December 7, 2020

Pro-Life Research Group Clarifies which COVID Vaccines Use Cells from Aborted Children

The pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute (CLI) has been tracking the development of COVID-19 vaccines since their research phases and has documented their use of aborted fetal cell lines. It recently clarified which vaccine-producers have not used abortion-derived cell lines in their research and production phases.

The institute said last Thursday that it is “encouraging” that “many leading vaccine candidates” funded by the U.S. “do not use abortion-derived cell lines in their production.”

Even those vaccines which are being ethically produced did use fetal cell lines from aborted children during their research phases, however. The two vaccines being considered by the FDA for emergency authorization include one developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, and another developed by Moderna. While neither of these vaccines would use abortion-derived cells in production, tests on both vaccines did involve these ethically-questionable cells.

Three other vaccine candidates, all of which are still in Phase III trials, use aborted fetal cell lines in both production and testing. AstraZeneca with Oxford University, Johnson & Johnson, and Novavax are the developers of these vaccines.

CLI asked developers to use ethical alternatives to human fetal cells when testing and producing their vaccines.

“Many developers already opt to use animal cell lines, non-fetal human cells, yeast, or chicken eggs instead,” the CLI stated. It argued that the ethical alternatives to these cell lines “will reduce vaccine hesitancy for those who oppose the use of fetal cell lines.”

Click here to read more.

December 4, 2020

CDC Releases New Abortion Statistics

The Center for Disease Control (CDC) released its “Abortion Surveillance Report” on Wednesday, Nov. 25. This new report shows statistics for 2018. It continues the steady decline in abortions since 2009 but also shows an increase in abortions between 2017 and 2018.

“While it looks like, in the long-term, abortions are definitely down, there may be a small increase in the number, rate, and ratio of abortions since the CDC’s last full surveillance report in 2016,” said Randall K. O’Bannon, Ph.D., Director of Education and Research for National Right to Life.

These statistics, including the increase, are somewhat misleading. California, New Hampshire, and Maryland refuse to report abortion data to the federal government. DC began reporting abortion statistics to the CDC, but because the District had not reported abortion numbers for 2016 those numbers are not included in this year's report.

The CDC reported that “the total number and rate of reported abortions increased by 1%, and the abortion ratio increased by 2%.” compared to numbers reported in 2017. The CDC also wrote that in 2016, revised FDA guidelines allowed the use of the abortion drug mifepristone as late as 10 weeks in pregnancy. The CDC report noted a 9% increase in the use of mifepristone.

“The use of the chemical abortion method using mifepristone appears to be on the rise in many states, now accounting for about 40% of all abortions in states where the numbers were measured by the CDC,” said Dr. O’Bannon. “The number of chemical abortions might be lower if women were told the truth about the deaths and injuries associated with chemical abortion methods. Instead, the abortion industry peddles lies about the ease of the method and pushes for fewer protections for women undergoing a chemical abortion.”

Live Action News did an analysis of the CDC report which compared the abortion rates of women from different demographics. If you are interested in reading that article, click here. 

Click here to read National Right to Life's coverage.

"Unplanned" Scholarship Helps Single Mom Succeed with Career and Parenthood

Sarah with Ashley Bratcher
photo credit: Lisa Bourne, Pregnancy Help News
A single mom in Iowa recently became the second recipient of the "Unplanned" scholarship, benefitting women who faced unplanned pregnancies and chose life while still pursuing an education.

Sarah, the scholarship recipient, is a single mom of four children who recently finished school for massage therapy. She took out student loans for her education, which the Unplanned Movie Scholarship will help her pay back while still providing for her children.

The Unplanned scholarship was created through a partnership with actress Ashley Bratcher and Heartbeat International. Bratcher, who played the part of former Planned Parenthood clinic director Abby Johnson in the movie "Unplanned," was motivated to create the scholarship after women told her stories of how they felt like they needed to choose between their educations and their child's lives when they became pregnant.

Bratcher presented the scholarship to Sarah in a surprise reveal on Monday.

Sarah had begun the chemical abortion process by taking an abortion pill, but she experienced regret. She received help through the Abortion Pill Rescue Network and successfully reversed the process through abortion pill reversal.

“As a single mom of four kids, no matter what you’re facing, there’s always someone out there who is willing to help,” Sarah said, “who’s willing to pray for you, and who wants to see both you and your baby thrive and survive.”

Click here to read more.

December 3, 2020

Supreme Court Rejects Satanic Temple Case Challenging Missouri Abortion Law

photo credit: Bill Oxford / Unsplash
On Nov. 23, the Satanic Temple's lawsuit against the state of Missouri challenging its 72-hour waiting period law was rejected by the Supreme Court. There were too few Supreme Court Judges who believed that the lower courts' decisions needed to be reviewed, so Missouri's law will stay in place.

The Satanic Temple's 2019 lawsuit claimed that abortion is a key part of their religion's beliefs, and restricting it forced the plaintiff “to act and forgo acting in a manner that violates her belief in The Satanic Tenets as a condition for getting an abortion in Missouri.”

Earlier in the month, the Satanic Temple also attempted to have Justice Barrett forcibly recused from the case, due to her supposed incapability of making an impartial decision in a case related to abortion.

Pro-Life Coach Lou Holtz to Receive Presidential Medal of Freedom

Lou Holtz
screenshot from Republican National Convention speech
The Trump administration announced on Wednesday that the pro-life former football coach Lou Holtz will be awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom today.

“America recognizes Lou Holtz as one of the greatest football coaches of all time for his unmatched accomplishments on the gridiron, but he is also a philanthropist, author, and true American patriot,” states a Dec. 2 White House press release.

Holtz is famous for holding a 100-30-2 record during his 11 seasons of coaching at the University of Notre Dame. His 1988 team had a perfect 12-0 season and were national champions.

The press release continued, 

“Since his retirement from coaching, Holtz has authored several books, contributed to ESPN and CBS as a sports analyst, and continues to give back to his community through two of his own charities, the Holtz Charitable Foundation and the Holtz’s Heroes Foundation. In commemoration of his outstanding accomplishments both on and off the football field, Holtz was awarded honorary doctorates from the University of Notre Dame, the University of South Carolina, Trine University, and the Franciscan University of Steubenville. He was also elected to the College Football Hall of Fame, the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame, and the Upper Ohio Valley Hall of Fame, among many other well-deserved accolades.”

Holtz gave a speech during the Republican National Convention praising the president's pro-life stance and lamenting the pro-abortion stance of Democratic nominee Joe Biden. “The Biden-Harris ticket is the most radically pro-abortion campaign in history,” Holtz said. “They and other politicians are ‘Catholics in Name Only’ and abandon innocent lives. President Trump protects those lives.” 

Click here to read more.

December 2, 2020

Record-Breaking Baby Born from Embryo Frozen for over 27 Years

Molly Everette Gibson
On October 26, 2020, Molly Everette Gibson was born in Tennessee. Her birth is special not only because Molly is a unique human being with intrinsic value, but because it marks a new record for the longest frozen embryo ever to be born. Molly serves as an example of how life starts at conception and explains why pro-lifers oppose the all-too-common destruction of embryos created for the sake of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

Molly's birth was facilitated by the National Embryo Donation Center (NEDC). After her embryo was frozen and preserved on Oct. 14, 1992, she was finally thawed after 27 years by NEDC Lab Director & Embryologist Carol Sommerfelt on Feb. 10, 2020. She was then successfully transferred to her mother Tina Gibson's uterus by NEDC President & Medical Director Dr. Jeffrey Keenan on Feb. 12, 2020.

Upon birth, Molly weighed 6lbs. 13 oz., and measured 19 inches long.

"I think this is proof positive that no embryo should ever be discarded, certainly not because it is 'old!'" said Dr. Keenan. "This is also a testament to the excellent embryology work of Carol Sommerfelt. She is perhaps the preeminent embryologist in the country when it comes to thawing frozen embryos. And of course it's a testament to how good God is, and to His infinite goodness and love."

Sommefelt seconded Dr. Keenan's sentiment and commented on the power of technology we have today. "When Molly Everette was born on October 26, she was already 28 years old from the standpoint of the time the embryos had been frozen. This definitely reflects on the technology used all those years ago and its ability to preserve the embryos for future use under an indefinite time frame.  It also shows the reason the NEDC mission is so important, giving all donated embryos the best chance for life."

Molly broke the record held by her sister, Emma Gibson, whose embryo had been frozen for 24 years.

Click here to read more.

Illinois Teen Hospitalized at Springfield Planned Parenthood

screenshot from Springfield Right to Life video
Pro-life advocates with Springfield Right to Life recently reported that the Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Springfield, IL called an ambulance to pick up a patient on November 19.



After learning of the event, Operation Rescue requested 911 records. It obtained a redacted report verifying the medical emergency as well as a garbled radio dispatch clip indicating that an 18-year old woman fell, hit her head, and was "not alert" when the dispatch was made. The hospital she was transported to and her current medical condition were not released publicly.

Springfield Right to Life said that the incident occurred on a surgical abortion day. Women who undergo surgical abortions can experience dizziness and lightheadedness from sedation or blood loss. In some cases, it can be a sign of severe medical issues stemming from the abortion procedure. Too much blood loss can be fatal, and internal bleeding is not always easy to detect.

“A fainting spell and head strike can be serious enough in itself, but when it is abortion-related, it is even more cause for concern,” said Operation Rescue President Troy Newman. “Abortion is not safe and this is another incident that supports that claim. Anyone who says otherwise is just parroting agenda-driven fake news talking points from the Abortion Cartel.”

December 1, 2020

Poll Shows How Abortion Issue Impacted 2020 Election

photo credit: Clay Banks / Unsplash
A post-election poll conducted by McLaughlin & Associates asked 1,000 voters whether the issue of abortion affected their vote and if they voted for candidates who supported or opposed abortion. 23% of voters said that the abortion issue affected their vote and voted for candidates who oppose abortion, while only 18% said abortion affected their vote and voted for candidates who support abortion.

This poll would suggest a 5% advantage to pro-life candidates for voters who consider abortion an important issue.

In a press release, National Right to Life said that that this difference is even greater in states where its political committees were most actively involved. When only including those states, 27% of voters said that the abortion issue affected their vote and voted for candidates who oppose abortion. Only 16% of voters in those states said abortion affected their vote and voted for candidates who favor abortion. The pro-life advantage in that state was 11%, over twice the national advantage.

The National Right to Life press release reads,

"Despite being vastly outspent by pro-abortion organizations such as Planned Parenthood and EMILY’s List, pro-life candidates won last Tuesday by significant margins. There were 58 races in which a candidate supported by National Right to Life was running against a candidate supported by the pro-abortion PAC EMILY’s List. Forty (or 71%) of the National Right to Life-supported candidates won. Two races remain outstanding, with the pro-life candidate currently leading in both."

“The abortion issue has played a key role in every major election since Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980,” said Carol Tobias, National Right to Life president. “As we witnessed last Tuesday, in election after election, National Right to Life, with its network of 50 state affiliates and more than 3,000 local chapters, helped provide the margin of victory for pro-life candidates.”

Click here to read more.

"Buffer Zone" Ordinance Lifted in Jackson, Mississippi

photo credit: Victor Panlilio / Flickr
After only a year in place, an ordinance prohibiting pro-life protests outside abortion businesses in Jackson, Mississippi has been lifted by the Jackson City Council. The council voted unanimously last week to overturn the speech-limiting rule.

The ordinance was put in place in October 2019; banning people from gathering outside "health care facilities" or using any kind of amplified noise. Violating the ordinance could mean facing up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine. While it does not reference abortion businesses, it is clear that the ordinance was passed for their benefit.

The Mississippi Justice Institute filed a lawsuit on behalf of Sidewalk Advocates for Life quickly after the ordinance was originally passed last year. Aaron Rice, the institute's director, said in a press release, “We are pleased that the city of Jackson has decided to do the right thing and end this unconstitutional restriction on free expression. This is a major victory for free speech for Jackson and the state of Mississippi.”

Andy Taggart, a lawyer who worked pro-bono on behalf of Sidewalk Advocates for Life, said he was glad the freedom of speech is no longer being restricted by this ordinance. He told WLBT, “The city of Jackson has rescinded an ordinance that should have never been the law to begin with, and at least for now, things are set right.”

Click here to read more.

November 30, 2020

Illinois Abortionist's License Suspended for Hiding Out-of-State Malpractice


The Illinois Medical Board (IMB) suspended the license of abortionist George Backardjiev due to a complaint filed by the Pro-Life Action League in October 2018. The pro-life group learned that Dr. Backardjiev was under discipline for gruesome acts in the state of Texas, and he had failed to disclose that fact when renewing his medical license in Illinois.

In 2013, when Backardjiev was still practicing in Texas, he used a pair of forceps to forcefully deliver baby Olivia Coats against the will of her mother, Rachel Melancon. Gripping the child with forceps caused Olivia's skull to fracture. Olivia experienced brain hemorrhaging, which in turn led to multiple organ failure. Four days after her delivery, Olivia died.

Dr. Backardjiev was found guilty of wrongful death, and the Texas Medical Board filed a formal complaint against him which banned him from ever practicing medicine again in Texas.

Backardjiev fled to Illinois, where he had another medical license. When he renewed it in 2017, however, he did not report the discipline he faced in Texas. Doctors are obligated to disclose this kind of information when they renew their licenses, and Backardjiev's omission was illegal.

The Pro-Life Action League learned in 2018 that Backardjiev was employed by Aanchor Health Center, an abortion clinic in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. Knowing the abortionist's history, the group filed a complaint against Backardjiev with the IMB. Now, two years after that complaint, the IMB has suspended Backardjiev's medical license.

This would never have been exposed without the work of the Pro-Life Action League. Backardjiev, even after being found guilty of wrongful death in Texas, was allowed to continue working as an abortionist for years simply by moving to Illinois and choosing not to tell the IMB about what he had done in Texas. Abortionists are rarely regulated by state governments, and this is just another example of how this is especially true in the state of Illinois.

Click here to read more.

March for Life Chicago Organizes Bus Tour for 2021 Event

Rather than holding one large in-person event this year, the organizers of March for Life Chicago are hosting a "Moving the Movement" bus tour this year because of the pandemic. While the annual March for Life Chicago event will still happen on Jan. 23, this bus tour will make several stops throughout the midwest to share the pro-life message.

The tour starts on Jan. 2 with a rally in  Madison, Wisconsin. At every stop, pro-life leaders will give speeches and tell stories to inspire the pro-life movement. Event organizers also plan to hold marches and car rallies at each stop. After Madison, Wisconsin; the tour plans to stop at Des Moines, Iowa; Indianapolis, Indiana; Omaha, Nebraska; Mundelein Illinois; and Fort Wayne, Indiana before ending in Chicago, Illinois.


Event organizers say that they will abide by local regulations to keep participants safe while still allowing pro-life voices to be heard.

November 27, 2020

Massachusetts Legislature Passes Abortion until Birth Budget Amendment

Massachusetts State House
photo credit: Emmanuel Huybrechts / Flickr
A Massachusetts budget amendment allowing abortion up until the point of birth has now passed both the House and the Senate.

The amendment legalizes abortion up through the 24th week of development in cases of fetal anomalies, removes the requirement that 16 year-olds receive parental consent to have an abortion, and removes the requirement that abortionists save a born child's life if the child was born during a botched abortion.

Per that last change, the new legal language would only require that “life-supporting equipment” be present at abortion facilities. Abortionists would no longer be under any legal obligation to use it to save the life of a born child.

The margins of the budget's passage could overcome a veto by pro-abortion Governor Charlie Baker, but even he has expressed frustration with the fact that a policy like this was passed as a budget amendment.

“I do share some of the unhappiness that was raised by a number of members of the Republican Party — that putting policy in the budget was something that both leaders in the House and Senate said they would not do,” said Gov. Baker. “And it’s pretty hard to argue that this isn’t a major policy initiative that is now in the budget.”

He has also stated that he has “concerns about eliminating the parental-notification requirement” and about “changing the terms and conditions associated with late-term abortions in Massachusetts.”

Click here to read more.

5th Circuit Upholds States' Right to Exclude Planned Parenthood from Medicaid

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on Monday that Texas and Louisiana can exclude Planned Parenthood clinics from receiving Medicaid funding. This decision vacated an earlier preliminary injunction which prevented the states from cutting off Medicaid funding from the abortion business.

In Judge Priscilla Owen's opinion for the 11-5 majority, he wrote "Medicaid beneficiaries have an 'absolute right' … to receive services from a provider whom the State has determined is “qualified,” but beneficiaries have no right under the statute to challenge a State’s determination that a provider is unqualified."

The ruling also applies to Mississippi, which is within the 5th Circuit's jurisdiction.

This case started when Texas made its original decision to exclude Planned Parenthood from Medicaid funding back in 2016. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton wrote in a statement that a series of undercover videos released by the Center for Medical Progress “plainly showed Planned Parenthood admitting to morally bankrupt and unlawful conduct, including violations of federal law by manipulating the timing and methods of abortions to obtain fetal tissue for their own research.” 

David Daleiden, who led the undercover investigation referenced, said that the 5th Circuit's ruling validates the CMP videos, which pro-abortion advocates say are "deceptively-edited". "The full federal 5th Circuit's decision this week confirms that our undercover footage is accurate and reliable evidence of serious criminality in the abortion industry and fetal trafficking enterprises, and it affirms the broad authority that state and federal administrators have to defund entities like Planned Parenthood for illegally selling the body parts of aborted infants."

November 26, 2020

Happy Thanksgiving!

Despite all the complications that came with 2020, we still have plenty to be thankful for; especially LIFE! The Illinois Federation for Right to Life wishes everyone a happy Thanksgiving!

November 25, 2020

Nebraska Law Banning Dismemberment Abortion Takes Effect Without Legal Challenges

Nebraska State Capitol
photo credit: Steven Martin / Flickr
A Nebraska law banning the gruesome practice of dismemberment abortions has taken effect, surprisingly without any legal challenges from pro-abortion advocates like Planned Parenthood.

Nebraska Legislative Bill 814, which passed in August, bans dilation and evacuation (D&E) as a method of abortion. D&E abortions involve an abortionist inserting a type of seaweed called laminaria into the pregnant mother's cervix to cause it to dilate. One or two days later, the abortionist will use tools to further expand the opening before beginning the "evacuation" part of the abortion. Amniotic fluid will be vacuumed out of the mother's uterus, and then the abortionist will use a clamping tool with sharp teeth to reach inside the uterus and tear individual limbs off of the unborn child until only the head is left. An abortionist will use his clamp to crush the head and remove it piece by piece. This method is used during the second trimester, at which point the unborn child's head is too large to remove otherwise.

The Associated Press reported that 95% of abortions after the first trimester are D&E abortions, but Planned Parenthood and infamous late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart say that the new law will not affect their businesses.

“Planned Parenthood is proud to provide our patients with high-quality, nonjudgmental reproductive health care, and that will not change with this new law,” said Planned Parenthood spokeswoman Emily Bisek.

Carhart told the Omaha World-Herald that the law is "going to make no difference in what we offer to the populace. We will be able to provide the same quality and level of services we have for many years."

Contradicting Carhart's statement, his business's website shows that he does use D&E as a method of 2nd-trimester abortion.

Click here to read more.

November 24, 2020

Federal Court Hears Arguments over California Abortion Coverage Mandate

Churches in the state of California have challenged the state regarding its mandate that employers include abortion in their health care plans, even if they believe abortion conflicts with their religious beliefs. Last Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard the first arguments in that case.

Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is representing three Christian churches challenging the mandate. ADF argues that internal emails between Planned Parenthood and the state show that the abortion business pushed the state to enforce its abortion coverage mandate against religious organizations. Religious groups were not originally included in the 2014 mandate.

Pro-life groups filed legal motions against the mandate, arguing that the Weldon Amendment, a 2005 law barring the federal government from funding state and local governments which force health care entities to cover abortions. The Obama administration rejected the motion, claiming that the Weldon Amendment had not been violated.

In January of this year, the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services ruled that California did violate the Weldon Amendment; threatening to enforce it by withholding federal funding unless the state stopped mandating groups to provide abortion coverage against their conscientious beliefs.

So far, the state has refused to comply with the demand.

Click here to read more.

Federal Court Upholds Tennessee's Ban on Discriminatory Abortions

Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee
Last Friday, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Tennessee can legally ban the discriminatory practice of aborting children solely because they were diagnosed with Down Syndrome or the parents disliked the child's race or sex.

The court ruled 2-1 that the bans on discriminatory abortions could take effect while the court hears arguments regarding other aspects of Tennessee's pro-life legislation, which was signed into law by Tennessee Governor Bill Lee in July.

The ruling strikes a devastating blow against the legal challenge issued by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU, but there will still be arguments about the heartbeat aspect of the law.

The bill requires doctors to perform an ultrasound on a woman before she can have an abortion. If the ultrasound detects a heartbeat, it would be illegal to abort that child. This portion of the law is still unenforceable due to an injunction placed against it.

After the federal court's ruling allowing part of the law to go into effect, abortion businesses applied for a temporary restraining order to block its enforcement.

Click here to read more.

November 23, 2020

Pro-life Groups Sue Washington DC for Viewpoint Discrimination

On Nov. 18, Students for Life of American (SFLA) and the Frederick Douglass Foundation (FDF) filed a lawsuit in federal court against Washington D.C. alleging that the city discriminated against pro-life speech.

Back in August, police arrested two pro-life advocates for writing pro-life messages in chalk on a sidewalk outside a Washington D.C. Planned Parenthood clinic. This came after the city chose not to enforce its defacement ordinance when people painted political messages on city streets during anti-racism protests.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser commissioned part of 16th street near the White House painted with the slogan "Black Lives Matter" in permanent paint. The phrase "Defund the Police" was also added.

“The government can’t discriminate against certain viewpoints by allowing some voices to be heard while silencing others,” said Alliance Defending Freedom Legal Counsel Elissa Graves.

“Because of the city’s actions, Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life of America weren’t able to participate in the public square as other groups have. The First Amendment prohibits the government from picking and choosing whose speech to allow.”

Click here to read more.

November 20, 2020

Satanic Temple Motion to Recuse Justice Barrett from Missouri Abortion Case Fails

photo credit: Richard Gillin / Flickr
In October, the Satanic Temple (TST) filed a motion before the Supreme Court to have Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused from its case challenging Missouri's 72-hour waiting period. TST claims that Barrett could not be impartial due to her religious beliefs, but the Supreme Court dismissed the motion.

TST's lawsuit attempting to overturn waiting period and informed consent laws in Missouri was dismissed in 2018 by the Eight Circuit Court, and the Supreme Court will soon decide whether it will hear the case as well.

TST now calls abortion a "religious rite" in an attempt to get around legal abortion restrictions. By making this argument, the group can claim that abortion restrictions violate religious freedoms. That argument made little headway in the Eight Circuit and is unlikely to succeed in the Supreme Court if the case is heard.

Click here to read more.

Pro-Lifers Arrested Outside San Francisco Hospital for Protesting Abortion and Fetal Organ Harvesting

Pro-life protestors being arrested
outside Zuckerberg San Francisco
General Hospital
photo credit: Lauren Handy / Facebook
On Tuesday, a group of pro-life protestors was arrested outside Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital. They were advocating against abortion and fetal organ harvesting, which the hospital does in order to provide fetal tissue for the University of California San Francisco.

Lauren Handy of Red Rose Rescue was one of the pro-lifers present when the group was arrested. She wrote on Facebook later that day,

“This morning a group of us were arrested outside Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital because we refused to comply to an unlawful order of dispersement… for interrupting a business. That business? UCSF’s aborted fetal organ harvesting program on healthy babies up to 24 weeks.

We were on public property and within the rights of free speech activities (our lawyers even sent them a letter) but UCSF is so hell bent on protecting their aborted fetal organ harvesting program.

This is just the beginning! A lawsuit is in the works because we won't stand down!”

Terrisa Bukovinac is the executive director of Pro-Life San Francisco, and she was also arrested that morning. In her own Facebook post, she said, “I will not be silenced or bullied unlawfully by police and I will use my voice every chance I get to defend the unborn victims of fetal organ harvesting who cannot defend themselves.”

Bukovinac also linked to a video of the pro-life protestors being arrested. Interestingly, Facebook is preventing websites from directly embedding the video onto their websites, but the video is still viewable on Facebook's website. This soft-censorship is somewhat frustrating for websites such as IFRL's blog, but you can still watch the video by clicking here.

Pro-Life San Francisco announced it will be pursuing legal action regarding the arrest and are confident it will win in court.

“We will not allow our 1st Amendment rights to be suppressed on the very site where viable, healthy babies are either dismembered alive or born alive and dissected for experimentation,” said Pro-Life San Francisco. “We will not give up our quest in demanding Ethical Research NOW!”

Click here to read more.