May 17, 2012

Pro-Life Federal Lawmakers Challenge Policy of Legal Abortion Until Birth in Our Nation's Capital!

     

 
Today, in the nation's capital, the District of Columbia, there is no limit whatever on abortion.   It is legal to the very moment of birth.
 
No more than five nations in the world have a legal policy that is this extreme.
 
Today, at 4 PM EDT, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution will hold a hearing on an NRLC-backed bill that would protect unborn children in the District after they have reached 20 weeks fetal age -- the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803).
 
To read a general Media Advisory issued by NRLC on this hearing and the legislation, click here.  Below, we provide some more detailed background information that you may find useful, and guidance on how you can help pass this vtal legislation.
 
The reason that abortion is legal to the moment of birth in the federal capital is that a body known as the "District Council," which operates on authority delegated by Congress, completely repealed the local abortion law.  But the responsibility for changing that rests entirely with the Congress -- and the President.  Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution provides that Congress shall "exercise exclusive jurisdiction in all cases whatsoever, over such District . . ."
 
H.R. 3803 was introduced by Congressman Trent Franks (R-Az.), who is also the chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution.  The bill is based on an NRLC-model bill, first developed in 2010 and already enacted in six states.  In the bill, Congress adopts "findings" (declarations of fact) that by 20 weeks after fertilization (if not earlier), the unborn child has the capacity to experience great pain.  The bill then prohibits abortion after that point, except when an acute physical condition endangers the life of the mother.
 
Now that the extreme abortion policy in the District has been brought to the attention of Congress, the issue boils down to this:  Any lawmaker who does not approve of unlimited legal abortion until the moment of birth would be well advised to vote for this bill.  A vote against H.R. 3803 will be scored by NRLC as a vote to ratify a policy of unlimited legal abortion until the moment of birth.  On this issue, no Member of Congress can shift responsibility to any other political body -- Article I of the Constitution makes it crystal clear that the responsibility rests entirely with Congress -- and the President.
 
 
This debate is not about symbolism, but brutal reality.  Not far from the White House, an abortion clinic sells abortions on request (credit cards or cash only) up to 24 weeks fetal age (which is 26 weeks in the "LMP" ob-gyn dating system, counting from the last menstrual period, about the beginning of the sixth month), by the "D&E" dismemberment method, which involves tearing off the baby's arms and legs by brute force.  The method is depicted in a medical illustration posted on our website here.  It will also be graphically described at today's hearing by Dr. Anthony Levatino, who at one time performed many such abortions.
 
Ironically, in the District of Columbia (as in many jurisdictions), there are severe penalties in place for cruelty to animals.  Under Section 22-1001 of the District's criminal code, a prison sentence of up to 5 years is possible for cruelty to a cat, dog, guinea pig, or other animal (defined to include "all living and sentient creatures (human beings excepted)."
 
The hearing will begin at 4 PM Eastern Daylight Time.  You can watch the hearing on the internet on the Judiciary Committee website at http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/Hearings%202012/hear_05172012_2.html
 
Testifying at today's hearing will be Dr. Anthony Levatino, an obstetrician-gynecologist who at one time performed many D&E abortions but who now opposes abortion; Dr. Colleen Malloy, a neonatologist from Northwestern University who will testify regarding the pain perception capacities of babies who are born very prematurely; and Dr. Byron Calhoun, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at West Virginia University specializing in maternal and fetal medicine, who will testify regarding humane medical approaches to cases in which an unborn child is diagnosed with a genetic disorder or other serious medical condition.  Also testifying will be an opponent of the bill, Christy Zink of Washington, D.C., who had an abortion after learning that her unborn son had a malformed brain.  The written statements submitted by the witnesses will be available on the Judiciary Committee website (and on the NRLC website), but to see the question and answer portions of the hearing, you will have to watch the video, either during the live feed or after the fact.
 
The Constitution Subcommittee will not vote on H.R. 3803 today.  Instead, the full House Judiciary Committee will hold a voting session (called a "markup") on the bill on a future date that has not yet been announced.
 
The progress of H.R. 3803 to the House floor may be enhanced if the bill obtains 218 cosponsors (a majority of House members).  Currently the official list of House cosponsors stands at 194.  Please check the list of cosponsors, arranged by state, on the NRLC website here.  If any House member from your area has not yet cosponsored, please telephone his Washington, D.C., and in-district offices to urge that he or she promptly do so.
 
To reach the easy-to-use e-mail tool on the NRLC website, which will allow you to rapidly send suggested messages to your federal representative(s) by e-mail, please click here.
 
NRLC does not regard its House scorecard for the 112th Congress as being complete until the House has voted on H.R. 3803  -- but any House member may "vote early," so to speak, by cosponsoring the bill.  Once the committees have completed work on the bill, however, additional cosponsors may no longer be added.
 
The NRLC website contains much documentation on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act and on the scientific evidence that unborn children, by 20 weeks if not before, have the capacity to experience great pain, here.
 
To read NRLC's latest letter to House members on this bill, click here.
 
Identical legislation (S. 2103) has been introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah).  A list of current cosponsors is here.

Take Action Now!

Source: National Right to Life

May 14, 2012

NRLC Letter to Congress on the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803)

     

The District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803)

Dear Member of Congress:

Did you know that in our nation's capital, it is perfectly legal to subject unborn children to terribly painful deaths, even during the sixth and seventh months of pregnancy -- or even later? In the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal at any point up to the moment of birth, for any reason, as long as someone is willing to pay an abortionist for the gruesome "service."

This appalling situation will be explored by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution on May 17, 2012, in a public hearing on the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R. 3803). This legislation, introduced by Congressman Trent Franks, is similar to laws that have already been enacted in six states (Nebraska, Kansas, Idaho, Oklahoma, Alabama, and Georgia). The National Right to Life Committee (NRLC), which is the nationwide federation of state right-to-life organizations, urges you to join 186 of your colleagues as a cosponsor of this bill, if you have not already done so. This bill is NRLC's top congressional priority for 2012.

Our nation was created when the original group of sovereign states came together and formed a federated republic. Article I of the U.S. Constitution established that the national seat of government would be placed forever not within any state, but in a special Federal District -- and that the Congress would "exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District." But what would the Framers of our Constitution say if they returned today and learned, to their horror, that well-developed unborn babies are legally being put to death, in terrible pain, virtually within the shadow of the U.S. Capitol and the White House?

One abortion "clinic," situated not far from the National Mall and the White House, openly advertises abortion on demand up to the beginning of the seventh month of pregnancy -- payable by a credit card. ("Checks and money orders are not accepted.") This facility mentions the method used for its late abortions -- "dilatation and evacuation," also known as "dilation and evacuation" or "D&E." In a D&E, the abortionist grasps the little arms and legs of the well-developed unborn baby and literally tears them off, one by one, by brute manual force. The baby is alive, of course, at the beginning of this dismemberment abortion. A medical illustration of this common, brutal abortion method is posted here: http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/DEabortiongraphic.html

The baby certainly experiences excruciating pain as her limbs are twisted off with steel forceps. Some of the extensive evidence that unborn children have the capacity to experience pain, at least by 20 weeks, is available on the NRLC website at http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/Fetal_Pain/index.html

Who can put a stop to this? The Congress, and -- if he would -- the President.

In H.R. 3803, Congress would declare that at least by 20 weeks after fertilization, an unborn child has the capacity to experience pain -- and, on that basis, the bill would prohibit abortions within the District (except when acute physical problems endanger the life of the mother) from that point on (from the beginning of the sixth month, in layperson's terminology). By cosponsoring this bill, you would express your opposition to the current policy of unrestricted legal abortion to the moment of birth in the nation's capital. Those who vote against the bill will, of course, be voting to ratify that exact policy. The Constitution leaves no doubt that with respect to protection of innocent human life in the federal District, "the buck stops" with Congress.

Thank you for considering our urgent request that you add your name as a cosponsor of H.R. 3803, if you have not already done so.

Source: National Right to Life

May 11, 2012

News Links for May 11th

      

Victory for pro-family forces at UN

Legatus files suit to block contraceptive mandate

Bishops publish blessing for unborn child

Promiscuity declines among US high school students

Whistleblower Says Texas Abortionist is Breaking New Ultrasound Law

Secret Public Records of Non-Physician Abortion Project Demanded

Fr. Pavone Welcomes News of Latest Lawsuit Against HHS Mandate

Fr. Frank Pavone Statement on Guilty Plea of Man Who Threatened Him and Other Pro-Life Leaders

Post Abortive Woman Responds to War on Women

AZ defunding of P. Parenthood continues trend

California Senator Pulls Abortion-Expansion Bill

Missouri Seeks Protections for Pregnancy Resource Centers

Judge: TX can't cut funds to Planned Parenthood

Arizona says NO to Planned Parenthood

Idaho RU-486 case watched closely

Film awarded for 'subtle' pro-life message

Dems reject 'radical' move against women

The many problems of SB 1338

More businesses against ObamaCare

Crucial pro-life bill on the line in Miss.

Dold to Defend Planned Parenthood, Illicit Sex Programs and Abortion

      

Planned Parenthood is up to another round of embarrassing, taxpayer-funded high jinks -

Washington state college students are getting high-tech condoms in a social media experiment by Planned Parenthood. In a bizarre promotion of "safe sex" bragging social media posts, students received specially packaged condoms, which included a special QR code. The codes can be scanned by smart phones, allowing the participants to "check-in" their sex activities on the website, www.WhereDidYouWearIt.com. The various locations of the "safe" sexual activity are then posted on an area map.

And the same day comes word that Illinois Congressman Bob Dold (IL-10) is planning a press conference Wednesday to do what?  Defend and stand with Planned Parenthood. Really?

"In response to the growing number of efforts to discriminate against and exclude organizations like Planned Parenthood from participating in health care programs, Dold's legislation would protect the inclusion of any hospital or health care entity that seeks to participate in the Title X family planning program," his office said in a release.

We thought Dold was a moderate on promoting abortion and illicit sex.  At least that what conservatives in his district were led to believe. Terribly disappointing, Rep. Dold.

His DC office number is 202 224 4835 and his defense of Planned Parenthood is inexcusable.

Source: Illinois Review

Federal Court: Texas Must Resume Funding Planned Parenthood

     

After three court rulings within the space of a week, a three-judge panel from the 5 th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that Texas must continue using taxpayer dollars to fund Planned Parenthood as a lawsuit continues.

Planned Parenthood is suing the state over a law passed in 2011 which says no organizations affiliated with abortion sellers will receive public funds. Because some Planned Parenthood clinics in Texas don't perform abortions, the group claims it is constitutionally entitled to a share of the Medicaid funds that fuel Texas' Women's Health.

A week ago, U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel agreed with Planned Parenthood and issued an injunction that restored funding.

But one day later, Judge Jerry E. Smith, a judge on the 5th Circuit, granted a temporary halt of the injunction, allowing the state to enforce the law and stop the funding. But Smith also asked Planned Parenthood to submit its written arguments against the granting of the temporary stay. It did so later that same day.

Then on Friday, a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit — including Smith — revoked the stay. That restored funding under Yeakel's injunction pending the circuit court's more in-depth review of Yeakel's decision.

The appeals court is expected to hear the state's appeal of district court injunction on June 4.

Marilyn Musgrave, vice president of government affairs for the Susan B. Anthony List, questioned Planned Parenthood's pursuit of public funds when it has more than $1 billion in assets.

"You have to wonder about the wisdom of this standoff between Planned Parenthood and the American taxpayer," she said.

In addition to the lawsuit Planned Parenthood is waging, the Obama administration pulled $30 million in annual federal funding to the Texas program over the new law. The current funding covers the program through November.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has vowed to find a way to continue the women's health program without the federal funds. But it appears state officials are willing to end the program if they are required to make payments to abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood.

"The state of Texas is under no obligation to provide taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood, which accounts for less than 2 percent of the more than 2,500 Women's Health Program providers statewide," Perry's spokeswoman, Catherine Frazier, told reporters in April. "Texas law has been very clear from Day One of this program that abortion providers and their affiliates, like Planned Parenthood, are not qualified providers."

Texas Right to Life agreed."By launching this politically motivated lawsuit against the state of Texas, Planned Parenthood has shown that they are not the champion of women's health they say they are," said Director Elizabeth Graham. "They are clearly willing to throw women's health under the bus to maintain their government funding and further their abortion agenda.

"As far as Planned Parenthood is concerned, if they can't have the money, then nobody can."

Source: CitizenLink

Embryonic stem cell 'success' a lie

     

A British scientist, who has been working in the United States on embryonic stem-cell research, has resigned for fabricating results of his work.
 
Ophthalmologist Peter Francis has received permanent resident status in the U.S. on the basis of the country's interest in clinical researchers. In 2002, while still in Britain, he won the National Research prize for "Best up and coming medical researcher in the U.K.," and as of late, he has been working in Oregon on a pilot experiment funded by two federal grants.

But Dr. David Prentice of the Family Research Council (FRC) says that money was given because of the researcher's fabricated results.

"He puts in a couple of grant proposals to the National Institutes of Health [NIH] where he claims that he's gotten these great results essentially restoring sight to blind rats using embryonic stem cells," Prentice details.

But as it turns out, says the FRC spokesman, Francis never did those experiments; and in fact "he made the whole thing up."

"It came to light this was all a fraud. He decided discretion was the better part of valor and resigned his appointment," the FRC life sciences senior fellow reports. "In the meantime, all the NIH finally agreed to with him was a slap on the wrist. Basically, for the next two years, anything he writes, somebody else has to take a look at to just verify that he actually did an experiment, or so on."

Prentice believes the NIH "really ought to nail" Francis and anyone else who makes up research and commits fraud to get a grant. He also points out that embryonic stem-cell research, which kills a tiny human being, has produced no results. Adult stem cells, however, have produced dramatic and positive results.

Contact: Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow

Attorney: State letting pro-suicide grandmother off easy

       

In one attorney's opinion, an elderly California woman should be prosecuted by the state for selling suicide kits online.
 
Ninety-one-year-old Sharlotte Hydorn of La Mesa has been sentenced to five years of probation for not filing tax returns. She has also been ordered to stop selling her infamous suicide kits that create a suffocation device that uses helium to take away life. The sentence was part of a plea deal reached with federal prosecutors, but Hydorn was not charged in state court for assisting in six suicides.

The 91-year-old made headlines after selling roughly 1,300 suicide kits priced at $40-$60 online under the name of The Gladd company. Hydorn confessed she generated over $66,000 in income and did not pay taxes. She entered the business after her own husband died a painful death from colon cancer. According to The Huffington Post, she says she is doing what she can "to improve the world."

Dana Cody, president and executive director of the Life Legal Defense Foundation, believes the elderly woman should "absolutely be prosecuted by the state."

"Our culture is so pro-death that I'm finding that people just aren't interested in the assisted suicide issue, which is unfortunate," Cody laments. "But definitely, the state should prosecute her under Penal Code Section 401 for felony counts for assisting in individual suicides to the extent that they have evidence to show that people followed through with it."

California Penal Code Section 401 makes it a felony to deliberately aid another in committing suicide. Investigators say Hydorn's kits were sold to at least 50 individuals in San Diego County and were successfully used by at least four people.

Contact: Becky Yeh
Source: OneNewsNow

Unborn babies count in the White House

     

One pro-lifer finds it interesting that pregnant mothers must register their preborn babies before taking a tour of the White House, considering the fact that the current occupant of the White House is pro-abortion.

A recent e-mail newsletter distributed by Ellie Schafer, director of the White House Visitors Office, provides specifics about the information required for an unborn baby visitor, including the child's gender. "Crazy as it may sound, you MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour," Schafer writes.

Given the president's stance on abortion, Douglas Johnson of the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) does not understand this security measure.

Douglas Johnson (NRLC)"We think that it's ironic that President Obama's staff recognizes the existence of unborn babies for purposes of providing security within the White House, and yet there's no indication that President Obama has any problem, for example, with the fact that throughout the District of Columbia, abortion is now legal for any reason up to the moment of birth," he notes.

And since the information has to be updated once the baby is born, the pro-lifer has another question regarding security.

"We think it's notable that the newsletter provides no guidance on what the staff should do if an unborn baby is first registered for security purposes, but then aborted." He wonders, "Do they deregister the child?"

The NRLC spokesman suggests that if the president is concerned about the security of an unborn child inside or outside the White House, he ought to endorse the District of Columbia's Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act when it comes up in a House committee hearing next week. But Johnson adds, "We're not holding our breath for that."

Contact: Charlie Butts
Source: OneNewsNow

NARAL President to Resign

     

In an exclusive interview with the Washington Post's Sarah Kliff released tonight, NARAL President Nancy Keenan announced that she would be stepping down from her post at the end of the year.
 
Kliff writes in her story:
 
In recent years, Keenan has worried about an 'intensity gap' on abortion rights among millennials, which the group considers to be the generation of Americans born between 1980 and 1991. While most young, antiabortion voters see abortion as a crucial political issue, NARAL's own internal research does not find similar passion among abortion-rights supporters.
 
In other words, Nancy Keenan's conclusion is something we have known for years: the post-Roe generations are pro-life – and more passionately so than their parents' generations and their pro-abortion, post-Roe counterparts.
 
We know from Gallup that 61% of the country believes abortion should be illegal in all circumstances or legal only in a few circumstances. We know from Gallup that 45% of the country self-identifies as pro-life. We know from Gallup that 51% of Americans believe abortion is morally wrong. And we know that when those questions are asked of the post­-Roe generation, the numbers tend to skew higher.
 
More important, I know that none of this would even be possible without you and the work you do with National Right to Life and our nationwide network of state affiliates and local chapters. Every day you are educating your communities, touching hearts and changing minds. Every day, you are helping us make a difference for the most defenseless members of our society.
 
Look back to 2003 when the New York Times Magazine quoted David J. Garrow, a hard-core pro-abortion "legal historian" at Emory University, as stating, "There's been so much media attention over the last seven to eight years on partial-birth abortion, we shouldn't be surprised that some of it has had an effect on 12-to-14-year-olds, and it is a public relations coup for the National Right to Life Committee."
 
The other side has noticed. And they're "worried."
 
Contact: Carol Tobias
Source: National Right to Life