January 5, 2011
Governments should not be spending tax-payers' money on aborting the babies of poor people in the developing world
SPUC has responded to the recent announcement by the Department for International Development (DFID) in the UK that plans to spend an extra £2.1 billion on programs including abortion and contraception. It is reported that adolescent girls in poor countries will be a target for UK interventions.
Peter Smith, SPUC's specialist in international affairs, told the media today:
"It is farcical for the government to talk about safe abortions in situations without sterile surgical facilities, safe blood transfusion or emergency back-up. Running abortion clinics in slums, shanty towns and the bush will harm or kill women as well as killing babies.
"Among the abortion organisations that the UK government currently funds, one runs 30 clinics in South Africa, with 10 so-called mini-clinics in poor townships. The organisations says they are cheap to run, relying on pre-fab buildings, basic equipment and minimal levels of staffing. Since this group started working in South Africa, the maternal death rate, according to the UN, has increased over four-fold. If this kind of intervention is multiplied, the deaths of unborn children and maternal deaths can be expected to increase, not decrease.
"And what is UK doing bankrolling illegal child sex around the world by promoting contraception for minors? We should learn the lesson of the disastrous government-funded attempts to reduce teenage abortions in the UK, which have focused on providing contraception. There has been a 13% increase in abortions among under 18s in the past 10 years, and a spiralling incidence of sexually-transmitted infections".
Contact: John Smeaton
Source: SPUC
Publish Date: January 4, 2011