on the UK television program, Britain’s Got Talent, when the plain-looking Scotswoman shocked audiences with a powerful rendition of “I Dreamed a Dream” from the musical version of Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables.

But the 49-year-old native of Blackburn, a village in West Lothian, Scotland would never have dreamed the dream of singing on the international stage, if her mother had agreed to abort her on the advice of doctors.
 
In her autobiography, The Woman I Was Born To Be, Boyle reveals that doctors recommended a “termination” to Bridget Boyle, who already was a mother of eight children, because they feared physical complications.

Boyle reveals that her mother rejected this advice as “unthinkable” since she was a “devout Catholic.”

When Boyle was born by emergency c-section, doctors did not tell her mother the usual “Congratulations, Mrs. Boyle! A beautiful baby girl.” Boyle wrote that doctors took a dismissive view of her life – especially when they suspected brain damage due to oxygen deprivation.

 “‘It’s probably best to accept Susan will never be anything,” Boyle recounted the doctors telling her mother. “‘Susan will never come to anything so don’t expect too much of her.’”

“I’m sure they had the best of intentions,” Boyle continued, “but I don’t think they should have said that, because nobody can foretell the future.”

“What they didn’t know was that I am a bit of a fighter, and I’ve been trying all my life to prove them wrong.”

Boyle released her first album “I Dreamed a Dream” on November 23, 2009, and quickly sold 9 million copies in six weeks, making it the number one selling album for that year. The Guinness Book of World Records also recognized Boyle as the number one female artist in the UK with the fastest selling debut album.

In recent years, a number of popular icons have revealed that they had mothers who were faced with the choice to abort or give birth.

Andrea Bocelli, Italian pop, opera, and classical singer, revealed to the world this year that doctors recommended abortion to his mother after she experienced an attack of appendicitis, making it likely that her son would be born with a disability. Bocelli is completely blind.

Bocelli said he hoped that the story of his brave mother “could encourage many mothers that find themselves in difficult situations in those moments when life is complicated, but want to save the life of their baby.” (see coverage)

In the United States, college football star Tim Tebow (now back-up quarterback for the Denver Broncos) revealed that doctors recommended abortion to his mother after she became sick in the Philippines.

Tebow’s story was featured in a brief 30-second ad spot purchased for the Super Bowl. According to one study, 92.6 million Americans watched the ad. Of those who identified themselves as supportive of abortion, four percent said they were led to "personally reconsider [their] opinion about abortion" after watching Tebow and his mother Pam tell their story in the ad.

Contact: Peter J. Smith
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: October 15, 2010
--
Illinois Federation for Right to Life
2600 State Street, Ste E.
Alton, IL 62002

Phone: 618-466-4122
Fax: 618-466-4134

Web: www.ifrl.org
E-mail: mail@ifrl.org

Pro-Life Victory: KS Supreme Court Allows Planned Parenthood Criminal Case to Go Forward



    The Kansas Supreme Court

The Kansas Supreme Court ruled today that the mammoth 107-count criminal case against Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri may move forward and remanded the case back down to the Johnson County District Attorney's Office for prosecution.

"This is a huge victory for the cause of life," said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman, whose group has worked for years to bring Planned Parenthood to justice. "Now it is up to the Johnson County District Attorney to do the right thing and prosecute Planned Parenthood to the fullest in the interest of justice and in the interest of public safety."

The charges were filed in 2007 by then-District Attorney Phill Kline, who had investigated Planned Parenthood and George Tiller for illegal late-term abortions during his tenure as State Attorney General. The charges came just four months after Kline's successor, Paul Morrison, sent Planned Parenthood a letter absolving them of any wrong-doing. However, Judge Richard Anderson, who oversaw Kline's investigation was troubled by the evidence and noted that he believed that Morrison should never had sent such a letter. Morrison was later forced to resign amid a sex and abortion corruption scandal where he tried to use his illicit lover to spy on Kline's abortion investigations for the purpose of obstructing them.

The case has been tied up in the Kansas Supreme Court for nearly two years while the court decided whether to allow sealed evidence and witnesses against Planned Parenthood should be allowed to be used in prosecuting the group on charges of illegal late-term abortions then lying to cover it up.

Operation Rescue pressed hard in support of the charges with a series of radio spots, e-mail campaigns, a petition drive, and through a citizen-called grand jury.

"This case has been marred by continued delay and political corruption that has caused public confidence in the system to be diminished. In the interest of justice and closure of the people of Kansas, this case must go to trial. Anything less will only reinforce the belief that political corruption is alive and well in the State of Kansas," said Newman. "Let both sides make their arguments and let a jury decided based on the evidence. That is the American way."

Click here to view the KS Supreme Court Decision.

Contact: Troy Newman
Source: Operation Rescue
Publish Date: October 15, 2010
--
Illinois Federation for Right to Life
2600 State Street, Ste E.
Alton, IL 62002

Phone: 618-466-4122
Fax: 618-466-4134

Web: www.ifrl.org
E-mail: mail@ifrl.org

A day of silence, solidarity for the unborn



    7th         annual Pro-life Day of Silent Solidarity

As students from around the world plan to participate in the 7th annual Pro-life Day of Silent Solidarity, the upcoming event is bringing about hopes that this year's initiative will see a greater response than last year.

Tomorrow, students in thousands of schools across the country and throughout the world will wear a red band around their arms and a piece of tape across their mouths to demonstrate their pro-life stance. Bryan Kemper, president of Stand True Ministries and founder of the event, recalls the life-changing effects of last year. In one instance, a girl who went to school with the "life" tape across her mouth made an impact on one of her teachers.

Bryan Kemper (Stand True Ministries)"Her teacher looked at her really upset and was like, 'what do you think you're doing,'" Kemper shares. "And so the girl decided to break her silence and talk to her teacher because of the look in her teacher's eye. Sure enough, her teacher said, 'I'm supposed to have an abortion this week,' [but she] broke down and canceled her abortion because of that student."

Meanwhile, another girl wearing the "life" tape walked down the stairs in her own home. She met up with her mother, who ended up "breaking down and confessing that she was going to have an abortion later that week." The Stand True Ministries founder points out that "this girl was able to save the life of her own sibling simply by participating."

He reports that students from more than 4,000 campuses and 25 countries participated in last year's Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity, and at least 80 young women reportedly canceled their abortions on that one day. Kemper is encouraging more students to take a stand for life and join this year's initiative.

Contact: Bill Bumpas
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: October 18, 2010
--
Illinois Federation for Right to Life
2600 State Street, Ste E.
Alton, IL 62002

Phone: 618-466-4122
Fax: 618-466-4134

Web: www.ifrl.org
E-mail: mail@ifrl.org

Landmark Pro-Life Law Goes into Effect in Nebraska



    Fetal-pain law that bans abortions         after 20 weeks is in effect in Nebraska.

A landmark fetal-pain law that bans abortions after 20 weeks went into effect today in Nebraska.

The Legislature passed it in April.

According to scientific studies, preborn children have pain receptors throughout their bodies and nerves linking them to the brain at and after 20 weeks.

Mary Spaulding Balch, National Right to Life director of state legislation, said the law shows there’s a state interest in the lives of preborn children.

“Nebraska’s law sets the course for the nation,” she said. “In a groundbreaking and life-affirming step by the Nebraska Legislature, 20-week-old pain-capable unborn children will finally be protected in law. We look forward to consideration of similar legislation in other states during the spring legislative session.”

Bolstered by passage of the law, Sen. Mike Johanna (R-Neb.) recently introduced the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act in the U.S. Senate. The bill requires that a woman seeking an abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy be informed that her preborn child may feel pain during an abortion and be offered anesthesia if she goes forward with the abortion.

Source: CitizenLink
Publish Date: October 18, 2010
Click here to return to the Current Daily News
--
Illinois Federation for Right to Life
2600 State Street, Ste E.
Alton, IL 62002

Phone: 618-466-4122
Fax: 618-466-4134

Web: www.ifrl.org
E-mail: mail@ifrl.org

Brigham's NJ license suspended...for now



    The office of American Women's Services,         owned by Dr. Steven Chase Brigham, is located in this building         at 1 Alpha Ave in Voorhees, N.J.

Steven Brigham An East Coast abortionist plans to appeal the suspension of his only remaining medical license.

Steven Chase Brigham has told the New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners he has broken no laws, so he is appealing the board's decision to an administrative law judge.

One major issue, which the board deemed "facially unbelievable," is that Brigham would begin late-term abortions in New Jersey, where he was licensed, but he would ferry the patients to Maryland for completion of the procedure. His attorney argued that the initial steps taken in New Jersey were part of preparation, not the procedure, and he maintained that the split-state method was more "economical" for the patients because Maryland has more permissive laws. A big problem, however, is that Brigham is not licensed to practice there.

Marie Tasy (NJRTL)"His starting the procedure in New Jersey really did not constitute an abortion and that New Jersey had no jurisdiction over other states and their laws dealing with abortion," Marie Tasy of New Jersey Right to Life (NJRTL) tells of the abortionist's argument.

But regulators call his actions "manipulative" and "deceptive," and they consider him to be an imminent danger to the public. So both sides are now preparing for the appeal. Tasy's group is "hoping that the attorney general office has a very strong case, [which] they appear to, and that this administrative law judge sees things differently" and upholds the board's decision.

She adds that even though Brigham's license has been suspended or revoked in several states, he has been operating up to 15 abortion clinics and can continue to do so as long as he does not practice medicine.

Contact: Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: October 18, 2010
--
Illinois Federation for Right to Life
2600 State Street, Ste E.
Alton, IL 62002

Phone: 618-466-4122
Fax: 618-466-4134

Web: www.ifrl.org
E-mail: mail@ifrl.org

October 15, 2010

Federal contraception mandate wouldn't help women, physician and researcher says

    Dr. Thomas Hilgers

Planned Parenthood and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) began a new joint effort this week to lobby the Department of Health and Human Services to make free contraception a part of new federal requirements for all hospitals. In response Dr. Thomas Hilgers, an expert in women's health and family planning methods, stated that the plan would not help women, nor promote public health as contraception advocates claim.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has already rejected efforts to mandate contraceptive coverage, saying it would violate the religious rights of Catholic hospitals and doctors. On October 14, Dr. Hilgers wrote to CNA from Omaha, Nebraska (where he directs treatment and research at the Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction) to explain the plan's inherent problems from a scientific and medical standpoint.

As part of her effort to convince the HHS to accept her proposal, Planned Parenthood's president Cecile Richards argued women would not have to "pay $50 for birth control pills anymore" if her idea became law.

But Dr. Hilgers said Richards' accounting ignores the real price women pay, when fertility is regarded as a sickness needing "preventive care." He noted that prominent side effects of the pill include circulatory problems, breast cancer, cervical cancer and liver tumors, and warned there were "many others beyond this as well."

Hilgers also disputed remarks by the ACOG's Vice President for Practice Activities Hal Lawrence, who claimed that contraceptive care leads to "healthier pregnancies."

"Nothing could be further from the truth," Hilgers wrote. "Once a woman discontinues oral contraceptives, the 'time to pregnancy' is longer than it would be if they were not on oral contraceptives. This is a form of infertility induced by the birth control pill."

Hilgers, who is the Clinical Professor of Obstetrics and Gyneconology at Creighton University, said he knew of "no evidence at all that suggests that the birth control pill leads to 'healthier pregnancies'."

He also warned that promotion of contraception, particularly by the federal government, cannot be considered a "middle ground in the abortion wars," as one research consultant to Planned Parenthood has called it.

Most popular methods of contraception, he explained, actually cause the abortion of a new and genetically distinct human life. Hilgers said that consistent advocates of the pro-life position should instead consider recent advances in natural family planning, including his own NaProTechnology.

"The oral contraceptive (pill) has basically three mechanisms of action," he explained. "It inhibits ovulation, blocks the cervical mucus and renders the lining of the uterus hostile to an early implanting blastocyst. The latter is an abortifacient effect," he stated, saying that scientists do not yet know how frequently oral contraceptives cause this form of abortion. He went on to mention that "the intrauterine device is associated with early abortions as well."

Dr. Hilgers additionally observed that the spread of contraception, and the attendant separation of sex from reproduction, had not improved public health or social stability at the national level. 

Instead, he said, artificial contraception had been verified by sociologists as "the main ingredient to the increase in the divorce rate" beginning in 1962, and a primary factor behind the current "epidemic of sexually-transmitted diseases."

Source: CNA/EWTN News
Publish Date: October 15, 2010
Click here to return to the Current Daily News

Doctors Treat First Patient with Embryo-Derived Stem Cells

    A California-based corporation has announced it has enrolled the first patient to undergo therapy using embryo-derived stem cells

A California-based corporation has announced it has enrolled the first patient to undergo therapy using embryo-derived stem cells, after overcoming federal officials' concerns over the dangers of injecting humans with the potentially cancer-causing cells.

The embryo-derived cells, known as oligodendrocyte progenitor cells or GRNOPC1, are being injected into the patient primarily to "assess the safety and tolerability of GRNOPC1" in patients with severe spinal cord injury, not to cure them. The patient is being treated at Atlanta's Shepherd Center, a spinal cord and brain injury rehabilitation hospital and research center.

Thomas B. Okarma, Ph.D., M.D., Geron's president and CEO, called the start of the trial "a milestone for the field of human embryonic stem cell-based therapies." He noted that, "When we started working with hESCs in 1999, many predicted that it would be a number of decades before a cell therapy would be approved for human clinical trials."

Although Geron Corp.'s clinical trial has been in the works for years, the Food and Drug Administration's reticence to inject the dangerous material in humans has delayed its inception. Geron announced in May 2008 that its clinical trial was put on hold by the FDA. In January 2009, the government greenlighted the project, but then backpedaled in October after it was revealed that mice injected with the embryo-derived cells had developed cysts. The trial was finally re-approved in August 2010.

The cancerous potential of the cells was not a surprise: a 2006 study released by researchers at the University of Rochester Research Medical Center in New York found that embryonic stem cells injected into rats showed signs of forming cancerous cells. Similarly, stem cells taken from aborted children have proven vastly uncontrollable and prone to tumors in many cases.

Meanwhile, induced pluripotent adult stem cells have proven much more stable, paving the way to dozens of treatments and even cures of previously intractable conditions such as Alzheimer's, juvenile diabetes, and multiple sclerosis. Embryo-derived stem cell treatments have produced no practicable treatments to date.

Although adult stem cell therapies have already provided promising results for individuals with old spinal cord injuries, Geron's embryo-derived treatment will only be tested on individuals with injuries less than fourteen days old. In addition, experts note that the patients will need to take immunosuppressive drugs to keep their bodies from rejecting the foreign material - a burdensome requirement entirely bypassed by adult stem cell treatments.

David Prentice of Family Research Council recently pointed out that, contrary to what the media is reporting, "Geron is not injecting growing embryonic stem cells into a patient," but rather "cells made from embryonic stem cells." He also observed that, "Of note is that now, a year and a half after approval, Geron has finally listed their experiment, the only approved embryonic stem cell trial, at ClinicalTrials.gov." However, by way of contrast, "As of this writing, there were 2,002 adult stem cell trials in patients listed." But, "Despite the overwhelming success of adult stem cells for patients, few have heard the good news."

Federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, unleashed by President Obama in March 2009, is now under court scrutiny after a D.C. federal judge ruled in August that taxpayer funding for the embryo-destructive research violated a U.S. law known as the Dickey-Wicker amendment.

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth also issued a temporary injunction against the funding, but that was overturned in an appeals court ruling the following month. 

Contact: Kathleen Gilbert
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: October 14, 2010

Ride focuses on perils of abortion



    Pro-Life Freedom Ride

The second Pro-Life Freedom Ride, patterned after the civil rights freedom rides of the 1960s, is being launched today.
 
During the first Pro-Life Freedom Ride for the unborn from Birmingham to Atlanta (July 23-24, 2010), more people participated than all of those who took part in all of the freedom rides combined during the civil rights movement 50 years ago. Father Frank Pavone of Priests for Life says the next one, launched today in Tennessee, will travel from Knoxville to a special memorial in Chattanooga.
 
"It is the National Memorial for the Unborn," he says. "And in that facility one can see little gold plates placed on the wall which bear the inscriptions written by the moms and dads and other relatives of children who were lost to abortion."
 
Pavone says the gathering at that memorial on Saturday will provide a time for reflection, meditation, prayer, and healing for those who have faced the ramifications of abortion. But it is also a place of hope, says the pro-life activist.
 
"Men and women of the Silent No More Awareness Campaign, who share their testimonies after abortion, will be there and will give their testimony at that Chattanooga service," he explains.
 
Pavone sees a lot of excitement and energy in participation in the pro-life movement, largely because of educating the public over the past several years on the harm of abortion, but also due to awareness of the genocide that abortion represents on African Americans and other minorities.

Contact: Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: October 15, 2010
Click here to return to the Current Daily News

Abortion on demand in California?

    Medical procedure

California officials are hoping to solve the state's economic crisis with a new budget plan, but one industry is wreaking havoc on the state's economy.
 
Carol Hogan, communications director for the California Catholic Conference, reports that abortion is an industry in California and that the state provides the procedure on demand. She says individuals in the state can have an abortion whenever and wherever, compliments of taxpayers.

"You can have an abortion if you want it; there [are] no restrictions," Hogan explains. "You can have it anytime during the pregnancy; you can have as many in a year as you want. If you can't afford it, we'll pay for it."

She points out that California spent $23 million in 2007 on 80,000 abortions in MediCal. Even though she knows the California Catholic Conference cannot overturn state law on the procedure, her group is working to inform Californian voters on the issue.

"This is an education project right now. We can't legally stop the funding of abortion because of that California Supreme Court decision, but we can educate Californians that their tax money is paying for abortions," Hogan details. "I don't think a lot of them realize that."

The California Catholic Conference is teaming up with other pro-family organizations to educate voters on this issue.

Contact: Becky Yeh
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: October 15, 2010

Pro-life lobby succeeds at the UN

    UN Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva

International Planned Parenthood Federation, the world's largest abortion promoter, has admitted defeat in its efforts to hijack the millennium development goals in order to promote legalize abortion throughout the world - and unrestricted access to abortions for adolescents.

Earlier this year, Pat Buckley, SPUC's chief lobbyist at the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) in Geneva,launched an appeal to church leaders and pro-life groups worldwide to oppose an extreme, "ideologically driven" pro-abortion report produced by Navanethem Pillay, the High Commissioner on Human Rights, being "bounced through the Human Rights Council. Pat said at the time: 

"This report is being bounced through the United Nations forums, blatantly ignoring any evidence which disputes its conclusions and deliberately avoiding debate. The clear intention of the powers-that be is to use this ideologically-driven report's findings to influence the Millennium Development Goals Review later this year at the UN in New York."

At Pat Buckley's instigation, SPUC issued a worldwide alert in five languages warning that a right to abortion, under the guise of reproductive health, would be proposed at a United Nations (UN) summit in New York between 20 and 22 September 2010 and urging pro-lifers around the world to take action - in particular to contact the most relevant government officials in their countries objecting to the attempts being made to promote abortion under the guise of reproductive health.

May I take this opportunity of thanking all those who took action to defend unborn children and their mothers throughout the world, including our colleagues in other pro-life organizations and courageous delegates from pro-life nations.

Carmen Barroso, regional director of International Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Hemisphere Region, has written to pro-abortion lobbyists saying that the Summit 's Outcome Document ... officially adopted by the General Assembly on the 22nd of September ... neglects any reference to safe abortion, comprehensive sexuality education, adolescents ... indicating that there is still much work to be done." [This language is pro-abortion code for legalized abortion and unrestricted access to abortion for children from 12 upwards.]

Contact: John Smeaton
Source: SPUC
Publish Date: October 15, 2010
Click here to return to the Current Daily News

'Dangerous' conditions not deterring pro-lifers



    Charleston Women's Medical Center

Charges are pending against a Tennessee abortionist in connection with an assault incident in Charleston, South Carolina.
 
Troy Newman of Operation Rescue explains that 62-year-old Gary Boyle flies into South Carolina from Tennessee to perform abortions. But following a recent incident outside the Charleston Women's Medical Center, Boyle was arrested for pointing a loaded gun at pro-lifers.
 
"It looks like he was so perturbed by the peaceful, prayerful 40 Days for Life people that were praying in front of the abortion clinic that he operates there that he pulled a gun and pointed this weapon at the peaceful, prayerful pro-lifers," Newman reports. "He was subsequently arrested and booked on aggravated assault in the local jail."
 
The Operation Rescue president finds the increased amount of violence against pro-lifers disturbing.
 
"We'll remember Jim Pouillon that was brutally gunned down and murdered in Michigan just last year, and we've had other incidents," he laments. "I've had weapons pulled on me. Recently, there was another incident in Albuquerque, New Mexico where a man threatened to shoot some pro-lifers out there. So it's becoming increasingly dangerous."
 
But even in the face of that danger, Newman says the pro-life advocates he knows will not be deterred because they are prayerfully working to rescue unborn children who are sentenced to die.
 
While the pro-life battle field is becoming increasingly dangerous, advocates in Rockford, Illinois, who thought they were about to reach a settlement with the city, will most likely finish their case in federal court because of the lack of protection the city provides for them. 
 
Rockford is the home of the Northern Illinois Women's Center, one of the most notorious abortion clinics in the state. The owner is known for hassling and threatening pro-lifers by taking measures like approaching them with a chainsaw, hanging rubber chickens by the neck in the window and posting anti-Christian slogans. One pro-lifer was actually attacked by a supporter of the clinic.

Tom Brechja, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Society, reports that a federal civil rights lawsuit was filed against the city two-and-a-half years ago.

"We thought we were on the way to settling, and the judge even presided in a number of conferences in chambers. And suddenly, they changed their tune," he explains. "We're not sure exactly why or what led to it, [but] we think there's probably a civil war going on within the Rockford city government."

Brechja feels the pro-lifers have been as patient as possible with the city.

"Just the other day, we were in court and we're back on the war path," he laments. "We've staked out a schedule for hostilities, and we're going to proceed in earnest to enforce our claims and win complete relief, we trust, against the city in federal court."

Pro-lifers simply want the law enforced and their constitutional rights protected, but the city may now have to pay damages.

Contact: Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow
Publish Date: October 15, 2010
Click here to return to the Current Daily News

October 14, 2010

The abortion nurse's daughter: Inside minds at the mill



    Abortion Mill

I have always been intrigued with the psyche of abortion workers and asked Abigail Seidman extensively about this.

Recall when Abigail was 13 years old her mother began pulling her from school every Friday to volunteer as what pro-lifers call a "deathscort," someone who escorts mothers planning to abort from the parking lot, shielding them from pro-life sidewalk counselors attempting to engage them in conversation or provide written information.

So Abigail saw a lot as a semi-insider. I can only imagine how traumatized she must have been not only because she experienced all this as an adolescent and teenager but also as a closet pro-lifer.

Let me begin by saying this was 15 years ago. Since then the Toledo, Ohio, abortion clinic where Abigail's mother worked has moved to a new location, although it is still owned by the same woman, a Wiccan when Abigail knew her. Abigail's mother has also moved on, so I don't know if the nefarious practices and conditions Abigail observed are ongoing.

I asked Abigail if the clinic aborted women who weren't pregnant. Yes, she said, adding the clinic owner often joked "anyone who wants an abortion can have one, whether she's pregnant or not!"

I asked Abigail if due dates were ever adjusted. I recall the hospital where I worked admitted a mother for an abortion for fetal anomalies at 27 and sixth-sevenths weeks' gestation, according to her last menstrual period (LMP). But the attending physician charted that according to ultrasound she was only 23 weeks along, coincidentally the upper age limit allowed for abortions. The baby was born (alive) weighing two-and-a-half pounds, clearly as old as the LMP indicated.

Abigail witnessed similar scenarios. Since her clinic was only allowed to abort up to 16 weeks, due dates were either dialed down with the help of the mother, encouraged to "re-imagine" the date of her LMP. Or dates were manipulated by staff, who told the mother LMP dating was unreliable because women can skip periods or have spotting they don't realize is a period.

"I don't remember a woman ever being turned away because she was too advanced in her pregnancy," Abigail wrote me. "The latest date I ever heard was 28 weeks, although women were always told their date was 16 weeks or less."

What did staff think of aborting mothers? "They called them 'stupid sluts' if it wasn't their first abortion, or 'brood mares' if they chose life and left before aborting," wrote Abigail.

There was one particular scandal Abigail recalled of a clinic worker who accidentally got pregnant but decided against abortion.

"There was first the ideological issue," Abby explained. "The accepted belief was that all unplanned pregnancies were 'unwanted' by default and should be aborted. So the clinic owner insisted the philosophically correct thing to do was abort the 'unwanted' baby and then get pregnant again intentionally to have a 'planned, wanted' baby."

The pregnant staffer reminded the owner that included in the word "pro-choice" was "choice." The issue then became what effect would a visibly pregnant worker have on patients? Would more of them choose life, causing the clinic to lose money? The owner ultimately had no legal "choice" but to keep the pregnant worker, who refused to take a leave of absence.

When I was lobbying for pro-life bills at the Illinois capital in the early 2000s, the ACLU lobbyist became pregnant. I couldn't understand how she could testify for the culture of death while at the same time feeling preborn life inside her.

Pregnant pro-aborts obviously develop a mental schism. Abigail observed this with the pregnant clinic worker. "She appeared not to mind upsetting patients," Abigail wrote me, "and she also appeared to delight in tormenting pro-lifers."

The latter she would do by daily flashing her pregnant belly at sidewalk counselors, crowing, "Today's the day! I'm having an abortion!"

She didn't, of course, but continued to facilitate abortions after her daughter was born, bringing her to work so she could breast-feed. "I was charged with babysitting, upstairs in the clinic library," Abigail wrote, "a job I relished, since it kept me away from the drama out on the sidewalk and also meant I got to cuddle and play with a baby, which I loved, even though my mother disapproved!"

It was during this time Abigail's pro-life views were cemented not only by caring for the baby but also by reading "hostile" pro-life books in the library.

"There was a sort of delicious irony in reading pro-life books and caring for a baby in an abortion mill," Abigail wrote me. "I remember thinking, 'This is what I want my life to be someday.' Praise God, that wish has come true!"

Abigail and her husband are parents to two beautiful boys

Contact: Jill Stanek
Source: WorldNetDaily
Publish Date: October 13, 2010

Dem Candidate Charges SBA List with Criminally Misleading Ads: NRLC Responds



    Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List)

The National Right to Life Committee is stepping up to the plate to defend a national pro-life political action committee that has been charged by a pro-life Democrat with criminally misleading voters about his vote in favor of the national health care law sought by President Barack Obama.

U.S. Rep. Steve Driehaus, the incumbent Democrat in Ohio's 1st District, filed a criminal complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission against the Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List), charging that the PAC's claim that he voted for taxpayer funded abortion in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is "factually untrue."

Driehaus is taking a beating in the polls to pro-life GOP candidate Steve Chabot, who is endorsed by SBA-List and leads the incumbent congressman by 12 points. Adding insult to injury, national Democrats have given up on Driehaus's campaign and are reallocating money to races they think they can save from the coming GOP surge in November.
 
The Commission is set to hear oral arguments for both sides Thursday morning at 8:30 in Columbus, Ohio. If the commission finds that the SBA List violated Ohio law by publishing "a false statement concerning the voting record of a candidate or public official," then it becomes a criminal matter with penalties ranging from a five thousand dollar fine to six months in jail.

Democrats for Life and Catholics United have both submitted affidavits for Driehaus claiming that the federal health care legislation does not fund abortion.

But the NRLC has intervened on the side of SBA List with a sworn affidavit detailing precisely why the national health care reform law actually does allow federal subsidies for elective abortions.
"It is outrageous the Ohio law allows an incumbent politician, like Steve Driehaus, to  haul citizens before an appointed government tribunal, under threat of potential criminal prosecution, for expressing an opinion about the public policy implications of a vote that he cast in Congress," said NRLC's Federal Legislative Director Douglas Johnson.

In the 23-page affidavit, prepared and sworn to by Johnson, NRLC argues against Driehaus's claims in 65 detailed and numbered paragraphs that the Affordable Care Act "does not permit and in fact prohibits taxpayer-funded abortions."

NRLC counters that the PPACA actually contains "multiple provisions that do in fact authorize (i.e., create legal authority for) taxpayer funding of abortion, and that predictably will result in such funding in the future" unless the law is either repealed or fixed along the lines of the Stupak-Pitts Amendment.

The affidavit also discusses four specific programs where the PPACA authorizes abortion or where abortion would become funded if Congress failed to renew the annual Hyde Amendment. NRLC points to problems surrounding the Pre-existing Condition Insurance Programs (PCIPs), the program of federal tax-based subsidies to purchase private health plans, the appropriation of $7 billion in new funding for Community Health Centers, and the section creating "multi-state" health plans to be administered by the federal Office of Personnel Management, to name a few examples.
"There are no directives in the Order that apply to all, or even to most, of the provisions of the PPACA," said Johnson, who pointed out President Obama's executive order obtained by Stupak has such an "extremely narrow and highly qualified" scope that even the president of Planned Parenthood called it "a symbolic gesture."

The NRLC affidavit has 16 documents attached as exhibits, including a legal analysis of the health law's abortion provisions performed by attorneys for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, documentation proving state PCIP plans for Pennsylvania and New Mexico covered elective abortions when they were first approved by the U.S. Health Department, as well as a Congressional Research Service report that stated nothing in the PPACA or Obama's Executive Order actually prevented funds for PCIPs from paying for elective abortions.

"In America, anyone should be free to express their views on the effects of the bills that Mr. Driehaus voted for, without fear of criminal prosecution or fines," said Johnson. "Mr. Driehaus enjoys full freedom to dispute his critics, with the voters as the ultimate judges about whose claims are most credible."

Click here for the NRLC affidavit and documents submitted as supporting evidence to the Ohio Election Commission.
 
Contact: Peter J. Smith
Source: LifeSiteNews.com
Publish Date: October 13, 2010