October 11, 2014

Jennifer Garner: Permanent baby bump a testament to my children


“I am not pregnant, but I have had three kids and there is a bump,” said Garner, shooting down speculation that she and husband Ben Affleck were expecting baby No. 4 after paparazzi photos over the summer showed her with a bit of a rounded tummy….

“I get congratulated all the time by people I know. This one woman who had babysat for us said, ‘Oh, my gosh! I can’t wait for No. 4,’ and I thought, ‘What is going on?’ ” Garner said. “So I asked around and apparently I have a baby bump, and I’m here to tell you that I do!”

While Hollywood demands physical perfection, the… star says she’s fine knowing that after three children, her midsection is a little more curvaceous. And people who see her will just have to deal….
“From now on, ladies, I will have a bump, and it will be my baby bump. It’s not going anywhere,” she said. “Its name is VioletSam and Sera.”

People magazine, reporting on 42-yr-old actress Jennifer Garner’sappearance on The Ellen DeGeneres Show to quell the rumors, October 8

[HT: reader Denise; photo via eonline.com]

October 8, 2014

‘Saved by the Bell’ star: I would have become a father at 15, but my baby was aborted


Former teen heartthrob Mario Lopez, who skyrocketed to fame in the late '80s and 1990s playing A.C. Slater in Saved by the Bell, has revealed he is a post-abortive father.

In his newly published memoirs Just Between Us, Lopez comes clean about his hypersexual behavior, which began in childhood and cost him a child and a marriage.
Sex became his “drug of choice” early in his life, he wrote.
“I started having sex so young. The day before my 13th birthday” – something he sees as totally warped “now that I'm a dad.” He blames his early sexualization on growing up in a tough area in Southern California. “When you're growing up in the hood, everybody grows up fast.”
Lopez says when he was 15, he impregnated a girl and was ready to work full-time to support his child, but she had an abortion.
“I could have a kid who is 25 years old,” Lopez, who will turn 41 later this month, wrote.
He hit stardom as part of the tween series Saved by the Bell and went on to star in numerous television shows and movies – including performing nude scenes and in drag in the series Nip/Tuck.
His sexual antics assured that Lopez's first marriage ended nearly before it began. He married Ali Landry, a former Miss USA, in 2004, but Landry had the marriage annulled within two weeks after photographs emerged of Lopez cheating on her at his bachelor party. He has since married and had two children, Gia Francesa and Dominic.
Both of Lopez's marriages took place in the Roman Catholic Church.
He has branched out into television interviews, scoring a well-received interview with future President Barack Obama just six days before the 2008 election for Extra TV. “Senator, many voters in the Latino community have conservative values. Why should we vote for you?” he asked.
Sarah Palin told him in a later interview that she believed being a grandmother might change Hillary Clinton's views on abortion.

Lopez told Newsweek he goes to church “every week” but says he is working when the confessional is open.
“I confess every night in my head,” he said, “because if I waited all week, it’d be too much. God would be overwhelmed.”
Source: LifeSiteNews by Ben Johnson

October is Breast Cancer Awareness, But Will Anyone Tell Women of Abortion’s Link?

I wanted to take a few minutes to address all that pink you’ve been seeing in stores, on athletes and on your TV screen. October is Breast Cancer Awareness month and it has never hit home harder for me than this year.

“We did find cancer cells in your breast biopsy,” said the doctor matter-of-factly.
Cancer!!! I was stunned, shocked senseless with words I never thought I would hear!
gayleatteburyCancer happens to other people, not to me! The doctor’s words were droning on: ”…we need to start treatment right away; do you have a surgeon, or would you like me to recommend one?” Treatment! Am I going to die? My mind raced.

The thought of heaven was a peaceful one in this sin-filled, trouble-wracked world. But am I ready to leave my family just now? How could I find someone to take my job quickly? My mind darted to all of the things I needed to do before I die. The doctor’s voice was assuring me that she would have the surgeon call and set up an appointment quickly. I hung up the phone.

My mind bounced from thought to thought, but before much time elapsed, anger welled up inside of me…anger at abortion! While I knew that abortion was not the cause of my cancer (ten years of hormonal replacement therapy is a likely culprit), it is a fact that women choosing abortion have a significantly higher chance of abortion than women who do not. My anger grew as I next thought of Planned Parenthood, who vehemently denies the abortion-breast cancer link, all the while pocketing millions of dollars annually as the nation’s largest abortion-provider.

My mind focused next on a gentleman who sat in front of my desk two years previously as a result of an article I wrote condemning the Susan G. Komen Foundation for giving donations to Planned Parenthood affiliates around the nation. As head of the Oregon affiliate of the Komen Foundation, he was asking me to relent of my words.

Even though the Oregon affiliate had not given to Planned Parenthood, he could give me no promise, no policy, no principle, that would prevent it from giving to Planned Parenthood in the future. He even attempted to defend the practice. I told him I found it unconscionable that an organization whose sole purpose was to find a cure for breast cancer would donate to an organization whose main action was one that could cause the cancer they were trying to heal.
breastcancerOver 60 epidemiological studies conducted in countries throughout the world show an increased risk of breast cancer in women who have had abortions. Patrick Caroll, Director of Research for the UK Pension and Population Research Institute, says“legally induced abortion is found to be the best predictor of British breast cancer trends.”

Dr. Janet Daling, pro-choice researcher with Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle found in a 1994 study that “among women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50% higher than among other women.” Daling also found that “teenagers under age 18 and women over 29 years of age who procure an abortion increase their breast cancer risk by more than 100%.”

Her most alarming find was that “teenagers with a family history of breast cancer who procure an abortion face a risk of breast cancer that is incalculably high. All 12 women in her study with this history were diagnosed with breast cancer by the age of 45″. [Janet R. Daling et al., “Risk of Breast Cancer Among Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,” 86 Journal of the National Cancer Institute; (1994);1584]

My breast surgery in late September revealed the cancer has spread. Fear, uncertainty, chemo treatments. I do not wish these things on any woman. Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women. Over 232,000 women are expected to be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 2014, and 40,000 women are projected to die of it. Many factors put women at risk for breast cancer, most of which women are beginning to be made aware of. However, the abortion-breast cancer link is the one risk factor that is covered over for “politically correct” reasons. It must be added to list so that women choosing abortion will have full knowledge ahead of time. Women who have had abortions must be more alert and diligent to get regular mammograms.

Abortion has become a “sacred right,” protected by abortion advocacy groups who would rather protect abortion rights than the women they claim to represent. Women are suffering a tremendous disservice in order to protect the pocket books of abortion providers. We are living in an age proud of its “full disclosure” for every decision. Shouldn’t every woman contemplating an abortion be given all the information she needs to make an informed choice? We certainly owe her that much.

Consider making a donation to help towards the end breast cancer to: The Breast Cancer Prevention Institute. Please, schedule your mammogram appointment today! For more information on the ABC link, see www.abortionbreastcancer.com.

LifeNews Note: Gayle Atteberry is the Executive Director of Oregon Right to Life

The abortion industry’s looming RU-486 legal crisis

RU-486 mifepristone abortion pillPolitico article today about new abortion cases that could reach the Supreme Court gave bare mention of its potential review of RU-486 regulation.

But due a circuit court split on laws regulating the administration of RU-486, such a review looks likely - and promising for the pro-life side.

Quick history of RU-486

In an unprecedented move the FDA approved the abortion pill RU-486 (now known as mifepristone/mifeprex) in 2000 to sell in the U.S. using a fast-track process reserved only for drugs to combat life-threatening diseases, like AIDS.

RU-486 abortion pill NOW mifepristoneIt seemed obvious at the time, and was later confirmed, that “the Clintonadministration pushed the abortion pill through the approval process to appease the abortion lobby,” reported Judicial Watch in 2006 after reviewing newly released documents that showed “the RU-486 approval process was infected by raw politics.”

But pro-lifers have recently begun turning the abortion industry’s political ploy on itself.

Importantly, with the FDA’s fast-track approval came “restricted use,” meaning the agency discourages “off-label” administration of RU-486.

In 14 years the FDA has never deviated from its recommended protocol for RU-486, which requires three doctor visits and specific dosages and routes of administration, all within 49 days from the beginning of a pregnant mother’s last period:
  • Day 1: administer three 200 mg tablets (600 mg total) of RU-486 orally to kill the baby
  • Day 3: administer two 200 mcg tablets (400 mcg total) of Cytotec (misoprostol) orally to expel the baby
  • Day 14: check-up to ensure the abortion was completed

Violating FDA protocol at every step

But abortion clinics violate FDA protocol in every possible way. A survey of National Abortion Federationmembers showed only 4% follow FDA guidelines, and Planned Parenthood is the biggest culprit. It owns158 of 175, or 90%, of all known chemical abortion facilities in the U.S.
Telemed abortion of RU-486 mifepristoneAccording to court documents, Planned Parenthood commits RU-486 abortions up to 63 days from the first day of a pregnant mother’s last period.

It gives only one 200 mg tablet orally at the abortion clinic, then instructs the woman to take one 200 mcg Cytotec at home by letting it dissolve under her tongue (getting into the system faster than if swallowed).

Worse, Planned Parenthood has lately been trying to do all this via telemed – dispensing chemical abortion drugs via remote computer, so the abortionist never comes in contact with the patient.

The pro-abortion claim that “off-label” use of drugs is commonplace is disingenuous, because the pathway by which RU-486 was approved placed it in a restricted category.

Abortion industry’s cash cow

RU-486 is the abortion industry’s new cash cow business model, as verified by the surge of Planned Parenthood’s chemical abortion business. A 2014 Guttmacher report indicated that while abortion dropped 13% in 2011, the percentage of chemical abortions increased by 20% from three years earlier, to account for 22.6% of all abortions.

Abortion clinics are obviously trying to cut corners. And safety be damned because, as Americans United for Life attorney Mailee Smith noted:
Eight. That’s the number of women who have died from a severe bacterial infection following use of RU-486. In all eight cases, the women were instructed to use the abortion drugs in a way that has not been approved by the FDA.
Zero. That’s the number of women who have died from a severe bacterial infection after using RU-486 in the way approved by the FDA.
AUL has written model legislation that forces abortion clinics to comply with FDA protocol on RU-486 drug administration.

Four states have thus far passed legislation based on AUL’s language: ArizonaNorth DakotaOhio, andOklahoma.

The abortion industry has sued to block all four laws. To date the federal 5th and 6th Circuit Court of Appeals have both ruled in our favor, and the 9th Circuit has ruled in the other side’s favor.
This gives us a “circuit split,” making it more likely the Supreme Court will weigh in.

Supreme Court precedent satisfied

Smith cited three reasons AUL is “confident” the language AUL has encouraged states to adopt falls well within Supreme Court precedent for both the Casey and Gonzales decisions:
  1. The first so-called right at issue is the right of a woman to make the ultimate decision to have an abortion, and the regulation of chemical abortion does not interfere with that.
     
  2. The court has said state legislatures are given wide discretion to legislate when there is medical uncertainty over a procedure or regulation. Here we know the unapproved use of RU-486 regimen has been tied to eight deaths. The other side argues that the off-label use did not cause those deaths. What’s important here is the cause is unknown. That is what creates the medical uncertainty.
     
  3. In Gonzeles the court upheld the federal Partial Birth Abortion Ban in part because there were other commonly used methods still available. If the regulation of chemical abortion means a woman cannot have one because she’s past gestational dates, she still has the option of surgical abortion. Surgical abortion is the most common method, and there is peer-reviewed evidence it’s safer than chemical abortion.
Were SCOTUS to uphold chemical abortion regulations, more state legislatures would be encouraged to regulate them, making abortions harder for the industry to commit.

[Screenshot of telemed abortion in Iowa via LifeSiteNews.com]

October 7, 2014

IFRL PAC Announces its Endorsements for the Illinois 2014 General Election


Illinois Federation for Right to Life PAC
Endorsements for the 2014 General Election

United States Senator
James “Jim” Oberweis (R)

Attorney General
Paul M. Schimpf (R)

Congressional Races
Eric Wallace (R) CD2
Daniel Lipinski (D) CD3
Peter Roskam (R) CD6
Larry Kaifesh (R) CD8
Susanne Atanus (R) CD9
Darlene Senger (R) CD11
Mike Bost (R) CD12
Rodney Davis (R) CD13
Randall M. Hultgren (R) CD14
John M. Shimkus (R) CD15
Adam Kinzinger (R) CD16
Bobby Schilling (R) CD17
Aaron Schock (R) CD18

State Senate
Shaun Colin Murphy (R) LD18
Michael G. Connelly (R) LD21
Chris Nybo (R) LD24
Matt Murphy (R) LD27
Karen McConnaughay (R) LD33
Neil Anderson (R) LD36
Tim Bivins (R) LD45
Linda Little (R) LD48
Chapin Rose (R) LD51
Kyle McCarter (R) LD54

State House
Mark Calonder (R)  HD10
Michael P. McAuliffe (R) HD20
Mark Ekhoff (R) HD34
Victor C. Horne (R) HD35
Margo McDermed (R) HD37
Heidi Holan (R) HD46
Patricia R. Bellock (R) HD47
Peter Breen (R) HD48
Keith Wheeler (R) HD50
David McSweeney (R) HD52
David Harris (R) HD53
Tom Morrison (R) HD54
Bill Grossi (R) HD57
Keith Turner (I) HD60
Sheri Jesiel (R) HD61
Rod Drobinski (R) HD62
Steven Reick (R) HD63
Barbara Wheeler (R) HD64
Steven A. Andersson (R) HD65
Michael W. Tryon (R) HD66
John Cabello (R) HD68
Joe Sosnowski (R) HD69
Robert W. Pritchard (R) HD70
Jim Wozniak (R) HD71
Donald L. Moffitt (R) HD74
Jerry Long (R) HD76
Katherine Cloonen (D) HD79
Jim Durkin (R) HD82
Krishna Bansal (R) HD84
Diane Harris (R) HD86
Rich Brauer (R) HD87
Keith Sommer (R) HD88
Tom Demmer (R) HD90
Michael D. Unes (R) HD91
Norine K. Hammond HD93
Randy E. Frese (R) HD94
Wayne  Rosenthal (R) HD95
Sue Scherer (D) HD96
Mark Batinick (R) HD97
Yvonne Bolton (R) HD98
Raymond Poe (R) HD99
Christopher Davidsmeyer (R) HD100
Bill Mitchell (R) HD101
Adam Brown (R) HD102
Chad Hays (R) HD104
Dan Brady (R) HD105
John Cavaletto (R) HD107
Charlie Meier (R) HD108
David Reis (R) HD109
Reginald Phillips (R) HD110
Daniel V. Beiser (D) HD111
Dwight Kay (R) HD112
Melinda Hult (R) HD113
Terri Bryant (R) HD115
Jerry Costello II (D) HD116
John Bradley (D) HD117
Brandon Phelps (D) HD118


Local Races
Mark Curran, Jr. for Lake County Sherriff

This ad is paid for by the IFRL-PAC, connected with the Illinois Federation for Right to Life, Inc. and was not authorized by any of the candidates. Joe Behnken Treasurer. A copy of our report is on file and is available for purchase from the Federal Election Commission, Washington, D.C., and the Illinois State Board of Elections, Springfield, IL.

October 6, 2014

Students Create Unbelievable Works of Art for National Pro-Life Chalk Day

Yesterday, Students for Life of America (SFLA) and other pro-life groups participated in National Pro-Life Chalk Day at junior high, high school and college campuses across the country.

Kristan Hawkins, President of Students for Life, said SFLA has encouraged sidewalk chalking on college campuses and public places in the past because its one of the cheapest, most creative and effective ways of getting your pro-life message out to as many people as there is foot traffic.

Hawkins said, “Sidewalk chalking pro-life messages on campus is a critical tool to educate students in schools across the country. With a few pieces of chalk and pro-life slogans, you can leave a lasting impression on hundreds or even thousands of people. With National Pro-Life Chalk Day, we are uniting students from across the country as they make an impact on their campus and their communities.”

As it turns out, pro-lifers are pretty artistic! See some of their artwork below!
prolifechalkday
prolifechalkday2
prolifechalkday3
prolifechalkday4
prolifechalkday5
LifeNews.com by Sarah Zagorski

5 Hypocritical Pro-Abortion Celebrities

Hollywood celebrities often star in films and TV shows that feature pro-life plot lines. Unfortunately, these pro-life messages don’t follow them out of the studio. These are just a few actors whose pro-abortion views don’t match the encouraging work they’ve produced.

1. Mark Ruffalo
markruffaloRuffalo is staunchly pro-abortion. Not only did he deem it “common sense” to support abortion rights, he even claimed he was proud his mother aborted his sibling.

Columnist Kathryn Lopez made an important contrast between Ruffalo’s comments and the movie “Just Like Heaven.” Ruffalo starred opposite Reese Witherspoon in this 2005 film, which Lopez said had an undeniably pro-life message:
“In the 2005 movie “Just Like Heaven,” Ruffalo played a role that tackled the challenges of life, death and modern health care as his character fell in love with a woman in a coma. The storyline was fanciful, but it presented audiences with an underlying — if much debated — understanding: that living bodies, no matter how damaged, deserve consideration and demand respect, as all life does.”
His onscreen respect for vulnerable life unfortunately does not seem to translate to the real world.

2. Dianna Agron

Quinn Fabray was the squeaky clean, devoutly religious cheerleader on “Glee.” That was briefly in season one. Viewers soon found out that Quinn cheated on her boyfriend Finn by sleeping with his best friend Puck. Unsurprisingly, she finds herself pregnant. Unlike many young teenagers today, Quinn doesn’t go to a Planned Parenthood to seek “help.” She chooses life for her unplanned child and gives her up for adoption.

In reality, however, Agron is proudly pro-abortion. Here she is speaking at a NARAL event:


If only Agron would have shared with the audience how Quinn, when faced with a difficult situation, ultimately chose life for her child.

3. Ellen Page

Oh, Juno. This one is pretty obvious. When The Guardian asked Page about the controversy her role as the pregnant teenager Juno caused in 2007, her response would make any pro-lifer shake their head:
“I was like, you know what? You all need to calm down. People are so black and white about this. Because she kept the baby everybody said the film was against abortion. But if she’d had an abortion everybody would have been like, “Oh my God.” I am a feminist and I am totally pro-choice, but what’s funny is when you say that people assume that you are pro-abortion. I don’t love abortion but I want women to be able to choose and I don’t want white dudes in an office being able to make laws on things like this. I mean what are we going to do – go back to clothes hangers?”
In another interview, Page again claimed Juno’s decision was not exactly “pro-life”:
“I think she dealt with it in a democratic way. She goes to the clinic and Juno deals with it in a relatively nonchalant manner and the reason she decides to leave is actually just because of some random, weird reason. It’s about fingernails.”
That interview was seven years ago. I hope an older Page would now realize her comments were baseless. Contrary to Page’s interpretation, Juno’s decision to walk away from the abortion clinic because of fingernails was not a “random, weird reason.” The character understood that at this point in her pregnancy, her baby had her own unique fingernails – a distinctly human feature. With that realization, she couldn’t deny the humanity of her child in the womb. Watch the clip below – it’s still, in my opinion, the best scene in the film:



4. Felicity Huffman

Felicity Huffman’s role as Lynette Scavo on “Desperate Housewives” offered at least one particularly pro-life moment. Speak4life.org highlighted the scene in which Lynette is initially dismayed by her late pregnancy announcement at age 40, questioning if she can manage another mouth to feed. But, after considering the “gift” of being a mom, she quickly changes her mind.

Once again, however, we see the actress’s ideals don’t exactly resemble those of the character she portrayed:
“She was the co-chair of the September 15 NARAL Power of Choice luncheon where the chief of staff to First Lady Michelle Obama was the keynote speaker. NARAL said Huffman ‘is one of the entertainment community’s greatest champions of a woman’s right to choose.’”
In 2011, Huffman and her husband William H. Macy even performed a cringe worthy duet at a NARAL Pro-Choice America event, in which they mocked Bill O’Reilly and sang lyrics such as, “I’m supporting my parents’ two unpopular wars, so let me decide what goes on in my drawers”:



5. Allison Janney

Janney is best known for her role on the long running series “The West Wing,” but her minor role in “Juno” is what’s worth consideration in regards to her views on abortion. In 2009, Janney voiced her support for pro-abortion President Barack Obama and promoted the efforts of the pro-abortion organization EMILY’s List:
“With Republicans already on the air attacking our candidates and busy distorting President Obama’s accomplishments, every contribution EMILY’s List receives will be put to use right away,” Janney said. “Your contribution will be used immediately to recruit strong, pro-choice Democratic women candidates and build a talented, progressive field for 2010.”
Compare this with Janney’s role in “Juno.” When her daughter reveals that she is pregnant and is giving her child up for adoption, Janney’s character, Bren, is distraught. But, after some reflection, she acknowledges that another couple is going to experience the joy of being parents in an otherwise unfortunate predicament:
“Somebody else is going to find a precious blessing from Jesus in this garbage dump of a situation.”
In a later scene, Bren accompanies Juno to her ultrasound. When she sees the stunning image of her granddaughter, she is visibly emotional and cries tears of joy. What’s more, she defends her daughter’s parenting skills to a rather rude ultrasound technician. The scene is endearing, hysterical and worth watching.

It’s unfortunate these actors can’t realize and appreciate the pro-life messages in their own work. I guess once the scripts are put away and the cameras are turned off, their true agendas get the spotlight.

LifeNews Note: Cortney O’Brien is a Townhall web editor, where this was originally published.

October 3, 2014

Abortion and suicide: the grim statistics

sadwoman64
Pro-Choice groups and organizations such as Planned Parenthood maintain that abortion is beneficial to women. They claim that women do not have emotional problems after their abortions. Planned Parenthood’s slogan “Care. No Matter What” implies that their workers care about women and are dedicated to helping them in difficult circumstances.

On their website, Planned Parenthood claims:

“Research studies indicate that emotional responses to legally induced abortion are largely positive. They also indicate that emotional problems resulting from abortion are rare and less frequent than those following childbirth.”

Unfortunately, statistics tell a different story.

Two studies from Finland (1) show that women who had abortions were 6 to 7 times more likely to commit suicide than women who gave birth. These studies were based on medical records rather than interviews. Researchers looked at the death certificates of women to ascertain how many died by suicide.  Then they used medical records to see how many of these women had abortions. The fact that this study was based on medical records is significant, because of a phenomenon called “recall bias.” Recall bias occurs when women are asked on questionnaires or in person whether they had an abortion. Many times, because of the stigma attached to the abortion procedure, women do not answer this question honestly. This tendency to hide a past abortion often skews the results of such studies. Therefore, studies that are based on medical records rather than interviews are considered to be more accurate.

The study only covered the first year after women’s abortions. Many post-abortion testimonies reveal that grief after an abortion can surface years later; sometimes a wanted pregnancy, seeing ultrasound pictures or photographs of unborn babies, or holding a friend’s baby triggers regret, depression, and suicidal feelings. So in reality, these studies may actually reveal only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to suicidal feelings after abortion.

Other statistics show that women have a higher rate of suicide after abortion. Suicide rates among women of childbearing age are approximately 11.3 out of 100,000.

Postabortion women have a [suicide] rate of 34.7. Interestingly enough, women who have given birth have a suicide rate of 5.9 per hundred thousand. Birth, then, seems to give some protection against suicide. Perhaps women who have children discover they’ve something to live for, or do not want to hurt the children that depend on them by committing suicide. In any case, giving birth seems to be a detriment to suicide – whereas abortion increases the suicide rate.

Shortly after the Finnish studies, researchers in Great Britain conducted their own survey of abortion medical records. They found a similar correlation between abortion and suicide. They found an 8.1 rate of suicide per thousand women who had abortions, and a 1.9 rate of suicide among women who carry to term.

The statistics for teenagers who have abortions are even more disturbing. Teen girls are 10 times more likely to attempt suicide if they have had an abortion in the last six months than girls who have not had an abortion, and 2-4 times more likely to commit suicide after abortion compared to adult women.(2)

A study done by Doctor David C Reardon, and abortion researcher and mental health professional who helps post-abortion women revealed a 154% higher suicide rate among women who aborted.(3) In interviews for his book, “Aborted Women: Silent No More” (Springfield, IL: Acorn Books, 2002), he discovered that up to 60% of women experienced suicidal feelings. Dr. Reardon’s research was done on women who regretted their abortions, so his data may not be applicable to all women who have abortions. However, a 60% statistic cannot be ignored. 28% of the women he interviewed had actually attempted suicide.

Another survey of post-abortion women, which appeared in Women’s World, revealed that 45% (well over a third) of women had suicidal feelings following their abortions.(4).

These are just some of the studies connecting abortion with suicide. Pro-life organizations need to reach out to post-abortion women and give them encouragement, support, and compassion

By Sarah Terzo

Sarah Terzo is a pro-life author and creator of the clinicquotes.com website. She is a member of Secular Pro-Life and PLAGAL. This appeared at liveactionnews.org and NRL News